Optimization of crosswind stability for high-speed trains: Aerodynamic analysis of leeward winglet deflection angles

Abstract

The stability of high-speed trains under crosswind conditions has become a key consideration in aerodynamic design. As running speeds continue to increase and car body weight decreases, crosswinds pose a greater risk to train safety, significantly lowering the critical wind velocity. Therefore, developing strategies to enhance crosswind stability is essential. This study focuses on the leeward region adjacent to the train body, where separated flows with large vortices generate significant negative surface pressure. Enhancing this negative pressure distribution is proposed as a potential method to improve a train’s resistance to overturning. To achieve this, winglets are installed on the leeward side as a flow control measure, and their effects at different deflection angles are evaluated. The influence of five deflection angles on the leeward-side flow field and aerodynamic loads is analyzed, considering the head, middle, and tail cars. Results indicate that a deflection angle of 90° optimally reduces the overall overturning moment by 27.6% compared to the baseline model in a three-car configuration. These findings highlight that optimizing the winglet deflection angle to approximately 90° can significantly enhance a train’s resistance to overturning, offering valuable insights for aerodynamic optimization in strong wind conditions.

Keywords

high-speed train / winglet / crosswind / passive flow control / leeward vortex

References

[1] LiuT-h, WangL, GaoH-r, et al.. Research progress on train operation safety in Xinjiang railway under wind environment [J]. Transportation Safety and Environment, 2022, 42tdac005

[2] DongH-g, ChengJ-j, MaB-t, et al.. Characteristics of wind-sand transportation along railways in the eastern fringe of the Taklimakan Desert and sand control system [J]. Transportation Safety and Environment, 2024, 63tdad042

[3] TangL-b, HeX-h, YanL, et al.. Experimental study of aerodynamic characteristics of high-speed train on bridge-tunnel junctions under crosswinds [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2023, 30(2): 613-624

[4] HemidaH. Contribution of computational wind engineering in train aerodynamics: Past and future [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2023, 234105352

[5] ZhaoL, DengE, YangW-c, et al.. Unraveling the impact of cutting transition section on the aerodynamic loads of high-speed trains: Utilizing the IDDES approach [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2024, 31(3): 989-1002

[6] ChengS-j, LiuT-h, LiW-h, et al.. Numerical study on reasonable lengths of wind barriers with different thicknesses in wind tunnel tests [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2023, 30(4): 1388-1404

[7] ZhangJ, WangY-h, WangY-g, et al.. Pressure wave characteristics in high-speed maglev tunnels with various arch lattice-shell lengths inside hoods [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2025, 372026125

[8] ZhangJ, ZhangM-l, HanS, et al.. A novel asymptotic linear method for micro-pressure wave mitigation at high-speed maglev tunnel exit: A case study with various open ratios on tunnel hoods [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2025, 32(5): 1955-1972

[9] HuangZ-x, LiW-h, ChenL. Effects of the Reynolds number on train aerodynamics considering air compressibility: A wind tunnel study [J]. Transportation Safety and Environment, 2024, 64tdae006

[10] SunB, ChenG, ChenJ, et al.. Performance of a vehicle-mounted anemometer under crosswind: Simulation and experiment [J]. Transportation Safety and Environment, 2023, 53tdac053

[11] ZHANG Jie, et al. Windproof performance improvement of windbreak walls on the transition connecting a realistic embankment and a hill cut along the high-speed railway [J]. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines, 2025: 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15397734.2025.2510583.

[12] GAO Guang-jun, et al. A smooth-guiding method for aerodynamic drag reduction on key regions of a high-speed train [J]. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines, 2025: 1–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15397734.2025.2537310.

[13] ChenZ-w, LiuT-h, JiangZ-h, et al.. Comparative analysis of the effect of different nose lengths on train aerodynamic performance under crosswind [J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2018, 78: 69-85

[14] HuoX-s, LiuT-h, ChenZ-w, et al.. Aerodynamic characteristics of double-connected train groups composed of different kinds of high-speed trains under crosswinds: A comparison study [J]. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 2023, 64: 465-481

[15] LiX-f, ZhouD, JiaL-r, et al.. Effects of yaw angle on the unsteady aerodynamic performance of the pantograph of a high-speed train under crosswind [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2018, 182: 49-60

[16] GuoZ-j, LiuT-h, ChenZ-w, et al.. Aerodynamic influences of bogie’s geometric complexity on high-speed trains under crosswind [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2020, 196104053

[17] ZhangJ, DingY-s, WangF, et al.. Comparison of aerodynamic performance of trains running on bridges under crosswinds using various motion modes [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2023, 3512125125

[18] ZhangJ, XuA, HuangF-y, et al.. A novel vortex control method for improving anti-overturning performance of a high-speed train with leeward airbag structures under crosswinds [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2024, 366065146

[19] ZhouD, XiaC-j, WuL-l, et al.. Effect of the wind speed on aerodynamic behaviours during the acceleration of a high-speed train under crosswinds [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2023, 232105287

[20] ChenJ-z, XuA, LiuT-h, et al.. On enhancing anti-overturning performance of a high-speed train with side airfoils in crosswinds [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2025, 264106151

[21] ChenZ-w, NiY-q, WangY-w, et al.. Mitigating crosswind effect on high-speed trains by active blowing method: A comparative study [J]. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 2022, 16(1): 1064-1081

[22] HuangF-y, XuA, ZhangJ, et al.. A passive flow control method with winglets installed on leeward side of a high-speed train for improvement of anti-overturning performance under crosswinds [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2025, 373035180

[23] HanS, XiangN-s, HuangF-y, et al.. On reducing high-speed train slipstream using vortex generators [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2025, 375055115

[24] National Standardization AdministrationGauge for standard gauge railways—Part 2: Structure gauge: GB 146.2–2020 [S], 2020, Beijing. Standards Press of China.

[25] European Committee for StandardizationRailway applications—Aerodynamics—Part 6: Requirements and test procedures for cross wind assessment: BS EN 14067-6: 2018+A1: 2022 [S], 2022, London. British Standards Institution.

[26] LiW-h, LiuT-h, ZhouL, et al.. Impact of ballast length on train aerodynamics for a wind tunnel layout via CFD analysis [J]. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 2023, 65: 275-293

[27] YangZ-y, XuG, WuF, et al.. The influence of the leading-edge angle of subgrade on the aerodynamic loads of a high-speed train in a wind tunnel [J]. Transportation Safety and Environment, 2024, 62tdad020

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Central South University

Just Accepted

This article has successfully passed peer review and final editorial review, and will soon enter typesetting, proofreading and other publishing processes. The currently displayed version is the accepted final manuscript. The officially published version will be updated with format, DOI and citation information upon launch. We recommend that you pay attention to subsequent journal notifications and preferentially cite the officially published version. Thank you for your support and cooperation.