Seismic reliability analysis of shield tunnel faces under multiple failure modes by pseudo-dynamic method and response surface method

Jia-hua Zhang , Peng Xu , Wang-cheng Sun , Bo Li

Journal of Central South University ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5) : 1553 -1564.

PDF
Journal of Central South University ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5) : 1553 -1564. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-022-5067-9
Article

Seismic reliability analysis of shield tunnel faces under multiple failure modes by pseudo-dynamic method and response surface method

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

In order to investigate the stability problem of shield tunnel faces subjected to seismic loading, the pseudo-dynamic method (P-DM) was employed to analyze the seismic effect on the face. Two kinds of failure mechanisms of active collapse and passive extrusion were considered, and a seismic reliability model of shield tunnel faces under multi-failure mode was established. The limit analysis method and the response surface method (RSM) were used together to solve the reliability of shield tunnel faces subjected to seismic action. Comparing with existing results, the results of this work are effective. The effects of seismic load and rock mass strength on the collapse pressure, extrusion pressure and reliability index were discussed, and reasonable ranges of support pressure of shield tunnel faces under seismic action were presented. This method can provide a new idea for solving the shield thrust parameter under the seismic loading.

Keywords

shield tunnel face / pseudo-dynamic method / seismic effect / multi-failure mode / support pressure range

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jia-hua Zhang, Peng Xu, Wang-cheng Sun, Bo Li. Seismic reliability analysis of shield tunnel faces under multiple failure modes by pseudo-dynamic method and response surface method. Journal of Central South University, 2022, 29(5): 1553-1564 DOI:10.1007/s11771-022-5067-9

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

AnY, ZhouJ, OuyangP, et al.. Analysis of tunnel face stability with advanced pipes support [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2021, 28(2): 604-617

[2]

TsinidisG, DeS F, AnastasopoulosI, et al.. Seismic behaviour of tunnels: From experiments to analysis [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 99: 103334

[3]

WangZ W, QiaoC S, SongC Y, et al.. Upper bound limit analysis of support pressures of shallow tunnels in layered jointed rock strata [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2014, 43171-183

[4]

QinC B, YangX L, PanQ J, et al.. Upper bound analysis of progressive failure mechanism of tunnel roofs in partly weathered stratified Hoek-Brown rock masses [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2015, 74: 157-162

[5]

ZhangB, WangX, ZhangJ, et al.. Safe range analysis of clear distance of twin shallow tunnels based on limit analysis and reliability theory [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2018, 25(1): 196-207

[6]

HuangM S, LiS, YuJ, et al.. Continuous field based upper bound analysis for three-dimensional tunnel face stability in undrained clay [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2018, 94: 207-213

[7]

YuL, LyuC, WangM N, et al.. Three-dimensional upper bound limit analysis of a deep soil-tunnel subjected to pore pressure based on the nonlinear Mohr-Coulomb criterion [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2019, 112: 293-301

[8]

ChengH Z, ChenJ, ChenR P, et al.. Reliability study on shield tunnel face using a random limit analysis method in multilayered soils [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 84: 353-363

[9]

ChenF Y, WangL, ZhangW G. Reliability assessment on stability of tunnelling perpendicularly beneath an existing tunnel considering spatial variabilities of rock mass properties [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 88: 276-289

[10]

PerazzelliP, AnagnosouG. Upper bound limit analysis of uplift failure in pressurized sealed rock tunnels [J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2018, 42(5): 719-735

[11]

LiD J, ZhaoL H, ChengX, et al.. Upper-bound limit analysis of passive failure of a 3D shallow tunnel face under the bidirectional inclined ground surfaces [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2020, 118: 103310

[12]

ZhuJ, LiX J, LiangJ W. 3D seismic responses of a long lined tunnel in layered poro-viscoelastic half-space by a hybrid FE-BE method [J]. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 2020, 1494-113

[13]

MohsenianV, HajirasoulihaI, MarianiS, et al.. Seismic reliability assessment of RC tunnel-form structures with geometric irregularities using a combined system approach [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2020, 139: 106356

[14]

LyuC, YuL, WangM N, et al.. Upper bound analysis of collapse failure of deep tunnel under karst cave considering seismic force [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2020, 132106003

[15]

ZhangBThree-dimensional stability analysis and reliability study of tunnel faces using upper bound method [D], 2018, Changsha, Central South University(in Chinese)

[16]

PanQ, QuX, WangX. Probabilistic seismic stability of three-dimensional slopes by pseudo-dynamic approach [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2019, 26(7): 1687-1695

[17]

EskandarinejadA, ShafieeA H. Pseudo-dynamic analysis of seismic stability of reinforced slopes considering non-associated flow rule [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2011, 18(6): 2091-2099

[18]

RajeshB G, ChoudhuryD. Stability of seawalls using modified pseudo-dynamic method under earthquake conditions [J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2017, 65154-165

[19]

PainA, ChoudhuryD, BhattacharyyaS K. Seismic rotational stability of gravity retaining walls by modified pseudo-dynamic method [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2017, 94: 244-253

[20]

MichalowskiR L, ParkD. Stability assessment of slopes in rock governed by the Hoek-Brown strength criterion [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2020, 127: 104217

[21]

ZhangY B, LiuX R, LiuX, et al.. Numerical characterization for rock mass integrating GSI/Hoek-Brown system and synthetic rock mass method [J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 2019, 126318-329

[22]

YangX L. Upper bound limit analysis of active earth pressure with different fracture surface and nonlinear yield criterion [J]. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2007, 47(1): 46-56

[23]

YangX L, LiL, YinJ H. Stability analysis of rock slopes with a modified Hoek-Brown failure criterion [J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2004, 28(2): 181-190

[24]

IbrahimE, SoubraA H, MollonG, et al.. Three-dimensional face stability analysis of pressurized tunnels driven in a multilayered purely frictional medium [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2015, 49: 18-34

[25]

SenentS, YiC, JimenezR. An upper bound solution for tunnel face stability analysis considering the free span [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 103: 103515-103528

[26]

LiZ W, YangX L, LiT Z. Face stability analysis of tunnels under steady unsaturated seepage conditions [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 93: 103095

[27]

HanK H, ZhangC P, ZhangD L. Upper-bound solutions for the face stability of a shield tunnel in multilayered cohesive-frictional soils [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2016, 791-9

[28]

ChengW C, SongZ P, TianW, et al.. Shield tunnel uplift and deformation characterisation: A case study from Zhengzhou metro [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 79: 83-95

[29]

ZhangJ H, WangW J, ZhangD B, et al.. Safe range of retaining pressure for three-dimensional face of pressurized tunnels based on limit analysis and reliability method [J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2018, 22(11): 4645-4656

[30]

ZhangD B, SunW C, WangC Y, et al.. Reliability analysis of seismic stability of shield tunnel face under multiple correlated failure modes [J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2021, 25(8): 3172-3185

[31]

ZhangJ, ZhangB. Reliability analysis for seismic stability of tunnel faces in soft rock masses based on a 3D stochastic collapse model [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2019, 26(7): 1706-1718

[32]

ZhangJ H, ZhangL Y, WangW J, et al.. Probabilistic analysis of three-dimensional tunnel face stability in soft rock masses using Hoek-Brown failure criterion [J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2020, 44(11): 1601-1616

[33]

ZhangD B, ZhangB. Stability analysis of the pressurized 3D tunnel face in anisotropic and nonhomogeneous soils [J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2020, 20(4): 04020018

[34]

SenentS, MollonG, JimenzeR. Tunnel face stability in heavily fractured rock masses that follow the Hoek-Brown failure criterion [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2013, 60440-451

[35]

HoekE. Reliability of Hoek-Brown estimates of rock mass properties and their impact on design [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 1998, 35(1): 63-68

[36]

MollonG, DiasD, SoubraA H. Range of the safe retaining pressures of a pressurized tunnel face by a probabilistic approach [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2013, 139(11): 1954-1967

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

137

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/