Comparison of the analytic network process and the graph model for conflict resolution

Abstract

A comparison of two decision analysis tools for the analysis of strategic conflicts, the Analytic Network Process (ANP) and the graph model for conflict resolution, is carried out by applying them to the China-US TV dumping conflict. Firstly, the graph model is introduced along with practical procedures for modeling and analyzing conflicts using the decision support software, GMCR II. Next, ANP is explained, emphasizing structural features and procedures for synthesizing priorities. Then a framework for employing ANP to analyze strategic conflicts is designed and used to compare ANP to the graph model. The case study of the China-US TV dumping conflict provides a basis for the graph model and ANP to be compared; different features of the approaches are highlighted. The study shows that because of different theoretical backgrounds, ANP and the graph model for conflict analysis both provide useful information which can be combined to furnish a better understanding of a strategic conflict.

Keywords

Strategic conflict / graph model for conflict resolution / Analytic Network Process / decision support system / China-US TV dumping conflict

References

[1] Alexander J. M.. Priorities and preferences in conflict resolution. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 1993, 25(2): 108-119.

[2] Chinese Embassy in US, News Release: China says US verdict on color TV dumping “unfair” to Chinese, www.china-embassy.org/eng/zt/1/t84722.htm, accessed on November 30, 2004.

[3] Daniel D.. Conflict Resolution, 2000, New York: McGraw-Hill

[4] Fang L., Hipel K. W., Kilgour D.M.. Interactive Decision Making: The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution, 1993, New York: Wiley

[5] Fang L., Hipel K. W., Kilgour D. M., Peng X.. A decision support system for interactive decision making, part 1: model formulation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C, 2003, 33(1): 42-55.

[6] Fang L., Hipel K. W., Kilgour D. M., Peng X.. A decision support system for interactive decision making, part 2: analysis and output interpretation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C, 2003, 33(1): 56-66.

[7] Fraser N. M., Hipel K.W.. Conflict Analysis: Models and Resolutions, 1984, New York: North Holland

[8] Hipel K. W., Kilgour D. M., Fang L., Peng X.. Strategic support for the services industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2001, 48(3): 358-369.

[9] Howard N.. Paradoxes of Rationality: Theory of Metagames and Political Behavior, 1971, Cambridge: MIT Press

[10] Labor Research Association, US Commerce Dept. slaps anti-dumping duties on Chinese color TVs, http://www.laborresearch.org/story.php?id=339, accessed on November 30, 2004.

[11] Myerson R. B.. Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict, 1991, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

[12] Noakes D., Fang J. L., Hipel K. W., Kilgour D. M.. An examination of the salmon aquaculture conflict in British Columbia using the graph model for conflict resolution. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 2003, 10: 1-15.

[13] Obeidi A., Hipel K. W., Kilgour D. M.. Canadian bulk water exports: analyzing the Sun Belt conflict using the graph model for conflict resolution. Knowledge, Technology, and Policy, 2002, 14(4): 145-163.

[14] Pawlak Z.. An inquiry into anatomy of conflicts. Journal of Information Sciences, 1998, 109: 65-78.

[15] Pawlak Z.. Some remarks on conflict analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 2005, 166(3): 649-654.

[16] Saaty T. L.. Analytic hierarchy process, 1980, New York: McGraw Hill

[17] Saaty T. L.. The Analytic Network Process: Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback, 2001, 2nd ed. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications

[18] Saaty T. L., Alexander J. M.. Conflict Resolution: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, 1989, New York: Praeger

[19] US Department of Commerce, Anti-dumping duty investigations on imports of certain color television receivers from Malaysia and the People’s Republic of China, www.ita.doc.gov/media/FactSheet/1103/tv-fs-112403.html, accessed on November 30, 2004.

[20] Vargas L. G.. Book reviews of conflict analysis: models and resolutions-Fraser, N. M. and Hipel, K. W.. European Journal of Operational Research, 1985, 21(2): 280-281.

[21] von Neumann J., Morgenstern O.. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 1953, 3rd ed. New Jersey: Princeton University Press