Conflict analysis approaches for investigating attitudes and misperceptions in the War of 1812

Abstract

Formal systems engineering approaches to modeling misperceptions and attitudes are employed within the framework of the graph model for conflict resolution to systematically study the War of 1812 between the United States of America and Great Britain in order to provide enhanced insights into the causes of the war. More specifically, relational definitions for preferences, movements and stability concepts are defined for describing the attitudes and associated behavior of decision makers involved in a conflict. To capture misperceptions of decision makers in the War of 1812, attitudes are studied within the structure of a hypergame. Combining attitudes and misperceptions within the paradigm of the graph model furnishes the flexible analytical tool which demonstrates that misunderstanding of attitudes by Great Britain and the United States may have contributed to the outbreak of this nasty war.

Keywords

Attitudes / conflict analysis / graph model for conflict resolution / misperceptions / relational stability concepts / War of 1812

References

[1] Benn C.. The War of 1812, 2003, New York: Routledge

[2] Borneman W. R.. 1812: The War that Forged a Nation, 2004, New York: HarperCollins

[3] Burton P.. The Invasion of Canada, 1980, Toronto: McLelland and Stewart

[4] Coles H. L.. The War of 1812, 1965, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press

[5] Fang L., Hipel K. W., Kilgour D.. Interactive Decision Making: The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution, 1993, New York: Wiley

[6] Fort George National Historic Site of Canada (2003). Parks Canada — Fort George National Historic Site of Canada — Learning Experiences — Loyalists. In: Fort George. Available via http://www.pc.gc.ca/lhnnhs/on/fortgeorge/edu/edu10i_E.asp. Cited December 29, 2005

[7] Fraser N., Hipel K. W.. Conflict Analysis: Models and Resolutions, 1984, New York: North-Holland.

[8] Government of Ontario, (2005). The War of 1812 — Setting the Stage. In: Government of Ontario Archives. Available via http://www.archives.gov.on.ca/english/exhib its/1812/setting_the_stage.htm. Cited January 2, 2006

[9] Hamouda L., Kilgour D. M., Hipel K. W.. Strength of preference in graph models for multiple decision-maker conflicts. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2006, 179: 314-327.

[10] Heidler D., Heidler J.. The War of 1812, 2002, Westport: Greenwood Press

[11] Horsman R.. The Causes of the War of 1812. Pennsylvania, 1962, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press

[12] Howard N.. Paradoxes of Rationality: Theory of Metagames and Political Behaviour, 1971, Cambridge: MIT Press

[13] Li K. W., Kilgour D.M., Hipel K. W.. Status quo analysis in the graph model for conflict resolution. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2005, 56: 699-707.

[14] Li K. W., Hipel K. W., Kilgour D. L., Fang L.. Preference uncertainty in the graph model for conflict resolution. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics Part A, 2004, 34(4): 507-520.

[15] Libraries and Archives Canada, (2002). Introduction — War of 1812 — From colony to country: A reader’s guide to Canadian military history. In: Collections Canada. Available via http://www.collectionscanada.ca/military/h13-5001-e.html. Cited January 4, 2006

[16] Obeidi A., Hipel K. W., Kilgour D. M.. The role of emotions in envisioning outcomes in conflict analysis. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2005, 14(6): 481-500.

[17] Nash J.F.. Equilibrium points in n-player games. Proceedings National Academy of Sciences, 1950, 36: 48-49.

[18] Nash J.F.. Non-cooperative games. Annals of Mathematics, 1951, 54(2): 286-295.

[19] Patterson B. R.. The Generals: Andrew Jackson, Sir Edward Packenham and the Road to the Battle of New Orleans, 2005, New York: New York University Press

[20] Perkins B.. Prologue to War; England and the United States, 1961, Los Angeles: University of California Press

[21] Sears L.M.. Jefferson and the Embargo, 1927, New York City: Octagon Books

[22] US Army, (2001). Chapter 6, the War of 1812. In: American Military History. Available via: http://www.army.mil/cmh-pg/books/amh/amh-06.htm. Cited September 23, 2005

[23] Wang M., Hipel K.W., Fraser N.M.. Modeling misperceptions in games. Behavioral Science, 1988, 33(3): 207-223.