An approach to group decision making based on interval fuzzy preference relations

Yunliang Jiang

Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› 2007, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (1) : 113 -120.

PDF
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› 2007, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (1) : 113 -120. DOI: 10.1007/s11518-006-5026-2
Technical Note

An approach to group decision making based on interval fuzzy preference relations

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate group decision making problems where the decision information given by decision makers takes the form of interval fuzzy preference relations. We first give an index to measure the similarity degree of two interval fuzzy preference relations, and utilize the similarity index to check the consistency degree of group opinion. Furthermore, we use the error-propagation principle to determine the priority vector of the aggregated matrix, and then develop an approach to group decision making based on interval fuzzy preference relations. Finally, we give an example to illustrate the developed approach.

Keywords

Group decision making / interval fuzzy preference relation / similarity index / aggregation

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yunliang Jiang. An approach to group decision making based on interval fuzzy preference relations. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2007, 16(1): 113-120 DOI:10.1007/s11518-006-5026-2

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Arrow K. J.. Social Choice and Individual Values, 1966, New York: Academic Press

[2]

Bouchon-Meunier B. B., Foulloy L., et al. Intelligent Systems for Information Processing, 2003, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

[3]

Chiclana F., Herrera F., et al. Integrating multiplicative preference relations in a multipurpose decision-making model based on fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2001, 122: 277-291.

[4]

Chiclana F., Herrera F., et al. Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1998, 97: 33-48.

[5]

Fodor J., Roubens M.. Fuzzy Preference Modelling and Multicriteria Decision Support, 1994, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

[6]

Herrera F., Herrera-Viedma E., et al. A fusion approach for managing multi-granularity linguistic term sets in decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000, 114: 43-58.

[7]

Herrera-Viedma E., Herrera F., et al. Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 154: 98-109.

[8]

Hwang C.L., Yoon K.. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, 1981, Berlin: Springer.

[9]

Kacprzyk J., Fedrizzi M.. Multiperson Decision Making Models Using Fuzzy Sets and Possibility Theory, 1990, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

[10]

Kacprzyk J.. Group decision making with a fuzzy linguistic majority. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1986, 18: 105-118.

[11]

Lipovetsky S., Conklin W.M.. Robust estimation of priorities in the AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 137: 110-122.

[12]

Nurmi H. Approaches to collective decision making with fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1981, 6: 249-259.

[13]

Orlovski S. A.. Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1978, 1: 155-167.

[14]

Tanino T.. Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1984, 12: 117-131.

[15]

Xu C. F., Geng W. D., et al. A fuzzy neural network method for the fusion of communication intercept information. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 2000, 37(10): 1212-1217.

[16]

Xu C. F., Geng W. D., et al. Multi-hierarchical blackboard model for communication intercept information fusion. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2001, 29(3): 361-363.

[17]

Xu R. N., Zhai X. Y.. Extensions of the analytic hierarchy process in fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1992, 52: 251-257.

[18]

Xu Z. S., Da Q. L.. A least deviation method to obtain a priority vector of a fuzzy preference relation. European Journal of Operational Research, 2005, 164: 206-216.

[19]

Xu Z. S.. Study on relation between two classes of scales in AHP. Systems Engineering — Theory & Practice, 1999, 19(7): 97-101.

[20]

Xu Z. S.. Algorithm for priority of fuzzy complementary judgment matrix. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2001, 16(4): 311-314.

[21]

Xu Z. S.. A practical method for priority of interval number complementary judgment matrix. Operations Research and Management Science, 2001, 10(1): 16-19.

[22]

Xu Z. S.. Uncertain Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, 2004, Beijing: Tsinghua University Press

[23]

Yager R. R., Kacprzyk J.. The Ordered Weighted Averaging Operators: Theory, Methodology and Applications, 1997, Norwell: Kluwer Academic Publishers

[24]

Yoon K.. The propagation of errors in multiple-attribute decision analysis: a practical approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1989, 40: 681-686.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

149

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/