Ecological Validation and Practical Challenges of Conducting Dietary Analysis in Athletic Individuals Using a Novel Remote Food Photography Method Mobile Phone Application

Charlie J. Roberts, Nicholas D. Gill, Brett A. Baxter, Stacy T. Sims

Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise ›› 2023, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) : 90-96. DOI: 10.1007/s42978-022-00213-w
Original Article

Ecological Validation and Practical Challenges of Conducting Dietary Analysis in Athletic Individuals Using a Novel Remote Food Photography Method Mobile Phone Application

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Purpose

Dietary analysis is an important part of the sports nutrition practitioners’ role, however the ability to accurately collect and analyze dietary intake data is questionable. The remote food photography method (RFPM) has been proposed as a low-burden and potentially valid approach to collecting and interpreting dietary intake data. Preliminary research suggests that this is valid in some athletic populations, however the ecological validation in real-life settings warrants further investigation.

Methods

Twenty athletic individuals completed simultaneous three-day RFPM diaries and weighed food diaries for the analysis of energy, protein, carbohydrate, and fat. Participants were required to provide details alongside provided photographs that did not include food weights to allow for the estimation of nutrient intake from minimally invasive photographs and descriptions.

Results

RFPM demonstrated non-significant random and systematic error against the weighed food diary for energy, protein, carbohydrate, and fat at − 20.0 ± 455.5 kcal, − 2.9 ± 34.6 g, − 12.4 ± 49.3 g and 2.3 ± 26.8 g, respectively. Coefficient of variation suggest acceptable agreement between RFPM and weighed food diary for energy and poor agreement for protein, carbohydrate, and fat. Considerable variability is observed in the individual calculated values, with the least and greatest difference being 0% and − 83.0%, respectively.

Conclusion

The results indicate that the RFPM may be an ecologically valid tool for the collection and analysis of dietary intake data on a group level; on an individual basis, data and subsequent recommendations based on this method must be applied with caution.

Keywords

Dietary analysis / Remote food photography method / Practical validation / Practical challenges

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Charlie J. Roberts, Nicholas D. Gill, Brett A. Baxter, Stacy T. Sims. Ecological Validation and Practical Challenges of Conducting Dietary Analysis in Athletic Individuals Using a Novel Remote Food Photography Method Mobile Phone Application. Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise, 2023, 6(1): 90‒96 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42978-022-00213-w

References

[1.]
Baker LB, Heaton LE, Nuccio RP, Stein KW. Dietitian-observed macronutrient intakes of young skill and team-sport athletes: adequacy of pre, during, and postexercise nutrition. Int J Sport Nutr Exercise Metab., 2014, 24(2): 166-76,
CrossRef Google scholar
[2.]
Baker LB, Heaton LE, Stein KW, Nuccio RP, Jeukendrup AE. Validity and relative validity of a novel digital approach for 24-h dietary recall in athletes. Nutr J., 2014, 13(1): 41, pmcid: 4016617
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[3.]
Black AE. Dietary assessment for sports dietetics. Nutr. Bull., 2001,
CrossRef Google scholar
[4.]
Braakhuis AJ, Hopkins WG, Lowe TE, Rush EC. Development and validation of a food-frequency questionnaire to assess short-term antioxidant intake in athletes. Int J Sport Nutr Exercise Metab., 2011, 21(2): 105-112,
CrossRef Google scholar
[5.]
Braakhuis AJ, Meredith K, Cox GR, Hopkins WG, Burke LM. Variability in estimation of self-reported dietary intake data from elite athletes resulting from coding by different sports dietitians. Int J Sport Nutr Exercise Metab., 2003, 13(2): 152-165,
CrossRef Google scholar
[6.]
Capling L, Beck KL, Gifford JA, Slater G, Flood VM, O’Connor H. Validity of dietary assessment in athletes: a systematic review. Nutrients., 2017, 9(12): 1313, pmcid: 5748763
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[7.]
Costello N, Deighton K, Dyson J, Mckenna J, Jones B. Snap-N-Send: a valid and reliable method for assessing the energy intake of elite adolescent athletes. Eur J Sport Sci., 2017, 17(8): 1044-1055,
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[8.]
Desbrow B, Slater G, Cox GR. Sports nutrition for the recreational athlete. Austr J Gen Pract., 2020, 49(1–2): 17-22,
CrossRef Google scholar
[9.]
Jenner SL, Buckley GL, Belski R, Devlin BL, Forsyth AK. Dietary intakes of professional and semi-professional team sport athletes do not meet sport nutrition recommendations—a systematic literature review. Nutrients, 2019, 11(5): 1160, pmcid: 6567121
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[10.]
Ji Y, Plourde H, Bouzo V, Kilgour RD, Cohen TR. Validity and usability of a smartphone image-based dietary assessment app compared to 3-day food diaries in assessing dietary intake among Canadian adults: randomized controlled trial. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2020, pmcid: 7511869
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[11.]
Lombard MJ, Steyn NP, Charlton KE, Senekal M. Application and interpretation of multiple statistical tests to evaluate validity of dietary intake assessment methods. Nutr J., 2015, 14(1): 40, pmcid: 4471918
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[12.]
Martin CK, Correa JB, Han H, Allen HR, Rood JC, Champagne CM, Gunturk BK, Bray GA. Validity of the remote food photography method (RFPM) for estimating energy and nutrient intake in near real-time. Obesity, 2012, 20(4): 891-9,
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[13.]
Most J, Vallo PM, Altazan AD, Gilmore LA, Sutton EF, Cain LE, Burton JH, Martin CK, Redman LM. Food photography is not an accurate measure of energy intake in obese, pregnant women. J Nutr., 2018, 148(4): 658-63, pmcid: 6167554
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[14.]
Noll M, de Mendonça CR, de Souza Rosa LP, Silveira EA. Determinants of eating patterns and nutrient intake among adolescent athletes: a systematic review. Nutr J., 2017, 16(1): 46, pmcid: 5534032
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[15.]
O’Loughlin G, Cullen SJ, McGoldrick A, O’Connor S, Blain R, O’Malley S, Warrington GD. Using a wearable camera to increase the accuracy of dietary analysis. Am J Preventive Med., 2013, 44(3): 297-301,
CrossRef Google scholar
[16.]
Rollo ME, Ash S, Lyons-Wall P, Russell AW. Evaluation of a mobile phone image-based dietary assessment method in adults with type 2 diabetes. Nutrients, 2015, 7(6): 4897-910, pmcid: 4488822
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[17.]
Simpson A, Gemming L, Baker D, Braakhuis A. Do image-assisted mobile applications improve dietary habits, knowledge, and behaviours in elite athletes? A pilot study. Sports, 2017, 5(3): 60, pmcid: 5968953
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[18.]
Spriet LL. Performance nutrition for athletes. Sports Med, 2019, 49: 1-2, pmcid: 6445808
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[19.]
Stables RG, Kasper AM, Andy Sparks S, Morton JP, Close GL. An assessment of the validity of the remote food photography method (termed snap-N-send) in experienced and inexperienced sport nutritionists. Int J Sport Nutr Exercise Metab., 2021, 31(2): 125-134,
CrossRef Google scholar
[20.]
Thomas DT, Erdman KA, Burke LM. American College of Sports Medicine Joint position Statement. Nutrition and athletic performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc., 2016, 48(3): 543-68,
Pubmed
[21.]
Wardenaar FC, Steennis J, Ceelen IJM, Mensink M, Witkamp R, de Vries JHM. Validation of web-based, multiple 24-h recalls combined with nutritional supplement intake questionnaires against nitrogen excretions to determine protein intake in dutch elite athletes. Br J Nutr., 2015, 114(12): 2083-92,
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/