Assessment of rigorous solutions for pseudo-dynamic slope stability: Finite-element limit-analysis modelling

Jian-feng Zhou , Zi-yu Zheng , Ting Bao , Bing-xiong Tu , Jian Yu , Chang-bing Qin

Journal of Central South University ›› 2023, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (7) : 2374 -2391.

PDF
Journal of Central South University ›› 2023, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (7) : 2374 -2391. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-023-5370-0
Article

Assessment of rigorous solutions for pseudo-dynamic slope stability: Finite-element limit-analysis modelling

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

This study developed a finite-element lower-bound procedure to investigate seismic slope stability in homogeneous and non-homogeneous soils. In order to account for dynamic earthquake inputs, horizontal and vertical accelerations are expressed by the pseudo-dynamic approach, in the form of sinusoidal functions. Within the framework of lower-bound theory, the seismic slope stability analysis is transformed to a linear programming problem subjected to: stress equilibrium, stress discontinuity, stress boundary and yield conditions. An interior-point algorithm implemented into MATLAB was adopted to seek optimal lower-bound solutions of slope bearing capacity and safety factor. The proposed procedure for lower-bound analysis of seismic slope stability was validated by comparing the slope safety factor obtained from different approaches including limit equilibrium and Abaqus. A nonuniform soil slope with linearly varied and layered soil strength parameters and non-associated flow rule are considered, and the corresponding effects on seismic slope stability are discussed. The true solution of safety factor to seismic slope stability is well assessed by rigorous lower and upper bounds with the discrepancy no greater than 4.5%.

Keywords

seismic slope stability / finite-element limit-analysis modelling / pseudo-dynamic approach / true solution

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jian-feng Zhou, Zi-yu Zheng, Ting Bao, Bing-xiong Tu, Jian Yu, Chang-bing Qin. Assessment of rigorous solutions for pseudo-dynamic slope stability: Finite-element limit-analysis modelling. Journal of Central South University, 2023, 30(7): 2374-2391 DOI:10.1007/s11771-023-5370-0

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

QinC B, ChianS C. Kinematic analysis of seismic slope stability with a discretisation technique and pseudo-dynamic approach: A new perspective [J]. Géotechnique, 2018, 68(6): 492-503

[2]

QinC-b, ChianS C, DuS-zhao. Revisiting seismic slope stability: Intermediate or below-the-toe failure? [J]. Géotechnique, 2020, 70(1): 71-79

[3]

ZhouJ-f, QinC-b, PanQ-j, et al. . Kinematic analysis of geosynthetics-reinforced steep slopes with curved sloping surfaces and under earthquake regions [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2019, 26(7): 1755-1768

[4]

TangR-h, MaoF-s, ChenC-f, et al. . Upper bound solution for active thrust of nonhomogeneous cohesive soil considering effects of intermediate principal stress [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2022, 29(2): 582-595

[5]

LyuC, WangZ-h, ZengZ-q, et al. . Limit analysis of ultimate uplift capacity and failure mechanism of shallow plate anchors in multi-layered soils [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2022, 29(6): 2049-2061

[6]

QinC-b, ChianS C. Seismic stability of geosynthetic-reinforced walls with variable excitation and soil properties: A discretization-based kinematic analysis [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2018, 102: 196-205

[7]

YangX-l, WeiJ-jing. Seismic stability for reinforced 3D slope in unsaturated soils with pseudo-dynamic approach [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2021, 134: 104124

[8]

YangX-l, YinJ-hua. Slope stability analysis with nonlinear failure criterion [J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2004, 130(3): 267-273

[9]

YangX L, HuangF. Collapse mechanism of shallow tunnel based on nonlinear Hoek-Brown failure criterion [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2011, 26(6): 686-691

[10]

YangX-l, YinJ-hua. Upper bound solution for ultimate bearing capacity with a modified Hoek-Brown failure criterion [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2005, 42(4): 550-560

[11]

LiZ-w, YangX-li. Analysis and design charts for 3D active earth pressure in cohesive soils with cracks [J]. Acta Geotechnica, 2021, 16(10): 3269-3283

[12]

XuJ-s, DuX-l, YangX-li. Stability analysis of 3D geosynthetic-reinforced earth structures composed of nonhomogeneous cohesive backfills [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 126105768

[13]

XuJ-s, WangP-f, HuangF, et al. . Active earth pressure of 3D earth retaining structure subjected to rainfall infiltration [J]. Engineering Geology, 2021, 293106294

[14]

ZongM-f, TianY, LiangR-z, et al. . One-dimensional nonlinear consolidation analysis of soil with continuous drainage boundary [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2022, 29(1): 270-281

[15]

WuW-b, WangZ-q, ZhangY-p, et al. . Semi-analytical solution for negative skin friction development on deep foundations in coastal reclamation areas [J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2023, 241107981

[16]

LysmerJ. Limit analysis of plane problems in soil mechanics [J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 1970, 96(4): 1311-1334

[17]

BotteroA, NegreR, PastorJ, et al. . Finite element method and limit analysis theory for soil mechanics problems [J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1980, 22(1): 131-149

[18]

SloanS W. Lower bound limit analysis using finite elements and linear programming [J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1988, 12(1): 61-77

[19]

SloanS W. Upper bound limit analysis using finite elements and linear programming [J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1989, 13(3): 263-282

[20]

SloanS W. Geotechnical stability analysis [J]. Géotechnique, 2013, 63(7): 531-571

[21]

SloanS W, KleemanP W. Upper bound limit analysis using discontinuous velocity fields [J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1995, 127(1–4): 293-314

[22]

ZhouJ-f, ChenQ-s, WangJ-xing. Rigid block based lower-bound limit analysis method for stability analysis of fractured rock mass considering rock bridge effects [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2017, 86173-180

[23]

QinC-b, ZhouJ-feng. On the seismic stability of soil slopes containing dual weak layers: True failure load assessment by finite-element limit-analysis [J]. Acta Geotechnica, 2023, 18(6): 3153-3175

[24]

ZhouJ-f, WangJ-xing. Lower bound limit analysis of wedge stability using block element method [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2017, 86: 120-128

[25]

ZhouJ-f, QinC-bing. Stability analysis of unsaturated soil slopes under reservoir drawdown and rainfall conditions: Steady and transient state analysis [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2022, 142104541

[26]

ZhouJ-f, QinC-bing. Influence of soft band on seismic slope stability by finite-element limit-analysis modelling [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2023, 158105396

[27]

LoukidisD, BandiniP, SalgadoR. Stability of seismically loaded slopes using limit analysis [J]. Géotechnique, 2003, 53(5): 463-479

[28]

ShiauJ S, LyaminA V, SloanS W. Bearing capacity of a sand layer on clay by finite element limit analysis [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2003, 40(5): 900-915

[29]

WilsonD W, AbboA J, SloanS W, et al. . Undrained stability of dual square tunnels [J]. Acta Geotechnica, 2015, 10(5): 665-682

[30]

XiaoY, ZhaoM-h, ZhaoH, et al. . Finite element limit analysis of the bearing capacity of strip footing on a rock mass with voids [J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2018, 18(9): 04018108

[31]

UkritchonB, KeawsawasvongS. Lower bound stability analysis of plane strain headings in Hoek-Brown rock masses [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 8499-112

[32]

SteedmanR S, ZengX. The influence of phase on the calculation of pseudo-static earth pressure on a retaining wall [J]. Géotechnique, 1990, 40(1): 103-112

[33]

BashaB M, BabuG L S. Seismic reliability assessment of internal stability of reinforced soil walls using the pseudo-dynamic method [J]. Geosynthetics International, 2011, 18(5): 221-241

[34]

NimbalkarS, ChoudhuryD. Sliding stability and seismic design of retaining wall by pseudo-dynamic method for passive case [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2007, 27(6): 497-505

[35]

PainA, ChoudhuryD, BhattacharyyaS K. Seismic stability of retaining wall - soil sliding interaction using modified pseudo-dynamic method [J]. Géotechnique Letters, 2015, 5(1): 56-61

[36]

ZhouJ-f, QinC-bing. Finite-element upper-bound analysis of seismic slope stability considering pseudo-dynamic approach [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2020, 122103530

[37]

ZhangYin. Solving large-scale linear programs by interior-point methods under the Matlab Environment [J]. Optimization Methods and Software, 1998, 10(1): 1-31

[38]

MehrotraS. On the implementation of a primal-dual interior point method [J]. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 1992, 2(4): 575-601

[39]

WANG Lu-qi, XIAO Ting, LIU Song-lin, et al. Quantification of model uncertainty and variability for landslide displacement prediction based on Monte Carlo simulation [J]. Gondwana Research, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.03.006.

[40]

LiuH-l, ChuJ, KavazanjianE. Biogeotechnics: A new frontier in geotechnical engineering for sustainability [J]. Biogeotechnics, 2023, 1(1): 100001

[41]

ZhangY, HuX-l, WangY-j, et al. . A critical review of biomineralization in environmental geotechnics: Applications, trends, and perspectives [J]. Biogeotechnics, 2023, 11100003

[42]

NieJ-y, CuiY-f, SenetakisK, et al. . Predicting residual friction angle of lunar regolith based on Chang’e-5 lunar samples [J]. Science Bulletin, 2023, 687730-739

[43]

ZHOU Hai-zuo, HU Qi-chao, YU Xiao-xuan, et al. Quantitative bearing capacity assessment of strip footings adjacent to two-layered slopes considering spatial soil variability [J]. Acta Geotechnica, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-023-01875-8.

[44]

ZhouH-z, ShiY-p, YuX-x, et al. . Failure mechanism and bearing capacity of rigid footings placed on top of cohesive soil slopes in spatially random soil [J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2023, 23804023110

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

126

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/