Characteristics of aerodynamic force and flow structure behind single box girder under isolated slit control

Guan-bin Chen , Wen-li Chen

Journal of Central South University ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (8) : 2542 -2557.

PDF
Journal of Central South University ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (8) : 2542 -2557. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-022-5089-3
Article

Characteristics of aerodynamic force and flow structure behind single box girder under isolated slit control

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

An isolated slit was placed in a single box girder to obtain passive leading-edge suction and trailing-edge jet flow to control the unsteady aerodynamic force and modify the flow structure. The Great Belt East Bridge was used as a physical model at a geometric scale of 1:125. Wind tunnel experiments were conducted at an incoming airflow speed of 10 m/s, and the Reynolds number was calculated as 2.3×104 using the test model height and wind speed. The surface pressure distribution was measured, and the aerodynamic force acting on the test model with and without the isolated slit was calculated by integrating the pressure result. It was found that the control using an isolated slit can dramatically decrease the fluctuating surface pressure distribution and aerodynamic force. An analysis on the power spectral density of the lift force revealed that the isolated slit accelerated vortex shedding. Moreover, high-speed particle image velocimetry was used to investigate the wake flow structure behind the test model. A vortex separated from the upper surface was pushed to a lower location and the wake flow structure was modified by the isolated slit. A proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) of the flow field showed that the first two POD modes in the controlled case contributed less energy than those in the uncontrolled case, indicating that more energy was transferred to higher modes, and small-scale vortices had more energy. A secondary instability structure was found in the wake flow for a nondimensional jet momentum coefficient J of 0.0667.

Keywords

single box girder / isolated slit / aerodynamic force / proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) mode

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Guan-bin Chen, Wen-li Chen. Characteristics of aerodynamic force and flow structure behind single box girder under isolated slit control. Journal of Central South University, 2022, 29(8): 2542-2557 DOI:10.1007/s11771-022-5089-3

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

YuanW-Y, LaimaS-J, ChenW-L, et al.. Investigation on the vortex-and-wake-induced vibration of a separated-box bridge girder [J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2017, 70: 145-161

[2]

ChenG-B, ZhangL-Q, ChenW-L, et al.. Self-suction-and-jet control in flow regime and unsteady force for a single box girder [J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2019, 24(8): 04019072

[3]

EhsanF, ScanlanR H. Vortex-induced vibrations of flexible bridges [J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1990, 11661392-1411

[4]

LarsenA, EsdahlS, AndersenJ E, et al.. Storebælt suspension bridge-vortex shedding excitation and mitigation by guide vanes [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2000, 88(2–3): 283-296

[5]

FujinoY, YoshidaY. Wind-induced vibration and control of trans-Tokyo bay crossing bridge [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2002, 128(8): 1012-1025

[6]

LiH, LaimaS-J, OuJ-P, et al.. Investigation of vortex-induced vibration of a suspension bridge with two separated steel box girders based on field measurements [J]. Engineering Structures, 2011, 33(6): 1894-1907

[7]

FrandsenJ B. Simultaneous pressures and accelerations measured full-scale on the Great Belt East suspension bridge [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2001, 89(1): 95-129

[8]

BattistaR C, PfeilM S. Reduction of vortex-induced oscillations of Rio-Niterói bridge by dynamic control devices [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2000, 84(3): 273-288

[9]

ChenG-B, ChenW-L, GaoD-L, et al.. Active control of flow structure and unsteady aerodynamic force of box girder with leading-edge suction and trailing-edge jet [J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2021, 120: 110244

[10]

ChenX-Z, KareemA. Efficacy of tuned mass dampers for bridge flutter control [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2003, 129(10): 1291-1300

[11]

GeY-J, ZouX-J, YangY-X. Aerodynamic stabilization of central stabilizers for box girder suspension bridges [J]. Wind and Structures an International Journal, 2009, 12(4): 285-298

[12]

LarsenaA, SvenssonE, AndersenH. Design aspects of tuned mass dampers for the Great Belt East Bridge approach spans [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1995, 54–55413-426

[13]

LaimaS-J, LiH, ChenW-L, et al.. Investigation and control of vortex-induced vibration of twin box girders [J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2013, 39: 205-221

[14]

ZhangH-F, XinD-B, OuJ-P. Wake control of vortex shedding based on spanwise suction of a bridge section model using delayed detached eddy simulation [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2016, 155: 100-114

[15]

BrunoL, ManciniG. Importance of deck details in bridge aerodynamics [J]. Structural Engineering International, 2002, 12(4): 289-294

[16]

ZhouR, YangY-X, GeY-J, et al.. Practical countermeasures for the aerodynamic performance of longspan cable-stayed bridges with open decks [J]. Wind and Structures, 2015, 21(2): 223-239

[17]

OmenzetterP, WildeK, FujinoY. Suppression of wind-induced instabilities of a long span bridge by a passive deck-flaps control system, Part II: Numerical simulations [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2000, 87(1): 81-91

[18]

BobergM, FeltrinG, MartinoliAA novel bridge section model endowed with actively controlled flap arrays mitigating wind impact [C], 2015, Seattle, WA, USA, IEEE, 18371842

[19]

ChenW-L, ChenG-B, XuF, et al.. Suppression of vortex-induced vibration of a circular cylinder by a passive-jet flow control [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2020, 199: 104119

[20]

ZhangL-Q, ChenG-B, ChenW-L, et al.. Separation control on a bridge box girder using a bypass passive jet flow [J]. Applied Sciences, 2017, 7(6): 501

[21]

AmitayM, HonohanA, TrautmanM, et al.Modification of the aerodynamic characteristics of bluff bodies using fluidic actuators [C], 1997, Snowmass Village, CO. Reston, Virginia, AIAA, 2004

[22]

IrwinH P A H, CooperK R, GirardR. Correction of distortion effects caused by tubing systems in measurements of fluctuating pressures [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1979, 51–293-107

[23]

BARLOW J B, RAE W H, POPE A. Low-speed wind tunnel testing [M]. 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1999.

[24]

SamimyM, LeleS K. Motion of particles with inertia in a compressible free shear layer [J]. Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics, 1991, 3(8): 1915-1923

[25]

TAYLOR Z J, GURKA R, KOPP G A. Geometric effects on shedding frequency for bridge sections [C]// Proceedings of the 11th Americas Conference on Wind Engineering. San Juan, Puerto Rico, 2009.

[26]

ChenW-L, GaoD-L, YuanW-Y, et al.. Passive jet control of flow around a circular cylinder [J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2015, 56(11): 1-15

[27]

FrandsenJ BComparison of numerical predictions and full-scale measurements of vortex-induced oscillations [C], 2000, Bochum, Germany, Ruhu-University of Bochum

[28]

ChenW-L, LiH, HuH. An experimental study on a suction flow control method to reduce the unsteadiness of the wind loads acting on a circular cylinder [J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2014, 55(4): 1-20

[29]

OruçV. Passive control of flow structures around a circular cylinder by using screen [J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2012, 33229-242

[30]

SirovichL. Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. I. Coherent structures [J]. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 1987, 45(3): 561-571

[31]

MeyerK E, PedersenJ M, ÖzcanO. A turbulent jet in crossflow analysed with proper orthogonal decomposition [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2007, 583: 199-227

[32]

FengL-H, WangJ-J, PanC. Proper orthogonal decomposition analysis of vortex dynamics of a circular cylinder under synthetic jet control [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2011, 23(1): 014106

[33]

KonstantinidisE, BalabaniS, YianneskisM. Bimodal vortex shedding in a perturbed cylinder wake [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2007, 191011701

[34]

HwangY, KimJ, ChoiH. Stabilization of absolute instability in spanwise wavy two-dimensional wakes [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2013, 727: 346-378

[35]

WilliamsonC K. Vortex dynamics in the cylinder wake [J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1996, 28477-539

[36]

WilliamsonC H K. Three-dimensional wake transition [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1996, 328: 345-407

[37]

DODDIPATLA L S, HANGAN H, DURGESH V. Wake energy redistribution due to trailing edge spanwise perturbation [C]// Proceedings of the BBAA VI International Colloquium on Bluff Bodies Aerodynamics and Applications. Milano, Italy, 2008: 20–24.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

129

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/