Dynamic response of train in wind-train-bridge coupling based on bridges with different structural systems

Xu-hui He , Qing Ma , Yun-feng Zou , Dian-yi Guo , Xiang-rong Guo , Su-ping Gao

Journal of Central South University ›› 2025, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (12) : 5037 -5060.

PDF
Journal of Central South University ›› 2025, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (12) :5037 -5060. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-025-6140-y
Research Article
research-article

Dynamic response of train in wind-train-bridge coupling based on bridges with different structural systems

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Most studies have analyzed the aerodynamic characteristics and wind-train(vehicle)-bridge coupled vibration response of trains or vehicles on bridges of a certain structural system, while few comparative studies have been carried out on the wind-train-bridge coupled vibration response on bridges of three different structural systems. This paper takes the main span 1120 m dual-purpose highway-railway bridge as the engineering background, and studies the three bridge types of (122+1120+90+92) m suspension bridge, (130+432+1120+432+130) m cable-stayed bridge and (92+210+1120+210+92) m cable-stayed-suspension collaborative system bridge. The trend of the maximum value of the train dynamic response to the wind-train-bridge coupling of the three structural system bridges as well as the speed thresholds are compared and analyzed, and conclusions are drawn: 1) Under the same speed, the maximum value of train safety indexes in three types of bridges increases with the increase of wind speed. 2) Under the same wind speed, the safety and smoothness indicators of trains in three types of bridges without wind barriers rank in the order of cable-stayed-suspension collaborative system bridge>cable-stayed bridge>suspension bridge. 3) At low wind speeds (≤15 m/s), a 3.0 m wind barrier has negligible effect on speed thresholds. The safety ranking of structural systems remains unchanged: cable-stayed-suspension collaborative system bridge>cable-stayed bridge>suspension bridge. 4) At high wind speeds (≥20 m/s), the 3.0 m wind barrier can increase the train speed threshold for bridges within the same structural system. The safety ranking of the three bridge types (3.0 m 30% wind barrier) remains unchanged: cable-stayed-suspension collaborative system bridge>cable-stayed bridge>suspension bridge. This study represents the first systematic comparative analysis of wind speed critical values and performance ratings across three distinct bridge structural systems.

Keywords

train / suspension bridge / cable-stayed bridge / cable-stayed-suspension collaborative system bridge / aerodynamic coefficient / wind-train-bridge system / speed thresholds of train

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xu-hui He, Qing Ma, Yun-feng Zou, Dian-yi Guo, Xiang-rong Guo, Su-ping Gao. Dynamic response of train in wind-train-bridge coupling based on bridges with different structural systems. Journal of Central South University, 2025, 32(12): 5037-5060 DOI:10.1007/s11771-025-6140-y

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

He X-h, Wu Y-g, Peng G-set al.. Recent developments in the wind resistance of railway bridges in China [J]. Advances in Wind Engineering, 2024, 1(2): 100027

[2]

He X-h, Li H, Hu Let al.. Crosswind aerodynamic characteristics of a stationary interior railway carriage through a long-span truss-girder bridge [J]. Engineering Structures, 2020, 210: 110350

[3]

Hong S W, Lee I B, Seo I H. Modelling and predicting wind velocity patterns for windbreak fence design [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2015, 142: 53-64

[4]

Zhang J-y, Zhang M-j, Li Y-let al.. Local wind characteristics on bridge deck of twin-box girder considering wind barriers by large-scale wind tunnel tests [J]. Natural Hazards, 2020, 103(1): 751-766

[5]

He X-h, Li H. Review of aerodynamics of high-speed train-bridge system in crosswinds [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2020, 27(4): 1054-1073

[6]

Zou Y-f, Yang C-g, He X-het al.. Spacing effect on aerodynamic characteristics for a rail-cum-road bridge with twin asymmetrical parallel girders [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2024, 36(8): 083611

[7]

Wang B, Wang W-x, Li Y-let al.. Aerodynamic characteristics study of vehicle-bridge system based on computational fluid dynamics [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2023, 234: 105351

[8]

Zhang Q, Cai X-p, Wang Tet al.. Aerodynamic performance and dynamic response of high-speed trains passing by each other on cable-stayed bridge under crosswind [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2024, 247: 105701

[9]

Zou S-m, He X-h, Wang H-f. Numerical investigation on the crosswind effects on a train running on a bridge [J]. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 2020, 1411458-1471

[10]

Zou Y-f, Liang H-b, Cai C-zet al.. Effects of combined-type wind barriers on the running safety of trains on bridges [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2025, 267: 106236

[11]

He X-h, Ma Q, Zou Y-fet al.. Wind tunnel test on aerodynamic characteristics of vehicles in double-deck highway-railway steel truss bridge under crosswind conditions [J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2024, 37(8): 32-42(in Chinese)

[12]

Yan L, Li J-l, He X-het al.. Ride comfort assessment of road vehicles on a long-span truss girder suspension bridge under crosswinds [J]. Engineering Structures, 2025, 322: 119112

[13]

Guo X-r, Xiao Y-f. Influence of aerodynamic interference of parallel adjacent bridges on coupled vibration of train-bridge system [J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2023, 20(10): 3831-3840(in Chinese)

[14]

Montenegro P A, Calçada R, Carvalho Het al.. Stability of a train running over the Volga river high-speed railway bridge during crosswinds [J]. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2020, 16(8): 1121-1137

[15]

Yang Y-x, Zhang J-j, Cao F-cet al.. Evaluation and improvement of wind environment and vehicle safety on long-span bridge deck under strong crosswind [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2022, 228: 105089

[16]

He J-j, Xiang H-y, Li Y-let al.. Aerodynamic performance of traveling road vehicles on a single-level rail-cum-road bridge under crosswind and aerodynamic impact of traveling trains [J]. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 2022, 16(1): 335-358

[17]

Dai Y-q, Dai X-w, Bai Yet al.. Aerodynamic performance of an adaptive GFRP wind barrier structure for railway bridges [J]. Materials, 2020, 13(18): 4214

[18]

Zou Y-f, Xue F-r, Shi Ket al.. Analysis of the effects of wind barrier on driving safety and comfort of vehicles on long-span bridges under crosswinds [J]. Structures, 2022, 42: 367-385

[19]

Xue F-r, Han Y, Zou Y-fet al.. Effects of wind-barrier parameters on dynamic responses of wind-road vehicle–bridge system [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2020, 206: 104367

[20]

Liu L-l, Zou Y-f, He X-het al.. Effects of wind barriers on the aerodynamic characteristics of bridge-train system for a road-rail same-story truss bridge [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2022, 29(8): 2690-2705

[21]

General specifications for design of highway bridges and culverts: JTG D60-2015 [S]. (in Chinese)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Central South University

PDF

3

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/