Decision making — the Analytic Hierarchy and Network Processes (AHP/ANP)

Abstract

This is the first part of an introduction to multicriteria decision making using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and its generalization, the Analytic Network Process (ANP). The discussion involves individual and group decisions both with the independence of the criteria from the alternatives as in the AHP and also with dependence and feedback in the entire decision structure as in the ANP. This part explains the Analytic Hierarchy Process, with examples, and presents in some detail the mathematical foundations. An exposition of the Analytic Network Process and its applications will appear in later issues of this journal.

Keywords

Decision making / Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) / Analytic Network Process (ANP)

References

[1] Bauer R.A., Collar E., Tang V.. The Silverlake Project, 1992, New York: Oxford University Press

[2] Harker P.T.. Derivatives of the perron root of a positive reciprocal matrix: with applications to the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Appl. Math. Comput., 1987, 22: 217-232.

[3] Horn R.A., Johnson C.R.. Matrix Analysis, 1985, New York: Cambridge University Press.

[4] Saaty T.L.. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1977, 15(3): 234-281.

[5] Saaty, T.L., “Rank generation, preservation, and reversal in the Analytic Hierarchy Decision Process,” Journal of the Decision Sciences Institute, Vol. 18, No. 2, 1987.

[6] Saaty T.L.. How to make a decision: the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Interfaces, 1994, 24(6): 19-43.

[7] Saaty T.L.. The Analytic Hierarchy Process, 1980, New York: McGraw Hill.

[8] Saaty T.L.. Fundamentals of Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 2000, 4922 Ellsworth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213: RWS Publications

[9] Saaty T.L.. Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process, 2001, 4922 Ellsworth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213: RWS Publications

[10] Saaty, T.L., “Time dependent decision-making; dynamic priorities in the AHP/ANP; generalizing from points to functions and from real to complex variables”, Proceedings of the ISAHP 2003, Bali, Indonesia, August 7–9, 2003.

[11] Saaty T.L., Ozdemir M.. Why the magic number seven plus or minus two. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2003, 38: 233-244.

[12] Saaty T.L., Ozdemir M.. Negative priorities in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2003, 37: 1063-1075.

[13] Saaty, T.L. and L.G. Vargas, “Inconsistency and rank preservation,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 28, No. 2, June 1984a.

[14] Saaty T.L., Vargas L.G.. Comparison of eigenvalue, logarithmic least squares and least squares methods in estimating ratios. Mathematical Modelling, 1984, 5(5): 309-324.

[15] Saaty T.L., Vargas L.G.. Experiments on rank preservation and reversal in relative measurement. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 1993, 17(s.4–5): 13-18.

[16] Saaty, T.L. and L.G. Vargas, “The possibility of group choice: pairwise comparisons and merging functions,” Submitted to Math of OR, 2003.

[17] Saaty T.L., Vargas L.G., Dellmann K.. The allocation of intangible resources: the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Linear Programming. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2003, 37: 169-184.

[18] Saaty T.L., Kearns K.P.. Analytical Planning; The Organization of Systems, 1985, Oxford: Pergamon Press Translated to Russian. Paperback edition, RWS Publications, 4922 Ellsworth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, Pittsburgh, 1991