Knowledge sciences and Nanatsudaki: A new model of knowledge creation processes

Abstract

The paper starts from a discussion of the concepts of knowledge management versus technology management, and the emergence of knowledge sciences. This is followed be a summary of recent results in the theory of knowledge creation. Most of them concern diverse spirals of creative interplay between rational (explicit) and intuitive or emotional (tacit) aspects of knowledge. Some of them concentrate on organizational (market or purpose-oriented) knowledge creation, other describe academic (research-oriented) knowledge creation. The problem addressed in this paper is how to integrate diverse spirals of knowledge creation into a prescriptive or exemplar model that would help to overcome the differences between organizational (market-oriented) and normal academic knowledge creation. As such prescriptive approach, the JAIST Nanatsudaki Model of knowledge creation is proposed. It consists of seven spirals, known from other studies, but integrated in a sequence resulting from the experience of authors in practical management of research activities. Not all of these spirals have to be fully utilized, depending on a particular application, but all of them relate to some essential aspects of either academic or organizational knowledge creation. The paper presents Nanatsudaki Model in detail with comments on consecutive spirals. The results of a survey of opinions about creativity conditions at JAIST indicate the importance of many spirals constituting the Nanatsudaki Model. Directions of further testing the Nanatsudaki Model are indicated.

Keywords

Knowledge creation / descriptive and prescriptive models / knowledge management

References

[1] Bertallanfy L.. General systems theory. General Systems, 1956, 1: 1-10.

[2] Bush V.. The differential analyzer. a new machine for solving differential equations. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 1931, 212: 447-488.

[3] Checkland P.B.. The origins and nature of “hard” systems thinking. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 1978, 5: 99

[4] Checkland P.B.. Soft systems methodology as a process; a reply to M.C. Jackson. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 1982, 9: 37

[5] Clark C.. Brainstorming: How to Create Successful Ideas, 1958, Hollywood Ca: Melvin Powers Wilshire Book Co.

[6] Davenport T., Prusak L.. Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know, 1998, Boston Ma: Harvard Business School Press

[7] Foucault M.. The Order of Things: An Archeology of Human Sciences, 1972, New York: Routledge

[8] Gadamer H.-G.. Warheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophishen Hermeneutik, 1960, Tübingen: J.B.C. Mohr (Siebeck)

[9] Gasson S.. Sprague R.J.. The management of distributed organizational knowledge. Proceedings of the 37 Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences (HICSS 37), 2004, Los Alamitos, Ca: IEEE Computer Society Press

[10] Guilford J.P.. The Nature of Human Intelligence, 1967, New York: McGraw-Hill

[11] Heidegger M.. Heidegger M.. Die Technik und die Kehre. Vorträge und Aufsätze, 1954, Pfullingen: Günther Neske Verlag

[12] Jackson M.C.. Systems Approaches to Management, 2000, London-New York: Kluwer Academic — Plenum Publishers

[13] Kunifuji, S. (2004). Creativity support systems in JAIST. In: Proceedings of JAIST Forum 2004: Technology Creation based on Knowledge Science, pp 56–58

[14] Kuhn T.S.. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 1970, 2nd ed. Chicago: Chicago University Press

[15] Latour, B. (1990). Science in action, in: Postmodern? No, Simply A-modern! Steps Towards an Anthropology of Science. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 21

[16] Laudan, R. (ed.) (1984). The Nature of Technological Knowledge. Are Models of Scientific Change Relevant? Reidel, Dordrecht

[17] Lucertini M., Gasca A.M., Nicolo F.. Technological Concepts and Mathematical Models in the Evolution of Modern Engineering Systems, 2004, Basel: Birkhauser.

[18] Ma, T., Liu, S. & Nakamori, Y. (2004). Roadmapping for Supporting Scientific Research. Proceedings of MCDM 2004 (17th International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Whistler, Canada), Simon Fraser University

[19] Marcuse H.. One-Dimensional Man, 1964, Boston: Beacon Press

[20] Midgley G.. Systems Thinking, 2003, London: Sage Publications

[21] Motycka A.. Nauka a nieświadomość (Science and Unconscious, in Polish), 1998, Wrocław: Leopoldinum

[22] Nakamori, Y. (2000). Knowledge Management System Toward Sustainable Society. In: Proceedings of First International Symposium on Knowledge and System Sciences, JAIST, pp 57–64

[23] Nakamori Y., Sawaragi Y.. Shinayakana Systems Approach in Environmental Management. Proceedings of 11th World Congress of International Federation of Automatic Control, Tallin. Pergamon Press, 1990, 5: 511-516.

[24] Nonaka I., Takeuchi H.. The Knowledge-Creating Company. How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, 1995, New York: Oxford University Press

[25] Nyquist H.. Regeneration theory. Bell System Technical Journal, 1932, 11: 126-147.

[26] Oppelt W.. Kleines Handbuch Technischer Regelvorgänge, 1953, Frankfurt: Verlag Chemie

[27] Osborn A.F.. Applied Imagination, 1957, New York: Scribner

[28] Pfeffer J., Sutton R.I.. The Knowing — Doing Gap: How Smart Companies Turn Knowledge Into Action, 2000, Boston, Ma.: Harvard Business School Press

[29] Phaal R., Farrukh C., Probert D.. Technology roadmappingg a planning framework for evolution and revolution. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2004, 71: 5-26.

[30] Popper K.R.. Objective Knowledge, 1972, Oxford: Oxford University Press

[31] Salo A., Cuhls K.. Technology Foresight — Past and Future. Journal of Forecasting, 2003, 22(2–3): 79-82.

[32] Snow C.P.. The Two Cultures, 1960, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

[33] Torrance E.P.. The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms-Technical Manual, 1966, Princeton: NJ: Personal Press

[34] Tian, J., Wierzbicki, A.P., Ren H. & Nakamori, Y. (2006). A study on knowledge creation support in a Japanese research institute. In: Proceedings of KSEM2006

[35] Wiener N.. Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine, 1948, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press

[36] Wierzbicki A.P.. On the role of intuition in decision making and some ways of multicriteria aid of intuition. Multiple Criteria Decision Making, 1997, 6: 65-78.

[37] Wierzbicki A.P.. Knowledge creation theories and rational theory of intuition. International Journal for Knowledge and Systems Science, 2004, 1: 17-25.

[38] Wierzbicki A.P.. Technology and change: the role of technology in knowledge civilization, 2005, Kobe: Ith World Congress of IFSR

[39] Wierzbicki A.P., Nakamori Y.. Creative space: a tool for knowledge integration. International Journal for Knowledge and Systems Science, 2004, 1: 26:32

[40] Wierzbicki A.P., Nakamori Y.. Creative Space: Models of Creative Processes for the Knowledge Civilization Age, 2006, Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.

[41] Wierzbicki A.P., Tian J., Ren H.. The Use of Reference Profiles and Multiple Criteria Evaluation in Knowledge Acquisition from Large Databases. VEAM_IFIP Working Group 7.6 Workshop on Virtual Environments for Advanced Modeling, 2006, Germany: University of Hamburg

[42] Wiig K.M.. Knowledge management: an introduction and perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 1997, 1(1): 145-156.

[43] Willyard C.H., McClees C.W.. Motorola’s technology roadmap process. Research Management, 1987, 30(5): 13-19.