Experimental study on electrode materials characteristics for dewatering and remediation of copper-contaminated sediment from Tai Lake based on vacuum electro-osmosis

Abstract

The vacuum electro-osmosis method enables integrated treatment of heavy metal-contaminated sediments by simultaneously removing water and pollutants. This study focuses on the dredged sediments from Tai Lake and investigates the performance of five electrode materials (electrokinetic geo-synthetics, graphite, aluminum, iron, and copper) in the vacuum electro-osmotic treatment process through a self-designed test system. Multiple aspects, including drainage volume, settlement, current, effective potential, pollutant removal efficiency, and energy consumption, were analyzed. The results indicate that using copper as an electrode material has the best dewatering effect but poorer copper pollutant removal efficiency. On the other hand, using electrokinetic geo-synthetics as an electrode material demonstrates the best copper pollutant removal efficiency, with dewatering effect second only to copper, highlighting the superiority of electrokinetic geo-synthetics material in integrated dewatering and remediation treatment. When using metal as an electrode material, the anode electrode corrosion is more severe, which significantly affects various parameters of the vacuum electro-osmotic process and the treatment outcomes. The introduction of vacuum pressure alters the conventional trend of continuous decay in effective potential during the traditional electro-osmotic process. It causes a rebound in effective potential during the later stages of treatment, and the magnitude of this rebound is influenced by the electrode material’s ability to accommodate deformation.

Keywords

electrode material / heavy metal contamination / dewatering / remediation / vacuum preloading / electroosmosis

References

[[1]] Rajeshkumar S, Liu Y, Zhang X-y, et al.. Studies on seasonal pollution of heavy metals in water, sediment, fish and oyster from the Meiliang Bay of Taihu Lake in China. Chemosphere, 2018, 191: 626-638, J]

[[2]] Li Y, Zhou S-l, Zhu Q, et al.. One-century sedimentary record of heavy metal pollution in western Taihu Lake, China. Environmental Pollution, 2018, 240: 709-716, J]

[[3]] Wu Y-j, Xu Y, Zhang X-d, et al.. Experimental study on vacuum preloading consolidation of landfill sludge conditioned by Fenton’s reagent under varying filter pore size. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2021, 49(1): 109-121, J]

[[4]] Xu Y, Wu Y-j, Zhang X-d, et al.. Effects of freeze-thaw and chemical preconditioning on the consolidation properties and microstructure of landfill sludge. Water Research, 2021, 200: 117249, J]

[[5]] Mulligan C N, Yong R N, Gibbs B F. An evaluation of technologies for the heavy metal remediation of dredged sediments. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2001, 85(1–2): 145-163, J]

[[6]] Peng J, Xiong X, Mahfouz A H, et al.. Vacuum preloading combined electroosmotic strengthening of ultrasoft soil. Journal of Central South University, 2013, 20(11): 3282-3295, J]

[[7]] Liu H-l, Cui Y-l, Shen Y, et al.. A new method of combination of electroosmosis, vacuum and surcharge preloading for soft ground improvement. China Ocean Engineering, 2014, 28(4): 511-528, J]

[[8]] Li X-b, Zhao R, Fu H-t, et al.. Slurry improvement by vacuum preloading and electro-osmosis. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 172(2): 145-154, J]

[[9]] Acar Y B, Gale R J, Alshawabkeh A N, et al.. Electrokinetic remediation: Basics and technology status. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1995, 40(2): 117-137, J]

[[10]] Wen D-d, Fu R-b, Li Qian. Removal of inorganic contaminants in soil by electrokinetic remediation technologies: A review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 401: 123345, J]

[[11]] Kim D H, Ryu B G, Park S W, et al.. Electrokinetic remediation of Zn and Ni-contaminated soil. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 165(1–3): 501-505, J]

[[12]] Xu H-c, Zhang C-p, Zhang H, et al.. Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of heterogeneous aquifer co-contaminated with Cr(VI) and nitrate by rhamnolipids. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2022, 10(5): 108531, J]

[[13]] Shang J Q, Lo K Y. Electrokinetic dewatering of a phosphate clay. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1997, 55(1–3): 117-133, J]

[[14]] Segall B A, Bruell C J. Electroosmotic contaminant-removal processes. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 1992, 118(1): 84-100, J]

[[15]] Xue Z-j, Tang X-w, Yang Q, et al.. Comparison of electro-osmosis experiments on marine sludge with different electrode materials. Drying Technology, 2015, 33(8): 986-995, J]

[[16]] Mohamedelhassan E, Shang J Q. Effects of electrode materials and current intermittence in electroosmosis. Ground Improvement, 2001, 5(1): 3-11, J]

[[17]] Zhou J, Tao Y-l, Xu C-j, et al.. Electroosmotic strengthening of silts based on selected electrode materials. Soils and Foundations, 2015, 55(5): 1171-1180, J]

[[18]] PUGH R C. The application of electrokinetic geosynthetic materials to uses in the construction industry [D]. Newcastle University, 2002. http://theses.ncl.ac.uk/jspui/handle/10443/923.

[[19]] Ling J-m, Li X, Qian J-s, et al.. Performance comparison of different electrode materials for electro-osmosis treatment on subgrade soil. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 271: 121590, J]

[[20]] Xiao F, Guo K-s, Zhuang Y-feng. Study on electroosmotic consolidation of sludge using EKG. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 2021, 7(2): 33, J]

[[21]] Tao Y-l, Zhou J, Gong X-nan. Comparative experimental study on electroosmosis of iron, graphite, copper and aluminum electrodes. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32(S2): 3355-3362 [J]

[[22]] Wang Y-c, Han Z-j, Li A, et al.. Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of heavy metals contaminated soil by biodegradable complexing agents. Environmental Pollution, 2021, 283: 117111, J]

[[23]] Tang J, Qiu Z-p, Tang H-j, et al.. Coupled with EDDS and approaching anode technique enhanced electrokinetic remediation removal heavy metal from sludge. Environmental Pollution, 2021, 272: 115975, J]