Conformations and Currents Make the Nerve Signal

Abstract

Conformation changes control the function of many proteins and thus much of biology. But it is not always clear what conformation means: is it the distribution of mass? Is it the distribution of permanent charge, like that on acid and base side chains? Is it the distribution of dielectric polarization? Here we point out that one of the most important conformation changes in biology can be directly measured and the meaning of conformation is explored in simulations and theory. The conformation change that underlies the main signal of the nervous system produces a displacement current— NOT an ionic current—that has been measured. Macroscopic measurements of atomic scale currents are possible because total current (including displacement current) is everywhere exactly the same in a one dimensional series system like a voltage clamped nerve membrane, as implied by the mathematical properties of the Maxwell Ampere law and the Kirchhoff law it implies. We use multiscale models to show how the change of a single side chain is enough to modulate dielectric polarization and change the speed of opening of voltage dependent channels. The idea of conformation change is thus made concrete by experimental measurements, theory, and simulations.

Keywords

Conformation / action potential / gating current / dielectric constant

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by the United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation (Grant No. 2016106 ).

References

[1] Koshland D E, Némethy G, Filmer D. Comparison of experimental binding data and theo-retical models in proteins containing subunits. Biochemistry, 1966, 5(1): 365-385.

[2] Monod J, Wyman J, Changeux J-P. On the nature of allosteric transitions: a plausible model. J. Mol. Biol., 1965, 12(1): 88-118.

[3] Bu Z, Callaway D J.Proteins move! Protein dynamics and long-range allostery in cell signaling. Adv. Protein Chem. Str., 2011, 83: 163-221.

[4] Catacuzzeno L, Franciolini F. The 70-year search for the voltage sensing mechanism of ion channels. J. Physiol., 2022, 600(14): 3227-3247.

[5] Hodgkin A L. Evidence for electrical transmission in nerve: Part I. J. Physiol., 1937, 90(2): 183-210.

[6] Hill A V.Chemical Wave Transmission in Nerve. Cambridge University Press, 1932.

[7] Lucas K. The ”all or none” contraction of the amphibian skeletal muscle fibre. J. Physiol., 1909, 38(2-3): 113-133.

[8] Adrian E. Nobel Lecture:The Activity of the Nerve Fibres ( 1932). Nobel Lectures: Physiol-ogy or Medicine, 1941.

[9] Huxley A.Kenneth Stewart Cole1900- 1984, a Biographical Memoir by Sir Andrew Huxley. Washington DC: National Academies Press, 1996.

[10] Huxley A. Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society, 2000.

[11] Huxley A. The Quantitative Analysis of Excitation and Conduction in Nerve. From Nobel Lectures,Physiology or Medicine1963- 1970, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1972.

[12] Neher E. Ion channels for communication between and within cells Nobel Lecture, Decem-ber 9, 1991.

[13] MacKinnon R. Nobel Lecture. Potassium channels and the atomic basis of selective ion conduction. Biosci. Rep., 2004, 24(2): 75-100.

[14] Hille B. What makes ion channels exciting-a penetrating interview with Bertil Hille. Phys-iology News, 2010, 81: 13-14.

[15] Katz B. Nerve, Muscle, and Synapse. New York, 1966.

[16] Stevens C F. Neurophysiology:a Primer. New York: John Wiley, 1966.

[17] Hille B. Ion Channels of Excitable Membranes. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates Inc., 2001.

[18] Huxley A F. Kenneth Stewart cole. Biographical Mem. Fellows. Roy. Soc., 1992, 38: 98-110.

[19] Huxley A F. From overshoot to voltage clamp. Trends Neurosci, 2002, 25 (11): 553-558.

[20] Mullins L J. A single channel or a dual channel mechanism for nerve excitation. J. Gen. Physiol., 1968, 52(3): 550-553.

[21] Mullins L J. Single or dual channel mechanisms. J. Gen. Physiol., 1968, 52(3): 555-556.

[22] Mullins L J. An analysis of conductance changes in squid axon. J. Gen. Physiol., 1959, 42(5): 1013-35.

[23] Mullins L J. An analysis of pore size in excitable membranes. J. Gen. Physiol., 1960, 43: 105-17.

[24] Liu J L, Eisenberg B. Molecular mean-field theory of ionic solutions: a Poisson-Nernst-Planck-Bikerman model. Entropy, 2020, 22: 550. Preprint available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.10300.

[25] Lim C, Dudev T. Potassium versus sodium selectivity in monovalent ion channel selectivity filters. Met. Ions Life Sci., 2016, 16: 325-47.

[26] Dudev T, Lim C. Ion selectivity strategies of sodium channel selectivity filters. Acc. Chem. Res., 2014, 47(12): 3580-7.

[27] Dudev T, Lim C. Why voltage-gated Ca2+ and bacterial Na+ channels with the same EEEE motif in their selectivity filters confer opposite metal selectivity. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2012, 14(36): 12451-6.

[28] Dudev T, Lim C. Factors governing the Na(+) vs K(+) selectivity in sodium ion channels. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132(7): 2321-32.

[29] Dudev T, Lim C. Determinants of K(+) vs Na(+) Selectivity in Potassium Channels. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131(23): 8092-8101.

[30] Boda D. Monte Carlo Simulation of electrolyte solutions in biology: in and out of equilib-rium. Annu. Rev. Compuat. Chem., 2014, 10: 127-164.

[31] Horng T L, Eisenberg R S, Liu C, et al. Continuum gating current models computed with consistent interactions. Biophys. J., 2019, 116(2): 270-282.

[32] Lacroix J J, Bezanilla F.Control of a final gating charge transition by a hydrophobic residue in the S 2 segment of a K+ channel voltage sensor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2011, 108(16): 6444-9.

[33] Lacroix J J, Bezanilla F. Tuning the voltage-sensor motion with a single residue. Biophys. J., 2012, 103(3): L23-5.

[34] Catacuzzeno L, Franciolini F. Simulation of gating currents of the shaker K channel using a Brownian model of the voltage sensor. Biophys. J., 2019, 117(10): 2005-2019.

[35] Bezanilla F. Gating currents. J. Gen. Physiol., 2018, 150(7): 911-932.

[36] Bezanilla F. How membrane proteins sense voltage. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol., 2008, 9(4): 323-32.

[37] Bezanilla F. Ion channels: from conductance to structure. Neuron, 2008, 60(3): 456-68.

[38] Eisenberg R S. Kirchhoff’s Law can be Exact. ArXiv preprint available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.13574, 2019.

[39] Eisenberg B, Oriols X, Ferry D.Dynamics of current, charge, and mass. Mol. Based Math. Biol., 2017, 5: 78-115.

[40] Eisenberg R S. Updating Maxwell with electrons, charge, and more realistic Polarization. ArXiv preprint available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.09695, 2019.

[41] Hodgkin A L, Rushton W A H.The electrical constants of a crustacean nerve fiber. Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) Ser. B, 1946, 133: 444-479.

[42] Davis L D, No R L. Contribution to the Mathematical Theory of the electrotonus. Stud. Rockefeller Inst. Med. Res., 1947, 131: 442-496.

[43] Ghausi M S, Kelly J J. Introduction to Distributed-Parameter Networks. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston, 1968.

[44] Catacuzzeno L, Sforna L, Franciolini F. Why are voltage gated Na channels faster than K channels: a multi-scale hierarchical model. BioRxiv, 2020: 2020.05.11.088559.

[45] Labro A J, Priest M F, Lacroix J J, et al. Kv 3.1 uses a timely resurgent K(+) current to secure action potential repolarization. Nat. Commun., 2015, 6: 10173.

[46] Lacroix J J, Campos F V, Frezza L, et al. Molecular bases for the Asynchronous activation of sodium and Potassium channels required for nerve impulse generation. Neuron, 2013, 79(4): 651-657.

[47] Lacroix J J, Hyde H C, Campos F V.Moving gating charges through the gating pore in a Kv channel voltage sensor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2014, 111(19): E 1950-9.

[48] Peyser A, Neely A, Larsson P, et al. Voltage sensor of ion channels and enzymes. Biophys. Rev., 2012, 4(1): 1-15.

[49] Ahern C A. The secret lives of voltage sensors. J. Physiol., 2007, 583(3): 813-4.

[50] Bezanilla F. Voltage sensor movements. J. Gen. Physiol., 2002, 120(4): 465-473.

[51] Bezanilla F. The voltage sensor in voltage-dependent ion channels. Physiol. Rev., 2000, 80(2): 555-92.

[52] Crotty P, Sangrey T, Levy W B. Metabolic energy cost of action potential velocity. J. Neuro-physiol., 2006, 96(3): 1237-1246.

[53] Hasenstaub A, Otte S, Callaway E, et al. Metabolic cost as a unifying principle governing neuronal biophysics. P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 2010, 107(27): 12329-12334.

[54] Alle H, Roth A, Geiger J R P. Energy-efficient action potentials in Hippocampal mossy fibers. Science, 2009, 325(5946): 1405-1408.

[55] DeCoursey T E. Voltage-gated Proton channels: molecular biology, physiology, and patho-physiology of the HV family. Physiol. Rev., 2013, 93(2): 599-652.

[56] DeCoursey T E. The Voltage-gated Proton Channel: a Aiddle, Wrapped in a Mystery, Inside an Enigma. Biochemistry, 2015.

[57] Dudev T, Musset B, Morgan D, et al. Selectivity mechanism of the voltage-gated Proton channel. HV1. Sci. Rep., 2015, 5: 10320.

[58] Feynman R P, Leighton R B, Sands M. The Feynman:Lectures on Physics, Mainly Electro-magnetism and Matter, New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1963.

[59] Eisenberg R S. Computing the field in proteins and channels. J. Membrane Biol., 1996, 150: 1-25.

[60] Eisenberg R S. Atomic Biology,Electrostatics and Ionic Channels. In New Developments and Theoretical Studies of Proteins, R. Elber, Editor, World Scientific: Philadelphia, 1996.

[61] Eisenberg B, Hyon Y, Liu C. Energy variational analysis EnVarA of ions in water and chan-nels: field theory for primitive models of complex ionic fluids. J. Chem. Phys., 2010, 133(10): 104104.

[62] Hodgkin A L, Huxley A F, Katz B. Measurement of current-voltage relations in the mem-brane of the giant axon of Loligo. J. Physiol. (London), 1952, 116: 424-448.

[63] Armstrong C M, Bezanilla F. Charge movement associated with the opening and closing of the activation gates of the Na channel. J. Gen. Physiol., 1974, 63: 533-552.

[64] Hong K H, Armstrong C M, Miller C. Revisiting the role of Ca2+ in Shaker K+ channel gating. Biophys. J., 2001, 80(5): 2216-20.

[65] Ahern C A. What activates inactivation? J. Gen. Physiol., 2013.

[66] Ulbricht W. Sodium channel inactivation: molecular determinants and modulation. Phys-iol. Rev., 2005, 85(4): 1271-1301.

[67] Aldrich R W. Fifty years of inactivation. Nature, 2001, 411(6838): 643-4.

[68] Kremer F, Schonhals A.Broadband Dielectric Spectroscopy. Springer, 2003.

[69] Barsoukov E, Macdonald J R.Impedance Spectroscopy: Theory, Experiment, and Applica-tions. John Wiley & Sons, 2018.

[70] Ciucci F. Modeling Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy. Current Opinion in Electro-chemistry, 2018.

[71] Taylor R E, Bezanilla F. Comments on the measurement of gating currents in the frequency domain. Biophys. J., 1979, 26(2): 338-40.

[72] Bezanilla F, Taylor R E, Fernandez J M. Distribution and kinetics of membrane dielectric polarization, 1, Long-term inactivation of gating currents. J. Gen. Physiol., 1982, 79(1): 21-40.

[73] Fernandez J, Bezanilla F, Taylor R. Distribution and kinetics of membrane dielectric polar-ization, II, Frequency domain studies of gating currents. J. Gen. Physiol., 1982, 79(1): 41-67.

[74] Eisenberg R S. Thermostatics vs. Electrodynamics. DOI: 10.20944/preprints202009.0349.v1, Available at https://bit.ly/3j3CaRX, 2020.

[75] Eisenberg B. Setting Boundaries for Statistical Mechanics. ArXiv preprint arXiv:2112. 12550, 2021.

[76] Wang Y, Liu C, Eisenberg B. On variational principles for polarization in electromechanical systems. ArXiv preprint arXiv:2108. 11512, 2021.

[77] Eisenberg R S. Core Maxwell Equations are Exact, Universal, and Scary. Slide Show: DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.24122.31687, 2021.

[78] Eisenberg R S. Maxwell Equations for Material Systems. Doi: 10.20944/preprints 202011.0201.v1, 2020.

[79] Eisenberg R.A Necessary Addition to Kirchhoff’s Current Law of Circuits Version 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31224/2234, 2022.

[80] Taylor R E, Moore J W, Cole K S. Analysis of certain errors in squid axon voltage clamp measurements. Biophys. J., 1960, 1: 161-202.

[81] Eisenberg B. Asking biological questions of physical systems: The device approach to emergent properties. J. Mol. Liq., 2018, 270: 212-217. Preprint available on arXiv as https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.05452.

[82] Schneider M F, Chandler W K. Voltage dependent charge movement in skeletal muscle: a possible step in excitation-contraction coupling. Nature, 1973, 242(5395): 244-246.

[83] Armstrong C M, Bezanilla F. Charge movement associated with the opening and closing of the activation gates of the Na channels. J. Gen. Physiol., 1974, 63(5): 533-52.

[84] Hodgkin A L, Huxley A F. A quantitative description of membrane current and its appli-cation to conduction and excitation in nerve. J. Physiol., 1952, 117: 500-544.

[85] Mesirov J P, Schulten K, Sumners D W. Mathematical Approaches to Biomolecular Struc-ture and Dynamics. New York: Springer, 1996.

[86] Purcell E M. Life at low Reynolds number. Amer. J. Phys., 1977, 45: 3-11.

[87] Berg H C. Random Walks in Biology. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983.

[88] Catacuzzeno L, Franciolini F. Simulation of gating currents of the Shaker K channel using a Brownian model of the voltage sensor. ArXiv preprint arXiv:1809.05464, 2018.

[89] Horng T-L, Eisenberg R S, Bezanilla F. Gating current models computed with consistent interactions. Biophys. J., 2016, 110(3): 102a-103a.

[90] Henrion U, Renhorn J, Borjesson S, et al.Tracking a complete voltage-sensor cycle with metal-ion bridges. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2012, 109(22): 8552-7.

[91] Xu D, Phillips J C, Schulten K. Protein response to external electric fields: relaxation, hys-teresis, and echo. J. Phys. Chem., 1996, 100(29): 12108-12121.

[92] Kolafa J, Viererblova´ L. Static dielectric constant from simulations revisited: fluctuations or external field? J. Chem. Theory Comput., 2014, 10(4): 1468-1476.

[93] Sansom M S, Smith G R, Adcock C, et al. The dielectric properties of water within model transbilayer pores. Biophys. J., 1997, 73(5): 2404-15.

[94] Voges D, Karshikoff A. A model of a local dielectric constant in proteins. J. Chem. Phys., 1998, 108(5): 2219-2227.

[95] Song X. An inhomogeneous model of protein dielectric properties: Intrinsic polarizabilities of amino acids. J. Chem. Phys., 2002, 116(21): 9359-9363.

[96] Nadler B, Hollerbach U, Eisenberg R S. Dielectric boundary force and its crucial role in gramicidin. Phys. Rev. E. Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys., 2003, 68(2): 021905.

[97] Chanda B, Asamoah O K, Bezanilla F. Coupling interactions between voltage sensors of the sodium channel as revealed by site-specific measurements. J. Gen. Physiol., 2004. 123(3): 217-230.

[98] Eisenberg R S. Electrodynamics Correlates Knock-on and Knock-off: Current is Spatially Uniform in Ion Channels. Preprint on arXiv at https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.09012.

[99] Hodgkin A L. Evidence for electrical transmission in nerve: Part II. J. Physiol., 1937, 90(2): 211-232.

[100] Hodgkin A L. The relation between conduction velocity and the electrical resistance out-side a nerve fibre. J. Physiol., 1939, 94(4): 560-570.

[101] Jack J J B, Noble D, Tsien R W. Electric Current Flow in Excitable Cells. New York: Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1975.