Longitudinal response of shield tunnels under crossing and asymmetric loading: An improved model considering coupled axial-bending-shear interactions

Shifan Qiao , Weigeng Chen , Fei Meng , Daolong Chen

Journal of Central South University ›› : 1 -26.

PDF
Journal of Central South University ›› :1 -26. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-026-6388-x
Research Article
research-article
Longitudinal response of shield tunnels under crossing and asymmetric loading: An improved model considering coupled axial-bending-shear interactions
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Shield tunnels are inherently discontinuous structures, whereas conventional longitudinal beam models generally idealize them as continuous systems and therefore cannot adequately capture the mechanical interactions at segment joints. To address this limitation, this paper proposes an improved longitudinal Timoshenko short beam spring model, LTSBSM, for shield tunnels. In the proposed model, each segment ring is represented by a Timoshenko short beam to account for shear deformation within the ring, while rotational, tensile, compressive, and shear springs are introduced at the inter-ring joints to characterize the coupled tension, compression, bending, and shear behavior, as well as the associated deformation discontinuities. Based on this framework, governing equations are established for overcrossing, undercrossing, and asymmetric thrust conditions, and a 10-point hybrid finite difference template is developed for the discontinuous tunnel joint system. The proposed model is then validated using three representative engineering cases. In the case studies, the joint-related parameters are first calibrated using a reference foundation elastic coefficient expression, and alternative empirical expressions are then compared on the same basis. The results show that the proposed model can capture both global tunnel deformation and local joint opening and dislocation under different loading conditions, while preserving the discontinuous longitudinal response of segmental shield tunnels. Different foundation elastic coefficient expressions generally produce similar spatial response patterns but noticeable differences in peak magnitude and influence range. Within the investigated range, increasing the soil elastic modulus Es, from 15 MPa to 60 MPa, reduces the peak tunnel heave from approximately 4.29 mm to 0.98 mm, whereas the scaling coefficients for joint rotational and shear stiffnesses mainly regulate the distribution of local joint opening and dislocation through rotational and shear restraint.

Keywords

modified longitudinal beam-spring model / segment joint / overcrossing tunneling / undercrossing tunneling / asymmetric thrust

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Shifan Qiao, Weigeng Chen, Fei Meng, Daolong Chen. Longitudinal response of shield tunnels under crossing and asymmetric loading: An improved model considering coupled axial-bending-shear interactions. Journal of Central South University 1-26 DOI:10.1007/s11771-026-6388-x

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Dammyr Ø. Pressurized TBM-shield tunneling under the subsidence sensitive grounds of Oslo: Possibilities and limitations [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2017, 66: 47-55

[2]

Lo K Y, Ramsay J A. The effect of construction on existing subway tunnels: A case study from Toronto [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 1991, 6(3): 287-297

[3]

Franza A, Marshall A M, Haji T, et al.. A simplified elastic analysis of tunnel-piled structure interaction [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2017, 61: 104-121

[4]

Broere W. Urban underground space: Solving the problems of today’s cities [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 55: 245-248

[5]

Cavalaro S H P, Blom C B M, Walraven J C, et al.. Structural analysis of contact deficiencies in segmented lining [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2011, 26(6): 734-749

[6]

Qiao S-f, Li H-y, Ng S T, et al.. XGBoost-based global sensitivity analysis of ground settlement caused by shield tunneling in dense karst areas [J]. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2024, 62: 102928

[7]

Franza A, Acikgoz S, DeJong M J. Timoshenko beam models for the coupled analysis of building response to tunnelling [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 96: 103160

[8]

Talmon A M, Bezuijen A. Calculation of longitudinal bending moment and shear force for Shanghai Yangtze River Tunnel: Application of lessons from Dutch research [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2013, 35: 161-171

[9]

Shi C-h, Wang Z-x, Gong C-j, et al.. Prediction of the additional structural response of segmental tunnel linings induced by asymmetric jack thrusts [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2022, 124: 104471

[10]

Gil Lorenzo S. In situ behaviour of an instrumented ring subjected to active eccentric tail seal passage [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2023, 131: 104812

[11]

Ali Soomro M, Liu K, Cui Z-d, et al.. Insights from 3D numerical simulations on the impact of tunnelling on vertical and battered pile groups under lateral loading [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2024, 169: 106195

[12]

Ali Soomro M, Hong Y, Ng C W W, et al.. Load transfer mechanism in pile group due to single tunnel advancement in stiff clay [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2015, 45: 63-72

[13]

Phutthananon C, Lertkultanon S, Jongpradist P, et al.. Numerical investigation on the responses of existing single piles due to adjacent twin tunneling considering the lagging distance [J]. Underground Space, 2023, 11: 171-188

[14]

Liu W-z, Wang M-y, Luo G-j, et al.. Horizontal response of existing pile induced by adjacent shield tunnelling with large longitudinal slope [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2024, 153: 106036

[15]

Wang R, Yan B, Wang Y, et al.. Prediction of adjacent single pile deformation induced by tunnel excavation based on the Pasternak model [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2024, 152: 105932

[16]

Zhang K, Zhou Z-l, Wan Z-y, et al.. Coupling analytical investigation on the response of an existing tunnel subjected to underpassing shield tunneling [J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2026, 50(5): 2225-2240

[17]

Liu J-w, Shi C-h, Lei M-f, et al.. Improved analytical method for evaluating the responses of a shield tunnel to adjacent excavations and its application [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 98: 103339

[18]

Xu L-h, Tao Z-y, He C, et al.. A novel analytical framework for the tunnel-soil coupled model with improved numerical stability and computational efficiency [J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2027, 161: 117143

[19]

Feng G-h, Ding Z, Xu C-j, et al.. Analytical solution to estimate the effect of underlying tunnel excavations on the existing tunnel [J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2024, 48(17): 4221-4231

[20]

Ali Soomro M, Kumar M, Xiong H, et al.. Investigation of effects of different construction sequences on settlement and load transfer mechanism of single pile due to twin stacked tunnelling [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 96: 103171

[21]

Meguid M A, Saada O, Nunes M A, et al.. Physical modeling of tunnels in soft ground: A review [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2008, 23(2): 185-198

[22]

Franza A, Marshall A M. Centrifuge modeling study of the response of piled structures to tunneling [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2018, 144(2): 04017109

[23]

Wei Z. Simplified method for evaluating mechanical interactions between tunnel and soil due to adjacent excavation [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2023, 139: 105205

[24]

Wang Z-x, Shi C-h, Gong C-j, et al.. Difference solutions for responses of foundation-beams with arbitrary boundary conditions considering spatial soil variability and its applications [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2022, 151: 105002

[25]

Liu X, Fang Q, Jiang A-n, et al.. Deformation analysis of existing tunnels with shearing and bending stiffness reduction at movement joints [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2022, 123: 104408

[26]

Bernat S, Cambou B. Soil-structure interaction in shield tunnelling in soft soil [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 1998, 22(3–4): 221-242

[27]

Xu Y-j, Zhang Z-x, Zhang C, et al.. Analysis of longitudinal deformation of existing rectangular pipe jacking tunnel caused by shield tunnel undercrossing [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2025, 161: 106532

[28]

Yang S-q, Wu H-n, Cheng H-z, et al.. A full-ring mechanical model of shield tunnels considering detailed joint configurations [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2025, 164: 106808

[29]

Fu Y-b, Liang N, Guo Y-h, et al.. Calculation method and application of discontinuous longitudinal deformation of shield tunnels considering variable stiffness of the ring joints [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2025, 161: 106592

[30]

Gong W-p, Juang C H, Huang H-w, et al.. Improved analytical model for circumferential behavior of jointed shield tunnels considering the longitudinal differential settlement [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2015, 45: 153-165

[31]

Feng D-l, Wu H-n, Chen R-p, et al.. An analytical model of longitudinal joints in the segmental lining of shield tunnels with considering geometric nonlinearity [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2024, 152: 105963

[32]

Wang F, Shi J-k, Huang H-w, et al.. Modified analytical solution of shield tunnel lining considering nonlinear bending stiffness of longitudinal joint [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 106: 103625

[33]

Shiba Y, Kawashima K, Kano N, et al.. An evaluation method of longitudinal stiffness of shield tunnel linings for application to seismic response analyses [J]. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, 1988, 398: 319-327

[34]

Cheng H-z, Chen R-p, Wu H-n, et al.. General solutions for the longitudinal deformation of shield tunnels with multiple discontinuities in strata [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2021, 107: 103652

[35]

Wu H-n, Shen S-l, Yang J, et al.. Soil-tunnel interaction modelling for shield tunnels considering shearing dislocation in longitudinal joints [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 78: 168-177

[36]

Liang R-zhu. Simplified analytical method for evaluating the effects of overcrossing tunnelling on existing shield tunnels using the nonlinear Pasternak foundation model [J]. Soils and Foundations, 2019, 59(6): 1711-1727

[37]

Meng F, Qiao S-fan. Study on the deformation of existing tunnel under the combined effect of pit excavation and dewatering based on the Kerr foundation model [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2025, 158: 106382

[38]

Liao S-m, Peng F-l, Shen S-long. Analysis of shearing effect on tunnel induced by load transfer along longitudinal direction [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2008, 23(4): 421-430

[39]

Zhang Z-w, Liang R-z, Li Z-c, et al.. Analytical solution for longitudinal deformation of shield tunnel induced by overcrossing tunnelling considering circumferential joints [J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 15(9): 2355-2374

[40]

Arnau O, Molins C. Three dimensional structural response of segmental tunnel linings [J]. Engineering Structures, 2012, 44: 210-221

[41]

Flugge W. Stresses in Shells [M], 1960, Berlin, Springer

[42]

Seide P. Small elastic deformations of thin shells [M], 1975, Dordrecht, Springer Netherlands

[43]

Liu J-g, Zhang X-h, Jin Y-y, et al.. A modified shell-joint model for segmental tunnel dislocations under differential settlement [J]. Geomechanics and Engineering, 2023, 35(4): 411-424

[44]

Koizumi J, Murakami H, Saino K. Modelling of longitudinal structure of shield tunnel [J]. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, 1988: 79–88.

[45]

Chen Z P, Zang Y W, Yang Z X, et al.. Analytical solution for longitudinal dynamic response of shield tunnel linings using the state-space method [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2024, 169: 106104

[46]

Tian C, Huang L-c, Liang Y. Longitudinal deformation mechanism of shield tunnels caused by erosion voids in the underlying soil [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2025, 157: 106339

[47]

Koyama Y. Present status and technology of shield tunneling method in Japan [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2003, 18(2–3): 145-159

[48]

Huang W M, Wang J C, Yang Z X, et al.. Analytical analysis of the longitudinal response of shield tunnel lining considering ring-to-ring interaction [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2022, 146: 104705

[49]

Zhang Z-w, Zheng G, Cheng X-s, et al.. Analytical approach for longitudinal deformation of shield tunnels considering bending-shear-torsional effects of circumferential joints [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2024, 152: 105946

[50]

Liang R-z, Zhang Z-w, Li Z-c, et al.. Simplified method for predicting the shield tunnel longitudinal responses to over-crossing tunneling considering circumferential joint effect [J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2024, 24(7): 04024140

[51]

Zhang Z-w, Liang R-z, Li Z-c, et al.. Analysis of longitudinal deformation of shield tunnel subjected to shield tail asymmetric thrust [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(1): 88-98(in Chinese)

[52]

Liu B, Yu Z-w, Han Y-h, et al.. Analytical solution for the response of an existing tunnel induced by above-crossing shield tunneling [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2020, 124: 103624

[53]

Liu B, Yu Z-w, Zhang R-h, et al.. Effects of undercrossing tunneling on existing shield tunnels [J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2021, 21(8): 04021131

[54]

Liang R-z, Xia T-d, Huang M-s, et al.. Simplified analytical method for evaluating the effects of adjacent excavation on shield tunnel considering the shearing effect [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2017, 81: 167-187

[55]

Zhang Z-g, Huang M-s, Xu C, et al.. Simplified solution for tunnel-soil-pile interaction in Pasternak’s foundation model [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 78: 146-158

[56]

Cheng K, Xu R-q, Ying H-w, et al.. Analytical method for predicting tunnel heave due to overlying excavation considering spatial effect [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2023, 138: 105169

[57]

Wu Y-h, Xiao C-j, Chen F-q, et al.. Study on mechanical characteristics of pipe umbrella support in shallow buried tunnels [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2024, 145: 105578

[58]

Vesić A B. Bending of beams resting on isotropic elastic solid [J]. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 1961, 87(2): 35-53

[59]

Attewell P B, Yeates J, Selby A R. Soil Movements Induced by Tunnelling and Their Effects on Pipelines and Structures [M], 1986, London, Blackie and Son Ltd

[60]

Yu J, Zhang C-r, Huang M-song. Soil–pipe interaction due to tunnelling: Assessment of Winkler modulus for underground pipelines [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2013, 50: 17-28

[61]

Xia G-y, Li C-xi. Frame Structure Theory and Its Applications with Shear Deformation Effect [M], 2008, Beijing, China Communications Press(in Chinese)

[62]

Wu B, Liu W, Shi P-x, et al.. A case study of newly tunnels over-crossing the existing subway tunnels [J]. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 2022, 18(3): 155013292210871

[63]

Liang R-z, Xia T-d, Hong Y, et al.. Effects of above-crossing tunnelling on the existing shield tunnels [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 58: 159-176

[64]

Liang R-z, Kang C, Xiang L-m, et al.. Responses of in-service shield tunnel to overcrossing tunnelling in soft ground [J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2021, 80(5): 183

[65]

Dai X-ya. Research on the influence and control of shield up-passing construction on the deformation of existing subway tunnel [D], 2022, Changsha, Central South University(in Chinese)

[66]

Zhang Z-g, Huang M-song. Geotechnical influence on existing subway tunnels induced by multiline tunneling in Shanghai soft soil [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2014, 56: 121-132

[67]

Liang R-zhu. Research on the environmental effects of soft ground shield-driven tunnel and its response to adjacent excavation [D], 2018, Hangzhou, Zhejiang University(in Chinese)

[68]

Wang Z-x, Shi C-h, Liu J-wen. Analytical solution of additional response of shield tunnel under asymmetric jack thrust [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(9): 2449-2460(in Chinese)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Central South University

PDF

2

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/