Systems methodology and mathematical models for knowledge management

Yoshiteru Nakamori

Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› 2003, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (1) : 49 -72.

PDF
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› 2003, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (1) : 49 -72. DOI: 10.1007/s11518-006-0120-z
Article

Systems methodology and mathematical models for knowledge management

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

This paper first introduces a new discipline knowledge science and the role of systems science in its development. Then, after the discussion on current trend in systems science, the paper proposes a new systems methodology for knowledge management and creation. Finally, the paper discusses mathematical modeling techniques to represent and manage human knowledge that is essentially vague and context-dependent.

Keywords

Service sector / systems engineering / information technology / decision technologies / customer-centric / productivity

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yoshiteru Nakamori. Systems methodology and mathematical models for knowledge management. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2003, 12(1): 49-72 DOI:10.1007/s11518-006-0120-z

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Alter, S., Information Systems: A Management Perspective. 2nd ed, Benjamin/Cummings Publishing, 1996.

[2]

Beckman, T., “A Methodology for Knowledge Management”, International Association of Science and Technology for Development (IASTED) AI and Soft Computing Conference, Banff, Canada. 1997.

[3]

Hayashi C.. On the prediction of phenomena for quantitative data and the quantification of qualitative data from the mathematico-statistical point of view. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 1952, 3: 121-143.

[4]

Dubois D., Prade H.. Ranking fuzzy numbers in setting of possibility theory. Information Sciences, 1983, 30: 183-224.

[5]

Jackson M. C.. Towards coherent pluralism in management science. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1999, 50: 12-22.

[6]

Liebowitzed ed. J., Knowledge Management Handbook. CRC Press, 1999

[7]

Kruse R., Gebhardt J., Klawonn F.. Lowen R., Roubens M.. Numerical and Llogical Aapproaches to Fuzzy Set Theory by the Context Model. Fuzzy Logic: State of the Art, 1993, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers 365-376.

[8]

Nakamori, Y. and Ryoke, M., Fuzzy Data Analysis for Three-Way Data. Joint 9th IFSA World Congress and 20th NAFIPS International Conference-Fuzziness and Soft Computing in the New Millenium, Vancouver, Canada, June 25–28, pp2189–2194, 2001.

[9]

Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H., The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, Oxford University Press, 1995.

[10]

Nonaka I., Toyama R., Konno N.. SEKI, ba and leadership:a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning, 2000, 33: 5-34.

[11]

Tanaka H.. Fuzzy data analysis by possibilistic linear models. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1987, 24: 363-375.

[12]

Tanaka, H. and Ishibuchi, H., Soft Data Analysis, Asakura Shoten, 1995 (in Japanese).

[13]

Tobin, D., Transformation Learning: Reasoning Your Company through Knowledge and Skills, John Wiley & Sons, 1996.

[14]

Turban, E., Expert Systems and Applied Artificial Intelligence, Macmillan, 1992.

[15]

Woolf, ed. H., Webster’s New World Dictionary of the American Language. G. and C. Merrian, 1990.

[16]

Zadeh L. A.. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 1965, 8: 338-353.

[17]

Zadeh L. A.. Outline of a new approach to the analysis of complex systems and decision processes. IEEE Trans. Syst, Man, Cybern, 1973, 3: 28-44.

[18]

Zadeh L. A.. The concept of a linguistic variables and its application to approximate reasoning, part 1. Information Sciences, 1975, 8: 199-249.

[19]

Zhu Z. C.. The practice of multi-modal approaches, the challenge of cross-cultural communication, and the search for responses. Human Relations, 1999, 52(5): 579-607.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

148

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/