A calculus for services innovation

Abstract

Innovation in the services area — especially in the electronic services (e-services) domain — can be systematically developed by first considering the strategic drivers and foci, then the tactical principles and enablers, and finally the operational decision attributes, all of which constitute a process or calculus of services innovation. More specifically, there are four customer drivers (i.e., collaboration, customization, integration and adaptation), three business foci (i.e., creation-focused, solution-focused and competition-focused), six business principles (i.e., reconstruct market boundaries, focus on the big picture not numbers, reach beyond existing demand, get strategic sequence right, overcome organizational hurdles and build execution into strategy), eight technical enablers (i.e., software algorithms, automation, telecommunication, collaboration, standardization, customization, organization, and globalization), and six attributes of decision informatics (i.e., decision-driven, information-based, real-time, continuously-adaptive, customer-centric and computationally-intensive). It should be noted that the four customer drivers are all directed at empowering the individual — that is, at recognizing that the individual can, respectively, contribute in a collaborative situation, receive customized or personalized attention, access an integrated system or process, and obtain adaptive real-time or just-in-time input. The developed process or calculus serves to identify the potential white spaces or blue oceans for innovation. In addition to expanding on current innovations in services and related experiences, white spaces are identified for possible future innovations; they include those that can mitigate the unforeseen consequences or abuses of earlier innovations, safeguard our rights to privacy, protect us from the always-on, interconnected world, provide us with an authoritative search engine, and generate a GDP metric that can adequately measure the growing knowledge economy, one driven by intangible ideas and services innovation.

Keywords

Services / innovation / decision informatics / software algorithms / automation / globalization / collaboration / customization / integration / adaptation / standardization / telecommunication / organization / business principles

References

[1] AyacheN., FaugerasO.. Maintaining representations of the environment of mobile robot. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 1989, 5(6): 804-819

[2] BaumolW. J., Batey-BlackmanS. A., WolffE. N.Productivity and American Leadership: The Long View, 1989, Cambridge, MA: John Wiley & Sons

[3] Berg, D. & Einspruch, N. G. (2006). Analyzing corporate innovation using the data surface mining technique. Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, Singapore, June 21–23, 2006

[4] Berg, D. & Einspruch, N. G. (2007). Analyzing domestic and international corporate innovation using the data surface mining technique. International Journal for Innovation and Technology Management. to be published

[5] BergD., TienJ. M., WallaceW. A.. Guest editorial: technology management in the service industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management: Special Cluster, 2001, 148(3): 330-332

[6] CairncrossF.The Death of Distance: How the Communications Revolution Is Changing Our Lives, 1997, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press

[7] ChesbroughH. W.Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, 2003, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press

[8] Christensen, C. M., Anthony, S. D., Berstell, G. & Nitterhouse, D. (2007). Finding the right job for your product. MIT Sloan Management Review, Spring, 2–11

[9] CorradoC., HultenC., SichelD.Intangible Capital and Economic Growth, 2005, Baltimore, MD: Federal Reserve Board

[10] DavenportT. H., HarrisJ. G.Competing on Analytics: The New Science of Winning, 2007, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press

[11] DychtwaldK., EricksonT. J., MorisonR.Workforce Crisis: How to Beat the Coming Shortage of Skills and Talent, 2006, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press

[12] EricksonT. J., MorisonR.Workforce Crisis: How to Beat the Coming Shortage of Skills and Talent, 2006, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press

[13] FriedmanT. L.The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century, 2005, New York, NY: Farrar, Strauss & Giroux

[14] Garvey, T. D., Lowrance, J. D. & Fischler, M. A. (1981). An inference technique for integrating knowledge from disparate sources. Proceedings of the Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 319–325

[15] GershenfeldN. A.FAB: The Coming Revolution on Your Desktop-From Personal Computers to Personal Fabrication, 2005, Boston, MA: Basic Books

[16] GovindarajanV., TrimbleC.Ten Rules for Strategic Innovators: From Idea to Execution, 2005, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press

[17] GunatilakaA.H., BaertleinB. A.. Feature-level and decision-level fusion of noncoincidently sampled sensors for land mine detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2001, 23(6): 577-589

[18] HallowellE. M., M.D.CrazyBusy: Overstretched, Overbooked, and About to Snap! Strategies for Coping in a World Gone ADD, 2006, New York, NY: Ballantine Books

[19] HammondJ. S., KeeneyR. L., RaiffaH.Smart Choices: A Practical Guide to Making Better Decisions, 1999, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press

[20] KimW. C., MauborgneR.Blue Ocean Strategy: How to Create Uncontested Market Space and Make the Competition Irrelevant, 2005, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press

[21] MooreG. A.Dealing With Darwin: How Great Companies Innovate at Every Phase of Their Evolution, 2005, London, Penguin Books

[22] MooreG. E.. Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electronics, 1965, 38(8): 38-41

[23] National Academy of Engineering.The Great Achievements Project, 2000, Washington, DC, National Academies Press

[24] Nature. (2005). Internet encyclopedias go head to head. Nature, 438 (15): 900–901

[25] National Science FoundationPartnerships for Innovation, 2006, Washington, DC, NSF 06-550

[26] Norwegian Ministry of Industry and Trade (NMIT) (2006). Innovation in Services: Typology, Case Studies and Policy Implications. ECON Report 2006-025, February, Oslo, Norway

[27] Organisation for Economic CooperationDevelopmentEnhancing the Performance of the Service Sector: Promoting Innovation in Services, 2005, Paris, France, OECD Publications

[28] PalmisanoS. J.Global Innovation Outlook, 2004, Armonk, NY: IBM

[29] ParasuramanA., ZeithamlV.A., BerryL. L.. Servqual: a multiple item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 1998, 64(1): 12-40

[30] PineB. J.II, GilmoreJ.H.The Experience Economy, 1999, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press

[31] QuinnJ. B., BaruchJ. J., PaquetteP. C.. Technology in services. Scientific American, 1987, 257(6): 50-58

[32] SanfordL. S., TaylorD.Let Go To Grow: Escaping the Commodity Trap, 2005, NJ, Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River

[33] Surowiecki, J. (2005). Technology and happiness. Technology Review, January: 72–76

[34] TienJ. M.. On automated correctional data systems. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 1986, 10(3/4): 157-163

[35] TienJ. M.. Individual-centered cducation: an any one, any time, any where approach to engineering educatiosn. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part C: Special Issue on Systems Engineering Education, 2000, 30(2): 213-218

[36] TienJ. M.. Towards a decision iInformatics paradigm: a real-time, information-based approach to decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 2003, 33(1): 102-113

[37] TienJ. M.. Viewing urban disruptions from a decision informatics perspective. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2005, 14(3): 257-288

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Systems Engineering Society of China & Springer-Verlag