Aerodynamic interference effects between a triple-box girder and trains on aerodynamic forces and vortex-induced vibration

Ling-bo Yang , Xu-gang Hua , Chao-qun Wang , Dong-sheng He , Zheng-qing Chen

Journal of Central South University ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (8) : 2532 -2541.

PDF
Journal of Central South University ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (8) : 2532 -2541. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-022-5104-8
Article

Aerodynamic interference effects between a triple-box girder and trains on aerodynamic forces and vortex-induced vibration

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Wind tunnel tests were carried out to investigate the aerodynamic interference between a triple-box girder and trains, involving static aerodynamic forces and vortex-induced vibrations (VIVs). Static and dynamic sectional models of the girder and trains were employed for aerodynamic force measurement and VIV test, respectively. Results indicate that the aerodynamic interference effect on static aerodynamic forces of both the girder and trains is remarkable. When a single train exists, the horizontal position of the train has a small effect on aerodynamic coefficients of the girder. When two trains meet on the girder, the drag coefficient of the girder is significantly reduced compared with that of without train or with a single train; besides, during the whole meeting process, aerodynamic forces of the leeward train first drop and then increase suddenly. The fluctuation of aerodynamic force could cause redundant vibration of the train, which is unfavorable for safety and comfort. A train on the girder could worsen the girder VIV performance: a new vertical VIV appears in the triple-box girder when a train is on the girder, and the torsional VIV amplitude increases significantly when the train is on the windward side.

Keywords

triple-box girder / wind tunnel test / train-girder system / aerodynamic interference / vortex-induced vibration

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ling-bo Yang, Xu-gang Hua, Chao-qun Wang, Dong-sheng He, Zheng-qing Chen. Aerodynamic interference effects between a triple-box girder and trains on aerodynamic forces and vortex-induced vibration. Journal of Central South University, 2022, 29(8): 2532-2541 DOI:10.1007/s11771-022-5104-8

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

HuangZ-W, LiY-Z, HuaX-G, et al.. Automatic identification of bridge vortex-induced vibration using random decrement method [J]. Applied Sciences, 2019, 9(10): 2049

[2]

SarpkayaT. A critical review of the intrinsic nature of vortex-induced vibrations [J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2004, 194389-447

[3]

WangC-Q, HuaX-G, HuangZ-W, et al.. Post-critical behavior of galloping for main cables of suspension bridges in construction phases [J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2021, 101: 103205

[4]

WangC-Q, HuaX-G, HuangZ-W, et al.. Aerodynamic characteristics of coupled twin circular bridge hangers with near wake interference [J]. Applied Sciences, 2021, 11(9): 4189

[5]

HuaX-G, WangC-Q, LiS-L, et al.. Experimental investigation of wind-induced vibrations of main cables for suspension bridges in construction phases [J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2020, 93102846

[6]

XuH-J, DengH-Z, HuX-Y, et al.. Wind tunnel test on aerodynamic coefficients of multi-bundled conductors under skew winds [J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2019, 91102702

[7]

HuC, ZhouZ, JiangB. Effects of types of bridge decks on competitive relationships between aerostatic and flutter stability for a super long cable-stayed bridge [J]. Wind and Structures, 2019, 284255-270

[8]

LiuJ-Y, HuiY, WangJ-X, et al.. LES study of windward-face-mounted-ribs’ effects on flow fields and aerodynamic forces on a square cylinder [J]. Building and Environment, 2021, 200107950

[9]

HeX-H, ZuoT-H, ZouY-F, et al.. Experimental study on aerodynamic characteristics of a high-speed train on viaducts in turbulent crosswinds [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2020, 27(8): 2465-2478

[10]

ZhuS-Y, LiY-L, KoffiT, et al.. Case study of random vibration analysis of train-bridge systems subjected to wind loads [J]. Wind & Structures, 2018, 27(6): 399-416

[11]

WangB, XuY-L, ZhuL-D, et al.. Determination of aerodynamic forces on stationary/moving vehicle-bridge deck system under crosswinds using computational fluid dynamics [J]. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 2013, 7(3): 355-368

[12]

HanY, LiuY, HuP, et al.. Effect of unsteady aerodynamic loads on driving safety and comfort of trains running on bridges [J]. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2020, 23(13): 2898-2910

[13]

BakerC J, ReynoldsS. Wind-induced accidents of road vehicles [J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 1992, 24(6): 559-575

[14]

SchetzJ A. Aerodynamics of high-speed trains [J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2001, 33371-414

[15]

LarsenA, SavageM, LafrenièreA, et al.. Investigation of vortex response of a twin box bridge section at high and low Reynolds numbers [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2008, 96(6–7): 934-944

[16]

NagaoF, UtsunomiyaH, YoshiokaE, et al.. Effects of handrails on separated shear flow and vortex-induced oscillation [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1997, 69–71: 819-827

[17]

KwokK C S, QinX R, FokC H, et al.. Wind-induced pressures around a sectional twin-deck bridge model: Effects of gap-width on the aerodynamic forces and vortex shedding mechanisms [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2012, 110: 50-61

[18]

WuB-C, LaimaS-J. Experimental study on characteristics of vortex-induced vibration of a twin-box girder and damping effects [J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2021, 103103282

[19]

DianaG, RestaF, ZassoA, et al.. Forced motion and free motion aeroelastic tests on a new concept dynamometric section model of the Messina suspension bridge [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2004, 92(6): 441-462

[20]

DianaG, RestaF, BelloliM, et al.. On the vortex shedding forcing on suspension bridge deck [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2006, 94(5): 341-363

[21]

WangC-Q, HuaX-G, FengZ-Q, et al.. Experimental investigation on vortex-induced vibrations of a triple-box girder with web modification [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2021, 218104783

[22]

XuL, HuiY, YangQ-S, et al.. Modeling and modal analysis of suspension bridge based on continual formula method [J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2022, 162107855

[23]

HUA Xu-gang, WANG Chao-qun. Segment model wind tunnel test report on wind resistance research of Taoyamen bridge main bridge [R]. Key Laboratory for Wind and Bridge Engineering of Hunan Province, Hunan University, 2021. (in Chinese)

[24]

SimiuE, ScanlanR HWind effects on structures: an introduction to wind engineering [M], 1978, Washington, D. C., Wiley

[25]

LiY-L, XuX-Y, GuoJ-M, et al.. Wind tunnel tests on aerodynamic characteristics of vehicle-bridge system for six-track double-deck steel-truss railway bridge [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2016, 33(4): 130-135

[26]

LiT, DaiZ-Y, LiuJ-L, et al.. Review on aerodynamic drag reduction optimization of high-speed trains in china [J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2021, 21(1): 59-80

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

109

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/