Increasing returns to scale, dynamics of industrial structure and size distribution of firms

Abstract

A multi-agent model is presented to discuss the market dynamics and the size distribution of firms. The model emphasizes the effects of increasing returns to scale and gives the description of the born and death of adaptive producers. The evolution of market structure and its behavior under the technological shocks are investigated. Its dynamical results are in good agreement with some empirical “stylized facts” of industrial evolution. With the diversity of demand and adaptive growth strategies of firms, the firm size in the generalized model obeys the power-law distribution. Three factors mainly determine the competitive dynamics and the skewed size distributions of firms: 1. Self-reinforcing mechanism; 2. Adaptive firm growing strategies; 3. Demand diversity or widespread heterogeneity in the technological capabilities of firms.

Keywords

Increasing returns / industry dynamics / size distribution of firms

References

[1] Arthur W.B.. Anderson P.W., Arrow K.J., Pines D.. The self-reinforcing mechanism in economic systems. the Economy: as an Evolving Complex System, 1988, Berlin: Springer

[2] Arthur W.B.. Complexity in Economics and Financial Markets. Complexity, 1995, 1(1): 20-25.

[3] Arthur, W.B., Durlauf, S.N. & Lane, D. (eds.) (1997). The economy as an evolving complex systems II—Santa Fe institute studies in the sciences of complexity, Addison Wesley Longman

[4] Aruka Y.. Evolutionary Controversies in Economics: A New Transdisciplinary Approach, 2001, Berlin: Springer-Verlag

[5] Axtell R.L.. Zipf distribution of U.S. firm size. Science, 2001, 293: 1818-1820.

[6] Axtell, R.L. (2001). The emergence of firms in a population of agent: local increasing returns, unstable Nash equilibria, and power law size distribution. CSED Working Paper No. 3, Brookings Institution

[7] Barr J., Saraceno F.. A Computational Theory of the Firm. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2002, 49: 345-361.

[8] Baumol W.J., Panzar J.C., Willig R.D.. Contestable Markets: An Uprising in the Theory of Industry Structure: reply. American Economics Review, 1983, 73(3): 491-496.

[9] Baumol W.J., Panzar J.C., Willig R.D.. Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industrial Structure, 1988, rev. ed. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Academic Press

[10] Bloch, H. (2004). The Growth of Firms and the Evolution of Industries, February 18, UCSB, economics seminar, http://econ.ucalgary.ca/research/ucsb%20revised%20seminar%20handouts.pdf

[11] Bonabeau, E., Theraulaz, G., et al (1997). Self-organization in Social Insects. Trend in Ecology and Evolution, (12): 188–193

[12] Dosi G., Nelson R.R.. An introduction to evolutionary theories in economics. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1994, 4(3): 153-172.

[13] Fujiwaraa Y., Di Guilmib C., et al. Do Pareto-Zipf and Gibrat laws hold true? An analysis with European firms. Physica A, 2004, 335: 197-216.

[14] Gaffeo E., Gallegati M., Palestrini A.. On the size distribution of firms: additional evidence from the G7 countries. Physica A, 2003, 324: 117-123.

[15] Gordon D. M.. The organization of work in social insect colonies. Nature, 1997, 380: 121-124.

[16] Gupta, H.M. & Campanha, J.R. (2002). Firms Growth Dynamics, Competition and Power Law Scaling. arXiv: condmat/0201219 v1

[17] Gustavasson, P. (2002). The dynamics of European industrial structure. FIEF Working Paper Series, 176, ISSN1651-0852.

[18] Hashemi F.. An evolutionary model of the size distribution of firms. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2000, 10: 507-521.

[19] Judson O.. The rise of the individual-based model in ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 1994, 9: 9-14.

[20] Kwasnicki W., Kwasnicka H.. Market, innovation, competition: an evolutionary model of industrial dynamics. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1992, 19: 343-368.

[21] Lomi A., Larsen E.R.. Dynamics of Organizations: Computational Modeling and Organizational Theories, 2001, New York: AAAI Press

[22] Peretto P.F.. A firm size, rivalry and the extent of the market in endogenous technological change. European Economic Review, 1999, 43: 1747-1773.

[23] Peretto P.F.. Cost reduction, entry, and the dynamics of market structure and economic growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 1999, 43: 173-195.

[24] Puu T.. Nonlinear Economic Dynamics, 1997, 3rd edition Berlin: Springer-Verlag

[25] Ramsden J.J., Kiss-Haypál G.. Company size distribution in different countries. Physica A, 2000, 277: 220-227.

[26] Reymondon, O. (1998). Market turbulence and the viability of the growth of firms: a simulation model, INTECH Euroconference, Industrial Structure, Innovation Dynamics and Technology Policy, Lisbon, 16–17.

[27] Stanley M.H.R., Buldyrev S.V., Falvlin S., et al. Zipf plots and the size ditribution of firms. Economic Letters, 1995, 49: 453-457.

[28] Wagener, F.O.O. (2003). Increasing returns, structural analysis of optimal investment for firms with non-concave production. Working Paper, http://www1.fee.uva.nl/cendef/publications/papers/preprint0308.pdf. Cited 10th Dec.

[29] Winter S.G., Kaniovski Y.M., Dosi G.. A baseline model of industry evolution. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2003, 13: 355-383.

[30] Zheng D., Rodgersa G.J., Hui P.M.. A model for the size distribution of groups and businesses. Physica A, 2002, 310: 480-486.