Designing the optimum configurations of circular and spherical product specifications for multiple quality characteristics

Byung Rae Cho , Michael D. Phillips , Jami Kovach

Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› 2005, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (4) : 385 -399.

PDF
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› 2005, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (4) : 385 -399. DOI: 10.1007/s11518-006-0200-0
Article

Designing the optimum configurations of circular and spherical product specifications for multiple quality characteristics

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

As an integral part of tolerance design in the context of design for six sigma, determining optimal product specifications has become the focus of increased activity, as manufacturing industries strive to increase productivity and improve the quality of their products. Although a number of research papers have been reported in the research community, there is room for improvement. Most existing research papers consider determining optimal specification limits for a single quality characteristic. In this paper, we develop the modeling and optimization procedures for optimum circular and spherical configurations by considering multiple quality characteristics. The concepts of multivariate quality loss function and truncated distribution are incorporated. This has never been adequately addressed, nor has been appropriately applied in industry. A numerical example is shown and comparison studies are made.

Keywords

Circular and spherical specifications / multivariate quality loss function / truncated multivariate distribution / optimization

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Byung Rae Cho, Michael D. Phillips, Jami Kovach. Designing the optimum configurations of circular and spherical product specifications for multiple quality characteristics. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2005, 14(4): 385-399 DOI:10.1007/s11518-006-0200-0

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Bowling S.R., Khasawneh M.T., Kaewkuekool S., Cho B.R.. A Markovian approach to determining optimal process target levels for a multi-stage serial production system. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 159: 636-650.

[2]

Chase K.W., Greenwood W.H., Loosli B.G., Haughlund L.F.. Least-cost tolerances allocation for mechanical assemblies with automated process selection. Manufacturing Review, 1990, 3: 49-59.

[3]

Cho B.R., Leonard M.S.. Identification and extensions of quasiconvex quality loss functions. International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering, 1997, 4: 191-204.

[4]

Cho B.R., Kim Y.J., Kimbler D.L., Phillips M.D.. An integrated joint optimization procedure for robust and tolerance design. International Journal of Production Research, 2000, 38: 2309-2325.

[5]

Cho B.R., Phillips M.D.. Design of the optimum product specifications for s-type quality characteristics. International Journal of Production Research, 1998, 36: 459-474.

[6]

Drezner Z., Wesolowsky G.O.. Multivariate screening procedures for quality cost minimization. IIE Transactions, 1995, 27: 300-304.

[7]

Fathi Y.. Producer-consumer tolerances. Journal of Quality Technology, 1990, 22: 138-145.

[8]

Govindaluri M.S., Shin S., Cho B.R.. Tolerance design using the Lambert W function: an empirical approach. International Journal of Production Research, 2004, 42: 3235-3251.

[9]

Jeang A.. An approach of tolerance design for quality improvement and cost reduction. International Journal of Production Research, 1997, 35: 1193-1211.

[10]

Jeang A.. Robust tolerance design by response surface methodology. International Journal of Production Research, 1999, 37: 3275-3288.

[11]

Kapur K.C., Cho B.R.. Economic design and development of specifications. Quality Engineering, 1994, 6: 401-417.

[12]

Kapur K.C., Cho B.R.. Economic design of the specification region for multiple quality characteristics. IIE Transactions, 1996, 6: 401-417.

[13]

Khasawneh M.T., Bowling S.R., Kaewkuekool S., Cho B.R.. Tables of a truncated standard normal distribution: a singly truncated case. Quality Engineering, 2005, 17: 33-50.

[14]

Khasawneh M.T., Bowling S.R., Kaewkuekool S., Cho B.R.. Tables of a truncated standard normal distribution: a doubly truncated case. Quality Engineering, 2005, 17: 227-241.

[15]

Kim Y.J., Cho B.R.. Economic integration of design optimization. Quality Engineering, 1999, 12: 591-597.

[16]

Kim Y.J., Cho B.R.. The use of response surface designs in the selection of optimum tolerance allocation. Quality Engineering, 2000, 13: 35-42.

[17]

Lee W.J., Woo T.C., Chou S.Y.. Tolerance synthesis for nonlinear systems based on nonlinear programming. IIE Transactions, 1993, 25: 51-61.

[18]

Phillips M.D., Cho B.R.. An empirical approach to designing product specifications: a case study. Quality Engineering, 1998, 11: 91-100.

[19]

Pignatiello J.J.. Strategies for robust multiresponse quality engineering. IIE Transactions, 1993, 25: 5-15.

[20]

Sarkar A., Pal S.. Estimation of process capability index for concentricity. Quality Engineering, 1997, 9: 665-671.

[21]

Speckhart F.H.. Calculation of tolerance based on a minimum cost approach. Journal of Engineering for Industry, 1972, 94: 447-453.

[22]

Spotts M.F.. Allocation of tolerances to minimize cost of assembly. Journal of Engineering for Industry, 1973, 95: 762-764.

[23]

Tang K.. Economic design of product specifications for a complete inspection plan. International Journal of Production Research, 1988, 26: 203-217.

[24]

Tang K., Tang J.. Design of product specifications for multi-characteristic inspection. Management Science, 1989, 35: 743-756.

[25]

Tang K., Tang J.. Design of screening procedures: A review. Journal of Quality Technology, 1994, 26: 209-226.

[26]

Taguchi G.. Introduction to Quality Engineering, 1985, Michigan: American Supplier Institute

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

131

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/