Supercavity Enhancement in High-Speed Heavyweight Torpedoes: Exploring the Role of Secondary Cavitator

Abstract

Underwater warfare in the modern world demands the development of fast, supercavitating torpedoes. Torpedoes typically achieve supercavitation via a single cavitator mounted at the nose; the cavitator’s dimensions dictate the supercavity size. This study introduces a novel approach of incorporating a secondary cavitator to enhance the supercavity and improve the performance of supercavitating torpedoes. Numerical simulations are performed using Reynolds-averaged Navier – Stokes equations solved with a pressure-based algorithm. The volume of fluid (VOF) multiphase model, in conjunction with the Schnerr–Sauer cavitation model, is employed to model the supercavitation phenomenon. The effects of cavitator size, positioning, and operating conditions on supercavity behavior are also examined. Results indicate that positioning the secondary cavitator at 70%–90% of the primary supercavity length significantly enlarges the supercavity, achieving a 30%–35% increase in supercavity length. The optimal size for the secondary cavitator is also identified, beyond which reverse flow and cavity shrinkage occur. The dependence of the secondary cavitator’s critical size on the primary cavitator’s diameter and Froude number is further investigated. This research provides new insights into the design of supercavitating vehicles and establishes a framework for optimizing cavitator configurations in heavyweight torpedoes.

Keywords

Supercavitation / High-speed torpedo / Multiphase flow / Cavitator / Cavity enlargement / Underwater vehicles

References

[1] Alyanak E, Grandhi R, Penmetsa R. Optimum design of a supercavitating torpedo considering overall size, shape, and structural configuration. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2006, 43(3): 642-657

[2] Cao L, Karn A, Arndt RE, Wang Z, Hong J. Numerical investigations of pressure distribution inside a ventilated supercavity. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2017, 139(2): 021301

[3] Chen G, Sun T, Yang ZHT. A study on the cavitating flow around an elliptical disk-shaped cavitator for non-body-ofrevolution underwater vehicles. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 2023, 17(1): 2159882

[4] Dular M, Griessler-Bulc T, Gutierrez-Aguirre I, Heath E, Kosjek T, Krivograd Klemenčič A, Oder M, Petkovšek M, Rački N, Ravnikar M, Šarc A, Širok B, Zupanc M, Žitnik M, Kompare B. Use of hydrodynamic cavitation in (waste) water treatment. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2016, 29: 577-588

[5] Gaurav K, Mittal G, Karn A. On the morphology of elongated bubbles during their formation at submerged orifices. Chemical Engineering Science, 2022, 250: 117395

[6] Gaurav K, Venkatesh N, Karn A. A comparative assessment of various cavitator shapes for high-speed supercavitating torpedoes: Geometry, flow-physics and drag considerations. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics, 2024, 17(9): 2028-2044

[7] Jeong SW, Pham VD, Ahn BK, Paik BG. Experimental and numerical study on flow dynamics and universal characteristics of ventilated supercavities behind different cavitators. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 2024, 16: 100582

[8] Karn A, Chawdhary S. On the synergistic interrelation between supercavity formation through vaporous and ventilated routes. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2018, 104: 1-8

[9] Karn A, Rosiejka B. Air entrainment characteristics of artificial supercavities for free and constrained closure models. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2017, 81: 364-369

[10] Kim MJ, Kim SH, Lee KC, Paik BG, Kim MC. Cavitator design for straight-running supercavitating torpedoes. Applied Sciences, 2021, 11(14): 6247

[11] Kim S, Lee J, Lee H, Lim J, Cho J. Effect of rotating, nonaxisymmetric cavitator on supercavity size. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2022, 36(7): 3437-3447

[12] Li D, Chen W, Shi Y, Luo K. Bow rudder of cavitator attached with a non-symmetric anti-roll fin for strong manoeuvring underwater supercavitating vehicles. Ships and Offshore Structures, 2022, 17(4): 840-851

[13] Likhachev DS, Li F, Kulagin VA. Experimental study on the performance of a rotational supercavitating evaporator for desalination. Science China Technological Sciences, 2014, 57(11): 2115-2130

[14] Liu B, Xiang M, Xie Z, Zhang W. On ventilated supercavities moving horizontally near free surface. Ocean Engineering, 2023, 267: 113229

[15] Logvinovich G, Serebryakov V. On methods of calculating form of slender axisymmetric cavities. J. Hydromechanics 32: 47-54 Myring DF (1976) Theoretical study of body drag in subcritical axisymmetric flow. Aeronautical Quarterly, 1975, 273: 186-194

[16] Nesteruk ISupercavitation: Advances and Perspectives A collection dedicated to the 70th jubilee of Yu. N. Savchenko, 2012SpringerBerlin

[17] Nguyen VT, Park WG. Numerical study of the thermodynamics and supercavitating flow around an underwater high-speed projectile using a fully compressible multiphase flow model. Ocean Engineering, 2022, 257: 111686

[18] Park SH, Nguyen VT, Park WG. Numerical investigation on supercavitation hydrodynamics of high-speed water entry projectiles under effect of different head shapes. Ocean Engineering, 2024, 311: 118926

[19] Rajkumar R, Gaurav K, Karn A, Kumar V, Shukla HNarendranth S, Mukunda PG, Saha UK. Numerical investigation of the effect of liquid temperature on supercavitation. Recent Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2023BerlinSpringer19-27

[20] Schmid A. New jet-aeration system using “Supercavitation”. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2010, 17(3): 582-585

[21] Schnerr GH, Sauer J. Physical and numerical modeling of unsteady cavitation dynamics. Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Multiphase Flow, New Orleans, USA Semenenko VN (2001) Artificial supercavitation. Physics and Calculation, 2001

[22] Shao S, Balakrishna A, Yoon K, Li J, Liu Y, Hong J. Effect of mounting strut and cavitator shape on the ventilation demand for ventilated supercavitation. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2020, 118: 110173

[23] Sun X, You W, Xuan X, Ji L, Xu X, Wang G, Zhao S, Boczkaj G, Yoon JY, Chen S. Effect of the cavitation generation unit structure on the performance of an advanced hydrodynamic cavitation reactor for process intensifications. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 412: 128600

[24] Waid RLCavity shapes for circular disks at angles of attack, 1957

[25] Xu C, Khoo BC. Dynamics of the supercavitating hydrofoil with cavitator in steady flow field. Physics of Fluids, 2020, 32(12): 123307

[26] Yi JJ, Kim MJ, Kim SH, Paik BG, Kim KC. Prediction of supercavitation shapes for a wide range of Froude numbers. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 2022, 14: 100426

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Harbin Engineering University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature