IT applications portfolio management under business and implementation uncertainty
Masafumi Kotani , Junichi Iijima
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› 2008, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (1) : 109 -124.
Corporations need to improve business processes in order to enhance velocity and service levels while reducing their processing costs and differentiating themselves in the face of competition. The levitation of importance beyond support roles has raised IT investment decisions to high priority in chief executive officers’ agendas. Corporate planning groups as well as lines of business are increasingly applying techniques of IT applications portfolio management in a more systematic fashion to improve decision-making and resource-allocation processes.
Recent advances in software engineering and IT service delivery methodologies have achieved the logical separation of business functions from implementation. This separation has made a new breed of innovative IT project possible with a new project risk structure; the adjustment of portfolio management techniques is appropriate. We present an integrated portfolio management model so that the corporation can focus on organic growth through sources at both the department and top management levels. The research gives clear advice as to how top management can seek economic growth by selecting an entrepreneurial strategic posture, implying a strong risk-taking propensity. By integrating a risk-return model and risk-tolerance paradigm to cope with today’s risk structure, overall capabilities can improve the decision process and the corporation’s performance as well. The application of the integrated technique to a Japanese manufacturing firm is described.
IT-investment management / application portfolio management / real options analysis / risk-return model / risk-tolerance paradigm / timing decision
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
Anand, J., Oriani, R. & Vassolo, R. (2006). Managing a portfolio of strategic growth options. Paper presented at the International Annual Conference of the Academy of Management, Atlanta, GA. |
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
Bhaumik, K. (2003). Unleashing value through portfolio analysis-an offshore perspective. Cognizant Technology Solutions. Available via DIALOG. http://www.cognizant.com |
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
Brynjolfsson, E., Hitt, L. & Yang, S. (2002). Intangible assets: computers and organizational capital. Center for eBusiness at MIT Sloan School of Management |
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
Cornelius, P., Kogurt, B.M. (2003). Corporate governance in emerging markets: a key to competitiveness. World Economic Forum Knowledge Navigator. Available via DIALOG. http://www.weforum.org |
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
Dixit, A.K. & Pindyk, R.S. (1995). The options approach to capital investment. Harvard Business Review, May/June, 105–115 |
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
Featherstone, A.M. & Moss, C.B. (1990). Quantifying gains to risk diversification using certainty equivalence in a mean-variance model: an application to florida citrus. Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, December, 191–198 |
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
Glass, R.L. (2005) IT failure rates — 70% or 10-15%? IEEE Software, May/June: 110–112 |
| [19] |
IFPUG Counting Practices Manual, Release 4. (1995). International Function Point Users Group, Westerville, OH |
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
John, H. & Singer, M. (1991). Unbundling the Corporation. Harvard Business Review, March/April: 134–141. |
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
Mason, R. & Weed, H. (2005). Can greater uncertainty hasten investment? University of Southampton working paper. Available via DIALOG. http://www.soton.ac.uk/~ram2 |
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
McDonald, R. & Siegel, D. (1986). The value of waiting to invest. NBER Working Paper No.1019. The Quarterly Journal of Economics |
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
Mun, J. (2005). Real Options Analysis: Tools and Techniques for Valuing Strategic Investments and Decisions. Wiley. |
| [37] |
Oriani, R. (2006). Technology switch option and the market value of the firm: a model and an empirical test. Paper presented at the International Annual Conference of the Academy of Management, Atlanta, GA |
| [38] |
Passori, A. (2004). Selecting the risk assessment method of choice. META Delta 2911. Available via DIALOG. www.metagroup.com |
| [39] |
Peters, R.J. & Verhoef, C. (2008). Quantifying the yield of risk-bearing IT-portfolios. To appear in Science of Computer Programming. Available via DIALOG. http://www.cs.vu.nl/~x/yield/yield.pdf |
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
Rubinstein, D. (2007). Standish Group Report: There’s Less Development Chaos Today. Software Development Times. |
| [45] |
Schwartz, E.S. & Trigeorgis, L. (2001). Real Options and Investment under Uncertainty. MIT Press. |
| [46] |
Seacord, R.C., Plakosh, D. & Lewis, G.A. (2003). Modernizing Legacy Systems. Addison-Wesley. |
| [47] |
Smith, P.G. & Reinertsen, D.G. (1997). Developing Products in Half the Time: New Rules, New Tools, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons. |
| [48] |
Taft, D.K. (2003). MicroFocus moves mainframe apps to .Net. Available via DIALOG. http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1372 573,00.asp Cited in August 2007 |
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
Torchiano, M. & Morislo, M. (2004). Overlooked aspects of COTS-based development. IEEE Software, March/April, 88-93 |
| [51] |
Trigeorgis, L. (1995). Real option: an overview. In: Trigeorgis, L. (eds.) Real Options in Capital Investment: Models, Strategies, and Applications. Praeger Publishers. |
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
Uhlrich, W.M. (2002). Legacy Systems Transformation Strategies. Prentice Hall. |
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
Ward, J. & Griffiths, P.M. (1996). Strategic Planning for Information Systems, 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons. |
| [59] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |