Effect of train heights on aerodynamic performance of high-speed trains under crosswind

Abstract

The influence of train height on aerodynamic characteristics of high-speed train (HST) is significant in crosswind environments. This study employed the improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) turbulence model to analyze the aerodynamic characteristics of trains with three different heights under a crosswind of 20 m/s. The numerical model was validated through comparison with wind tunnel experimental data. A comprehensive analysis was conducted on the characteristics of the flow field around trains, surface pressure distribution, and aerodynamic loads for trains with different heights. Results indicate that the side force coefficient increased by up to 61.54% with an increase in train height from 3.89 to 4.19 m. Compared with the 3.89 m case, the roll moment coefficient on the head, middle, and tail cars for 4.19 m cases increased by 18.11%, 24.78% and 34.23%, respectively. The increase in train height widens the impact width of the leading car’ s front vortex on the leeward side and intensifies the helical shedding and coupling interactions of two vortices in the wake, leading to an increase in the intensity and extent of wake flow in both vertical and longitudinal directions. Additionally, the increase in height shifted the flow separation point on the leeward side, moving vortices farther from the train, expanding the back-flow region, and intensifying Reynolds stress and turbulent fluctuations on the leeward side, which adversely impacted train stability and safety. The research findings can provide a reference for the design of train configurations and the assessment of dynamic performance in crosswind environments.

Keywords

train height / crosswind / high-speed train / aerodynamic loads / flow topology

References

[1] Zhang J, Adamu A, Su X-cet al.. Effect of simplifying bogie regions on aerodynamic performance of high-speed train [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2022, 29(5): 1717-1734

[2] Haddad A, Mohebbi M. Railway transport and engineering: A comprehensive guide [M], 2025

[3] Yang G-h, Yang A-l, Wei Q-let al.. Application experiences and the enlightenment of doubledeck EMUs [J]. China Transportation Review, 2018, 40(8): 122-126 in Chinese)

[4] Aschwanden P, Müller J, Travaglio G Cet al.. The influence of motion aerodynamics on the simulation of vehicle dynamics [J]. SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars-Mechanical Systems, 2008, 1(1): 545-551

[5] Wang K-w, Xiong X-h, Wen Cet al.. Impact of the train heights on the aerodynamic behaviour of a highspeed train [J]. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 2023, 17: 2233614

[6] Xue R-d, Xiong X-h, Chen G. Flow dynamics of train under turbulent inflow at different crosswind yaw angles [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2024, 36(3): 035176

[7] Liu D-y, Wang C, Gonzalez-Libreros Jet al.. Modified calculation model of train-induced aerodynamic pressure on vertical noise barriers considering the train geometry effect [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2024, 249: 105750

[8] Baker C J. Ground vehicles in high cross winds part I: Steady aerodynamic forces [J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 1991, 5169-90

[9] Baker C J. The behaviour of road vehicles in unsteady cross winds [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1993, 49(1–3): 439-448

[10] Niu J-q, Zhou D, Liang X-f. Numerical investigation of the aerodynamic characteristics of highspeed trains of different lengths under crosswind with or without windbreaks [J]. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 2018, 12(1): 195-215

[11] Huo X-s, Liu T-h, Chen Z-wet al.. Aerodynamic characteristics of double-connected train groups composed of different kinds of high-speed trains under crosswinds: A comparison study [J]. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 2023, 64: 465-481

[12] Chen Z-w, Liu T-h, Jiang Z-het al.. Comparative analysis of the effect of different nose lengths on train aerodynamic performance under crosswind [J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2018, 78: 69-85

[13] Guo Z-j, Liu T-h, Chen Z-wet al.. Aerodynamic influences of bogie’s geometric complexity on high-speed trains under crosswind [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2020, 196: 104053

[14] Huang J-y, Yao S, Cao Y-het al.. Study on the overturning stability of double-deck high-speed EMU under crosswind [J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2023, 20(4): 1160-1170(in Chinese)

[15] Zhao C-l, Wang T-t, Zhou Get al.. Wind tunnel experimental investigation on the performance of the ice-melting system for high-speed train bogies [J]. Transportation Safety and Environment, 2025, 7: tdae022

[16] Huang F-y, Xu A, Zhang Jet al.. A passive flow control method with winglets installed on leeward side of a high-speed train for improvement of anti-overturning performance under crosswinds [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2025, 37(3): 035180

[17] Han S, Xiang N-s, Huang F-yet al.. On reducing high-speed train slipstream using vortex generators [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2025, 375055115

[18] Sun B, Chen G, Chen Jet al.. Performance of a vehicle-mounted anemometer under crosswind: Simulation and experiment [J]. Transportation Safety and Environment, 2023, 53tdac053

[19] Tang L-b, He X-h, Yan Let al.. Experimental study of aerodynamic characteristics of high-speed train on bridge-tunnel junctions under crosswinds [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2023, 302613-624

[20] Zhao L, Deng E, Yang W-cet al.. Unraveling the impact of cutting transition section on the aerodynamic loads of high-speed trains: Utilizing the IDDES approach [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2024, 31(3): 989-1002

[21] Mohebbi M, Ma Y, Mohebbi Ret al.. The influence of inclined barriers on airflow over a high speed train under crosswind condition [M]. New Research on Railway Engineering and Transportation, 2023

[22] Mohebbi M, Safaee A M. The optimum model determination of porous barriers in high-speed tracks [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2022, 236(1): 15-25

[23] Mohebbi M, Ma Y, Mohebbi R. The analysis of utilizing multiple fences in high-speed tracks on the aerodynamic characteristics of a high-speed train model [J]. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Mechanical Engineering, 2024, 48(3): 847-863

[24] ZHANG Jie, HAN Shuai, JI Peng, et al. Windproof performance improvement of windbreak walls on the transition connecting a realistic embankment and a hill cut along the high-speed railway [J]. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines, 2025: 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15397734.2025.2510583.

[25] Cheng S-j, Liu T-h, Li W-het al.. Numerical study on reasonable lengths of wind barriers with different thicknesses in wind tunnel tests [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2023, 30(4): 1388-1404

[26] Yang Z-y, Xu G, Wu Fet al.. The influence of the leading-edge angle of subgrade on the aerodynamic loads of a high-speed train in a wind tunnel [J]. Transportation Safety and Environment, 2024, 6(2): tdad020

[27] Dong H-g, Cheng J-j, Ma B-tet al.. Characteristics of wind-sand transportation along railways in the eastern fringe of the Taklimakan Desert and sand control system [J]. Transportation Safety and Environment, 2024, 63tdad042

[28] Li L, Zhao P, Song W-bet al.. A research on layout of 350 km/h double-deck EMU trains service facilities [J]. China Transportation Review, 2018, 408122-126(in Chinese)

[29] Railway applications-Aerodynamics-Part 4: Requirements and test procedures for aerodynamics on open track: CEN EN 14067-4 [S].

[30] Wang S-b, Burton D, Herbst A Het al.. The impact of rails on high-speed train slipstream and wake [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2020, 198: 104114

[31] Xia C, Wang H-f, Shan X-zet al.. Effects of ground configurations on the slipstream and near wake of a high-speed train [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2017, 168: 177-189

[32] Wang L, Liu T-h, Chen Z-wet al.. Evaluation of the slipstream in different regions around a train with respect to different nose lengths: A comparison study [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2024, 31(9): 3295-3311

[33] Malikov Z M, Madaliev M E, Chernyshev S Let al.. Validation of a two-fluid turbulence model in comsol multiphysics for the problem of flow around aerodynamic profiles [J]. Scientific Reports, 2024, 14: 2306

[34] Uraisamy K, Iaccarino G, Xiao H. Turbulence modeling in the age of data [J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2019, 51: 357-377

[35] Szudarek M, Piechna A, Prusiński Pet al.. CFD study of high-speed train in crosswinds for large yaw angles with RANS-based turbulence models including GEKO tuning approach [J]. Energies, 2022, 15(18): 6549

[36] Lenci G, Feng J-y, Baglietto E. A generally applicable hybrid unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes closure scaled by turbulent structures [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2021, 3310105117

[37] Israel D M. The myth of URANS [J]. Journal of Turbulence, 2023, 248367-392

[38] de Girolamo F, Castorrini A, Barnabei V Fet al.. Detached eddy simulation of large scale wind turbine wake in offshore environment [J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2024, 110: 109637

[39] Shur M L, Spalart P R, Strelets M Ket al.. A hybrid RANS-LES approach with delayed-DES and wallmodelled LES capabilities [J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2008, 29(6): 1638-1649

[40] Dunlop J A, Thompson M C. Reducing slipstream velocities around high-speed trains through retractable stationary surfaces [J]. European Journal of Mechanics-B/Fluids, 2023, 100: 141-162

[41] Xiong X-h, Geng J-x, Wang K-wet al.. Effect of wing height layout on the aerodynamic performance of high-speed train [J]. International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow, 2024, 34(10): 3731-3763

[42] Gu H-y, Liu T-h, Jiang Z-wet al.. Research on the wind-sheltering performance of different forms of corrugated wind barriers on railway bridges [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2020, 201: 104166

[43] Xue R-d, Xiong X-h, Li X-bet al.. Influence of turbulent incoming flow on aerodynamic behaviors of train at 90° yaw angle [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2023, 35: 015121

[44] Chen G, Li X-b, Liang X-f. IDDES simulation of the performance and wake dynamics of the wind turbines under different turbulent inflow conditions [J]. Energy, 2022, 238: 121772

[45] Zhang J, Ding Y-s, Wang Y-het al.. A novel bionic Coleoptera pantograph deflector for aerodynamic drag reduction of a high-speed train [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2023, 30(6): 2064-2080

[46] Zhang Z-z, Zhou D. Wind tunnel experiment on aerodynamic characteristic of streamline head of high speed train with different head of high speed train with different head shapes [J]. Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology), 2013, 44(6): 2603-2608(in Chinese)

[47] Niu J-q, Zhou D, Li Z-wet al.. Research on aerodynamic performance of high-speed train through canyon wind zone [J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2014, 36(6): 9-14(in Chinese)

[48] Siddiqui N A. Experimental and numerical investigation of the flow structures at the rear of three-dimensional bluff bodies [D], 2023, Ontario, Canada, University of Ontario Institute of Technology

[49] Zhang Y-n, Qiu X, Chen F-pet al.. A selected review of vortex identification methods with applications [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2018, 30(5): 767-779

[50] Pope S B. Turbulent flows [J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 2001, 12(11): 2020-2021

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Central South University