An effective multiple criteria approach to infrastructure reconstruction in devastated countries

Abstract

Infrastruture facilities in many countries have been repeatedly subjected to natural or human-induced disasters. International aid institutions, such as the United Nations Development Program (UNDP), United States Aid International Development (USAID), Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and the World Bank International Aid Development (IDA), are endeavoring to assist in the reconstruction of devastated countries. Development institutions normally face the problem of selecting and implementing relevant priority infrastructure projects that are needed in various sectors. Usually there are also several key local players in the decision making process. In many cases, these main decision makers have contradictory objectives that lead to conflict and thereby hamper the reconstruction process. In response to this kind of problem, an effective approach has been developed within the field of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), that can assist decision makers in prioritizing projects to meet specified goals and objectives. Using the AHP approach, the problem of selecting infrastructure projects is dealt with systematically when applying this flexible MCDA technique. This approach takes into account possible uncertainties and social discrepancies, and can use the judgments of the decision makers themselves when there is a lack of technical or historical data. Decision makers from international financial aid institutions, donor agencies, governmental and the local community can utilize this proposed approach.

Keywords

Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) / conflicts / infrastructure reconstruction / multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA)

References

[1] Ayyub B. M.. Ayyub G.. The nature of uncertainty in structural engineering. Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis: Theory and Application, 1994, Amsterdam: North-Holland-Elsevier Scientific Publishers 195-210.

[2] Bots P.W.G., Lootsma F.A.. Decision support in the public sector. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 2000, 9: 1-6.

[3] Ezell B., Farr J., Wiese I.. Infrastructure risk analysis model. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 2000, 6(3): 14-117.

[4] Ezell B., Farr J., Wiese I.. Infrastructure risk analysis of municipal water distribution system. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 2000, 6(3): 118-122.

[5] Lathrop, J. (2001). Decision analysis in public participation: experiences, lessons learned, and recommendations. In: Proceeding of the First Annual Conference on Infrastructure Priorities, the Institute for Civil Infrastructure Systems, Washington DC, October 24–26, 2001

[6] Mustafa M., Al-Bahar J.. Project risk assessment using the analytic hierarchy process. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1991, 38(1): 46-52.

[7] PECDAR. Activity Report 1999, 2002, Gaza, Palestine: PECDAR

[8] Ross, D. (2001). Infrastructure needs: a public works perspective. the institute for civil infrastructure systems. In: Proceedings of the First Annual Conference on Infrastructure Priorities. Washington DC, October 24–26, 2001

[9] Saaty T. L.. The Analytic Hierarchy Process, 1980, New York: McGraw-Hill

[10] Saaty T. L.. Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 1996, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: RWS Publications

[11] Warner, K. (2001). Paying for risk? evaluating the role of risk transfer in public infrastructure investment decisions. In: Proceedings of the First Annual Conference on Infrastructure Priorities, the Institute for Civil Infrastructure Systems, Washington DC, October 24–26, 2001

[12] World Bank Country Documents and Reports 1999, Report No. PIC4676. http://www.worldbank.org. Cited January, 2003

[13] World Bank Country Documents and Reports 2000, Implementation Completion Report — Community Development Project, Appraisal Report No. PO47110. http://www.worldbank.org. Cited January, 2003

[14] Ziara M., Nigim K., Enshasi A., Ayyub B.. Strategic implementation of urban infrastructure priority projects. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 2002, 8(1): 1-10.