Analytical procedure for massive water-sealing barriers used in deep excavations considering seepage effect and its application

Cheng-yong Cao , Cheng-hua Shi

Journal of Central South University ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6) : 2033 -2048.

PDF
Journal of Central South University ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6) : 2033 -2048. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-022-5062-1
Article

Analytical procedure for massive water-sealing barriers used in deep excavations considering seepage effect and its application

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

This paper presents an analytical procedure for massive water-sealing barriers (MWSBs) that are made of partially overlapped jet-grouting columns used for deep excavations, in which two crucial factors of the permeability and strength of jet-grouted materials are considered. Subsequently, a calculation example is analyzed and discussed. Results show that “tension failure” mechanism is a major concern for the structural failure during a design of MWSBs. The maximum allowable seepage discharge is a crucial index for the design of MWSBs, which has a significant influence on determining the design parameters of MWSBs. Compared with the design procedure for MWSBs that is proposed in this paper, the design parameters of MWSBs determined by the stability equilibrium and seepage stability equilibrium approaches are conservative due to the fact that it fails to consider the permeability or strength of jet-grouted materials that makes a contribution to the structural safety. Based on the proposed design method, the ranges of both the thickness and depth of MWSBs for a case history of subway excavation in Fuzhou, China were determined. Finally, field pumping test results showed that the water-tightness performance of MWSBs performed at site was quite well.

Keywords

rectangular excavations / deep aquifers / massive water-sealing barriers / seepage / design procedure

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Cheng-yong Cao, Cheng-hua Shi. Analytical procedure for massive water-sealing barriers used in deep excavations considering seepage effect and its application. Journal of Central South University, 2022, 29(6): 2033-2048 DOI:10.1007/s11771-022-5062-1

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

ChenH-H, LiJ-P, LiL. Performance of a zoned excavation by bottom-up technique in Shanghai soft soils [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2018, 144(11): 05018003

[2]

ElbazK, ShenS-L, TanY, et al.. Investigation into performance of deep excavation in sand covered Karst: A case report [J]. Soils and Foundations, 2018, 5841042-1058

[3]

MengF-Y, ChenR-P, WuH-N, et al.. Observed behaviors of a long and deep excavation and collinear underlying tunnels in Shenzhen granite residual soil [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 103: 103504

[4]

CAO Cheng-yong, SHI Cheng-hua, LIU Ling-hui, et al. Novel excavation and construction method for a deep shaft excavation in ultrathick aquifers [J]. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2019: 1827479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1827479.

[5]

LiuJ-W, ShiC-H, CaoC-Y, et al.. Improved analytical method for pile response due to foundation pit excavation [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2020, 123103609

[6]

ZhengG, CaoJ R, ChengX S, et al.. Experimental study on the artificial recharge of semiconfined aquifers involved in deep excavation engineering [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2018, 557868-877

[7]

ZhangW G, GohA T C, GohK H, et al.. Performance of braced excavation in residual soil with groundwater drawdown [J]. Underground Space, 2018, 3(2): 150-165

[8]

XuY-S, ShenJ S, ZhouA-N, et al.. Geological and hydrogeological environment with geohazards during underground construction in Hangzhou: A review [J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2018, 11(18): 1-18

[9]

ZhengG, ZengC-F, DiaoY, et al.. Test and numerical research on wall deflections induced by pre-excavation dewatering [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2014, 62: 244-256

[10]

ShiC-H, CaoC-Y, LeiM-F, et al.. Optimal design and dynamic control of construction dewatering with the consideration of dewatering process [J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2017, 21(4): 1161-1169

[11]

LiuL-H, LeiM-F, CaoC-Y, et al.. Dewatering characteristics and inflow prediction of deep foundation pits with partial penetrating curtains in sand and gravel strata [J]. Water, 2019, 11(10): 2182

[12]

WuY-X, LyuH-M, ShenJ S, et al.. Geological and hydrogeological environment in Tianjin with potential geohazards and groundwater control during excavation [J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2018, 77101-17

[13]

WuY-X, LyuH-M, HanJ, et al.. Dewatering-induced building settlement around a deep excavation in soft deposit in Tianjin, China [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2019, 145(5): 05019003

[14]

LiuX-X, ShenS-L, XuY-S, et al.. Analytical approach for time-dependent groundwater inflow into shield tunnel face in confined aquifer [J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2018, 424655-673

[15]

ShiC-H, CaoC-Y, LeiM-F, et al.. Effects of lateral unloading on the mechanical and deformation performance of shield tunnel segment joints [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 51: 175-188

[16]

LiuJ-W, ShiC-H, LeiM-F, et al.. Improved analytical method for evaluating the responses of a shield tunnel to adjacent excavations and its application [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 98: 103339

[17]

WuY-X, LyuH-M, ShenS-L, et al.. A three-dimensional fluid-solid coupled numerical modeling of the barrier leakage below the excavation surface due to dewatering [J]. Hydrogeology Journal, 2020, 28(4): 1449-1463

[18]

ZengC-F, ZhengG, XueX-L. Responses of deep soil layers to combined recharge in a leaky aquifer [J]. Engineering Geology, 2019, 260105263

[19]

ZengC-F, SongW-W, XueX-L, et al.. Construction dewatering in a metro station incorporating buttress retaining wall to limit ground settlement: Insights from experimental modelling [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2021, 116104124

[20]

ZengC-F, ZhengG, XueX-L, et al.. Combined recharge: A method to prevent ground settlement induced by redevelopment of recharge wells [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2019, 5681-11

[21]

WuY-X, ZhengQ, ZhouA-N, et al.. Numerical evaluation of the ground response induced by dewatering in a multi-aquifer system [J]. Geoscience Frontiers, 2021, 12(5): 101209

[22]

WuY-X, ShenJ S, ChengW C, et al.. Semi-analytical solution to pumping test data with barrier, wellbore storage, and partial penetration effects [J]. Engineering Geology, 2017, 226: 44-51

[23]

ZengC-F, ZhengG, ZhouX-F, et al.. Behaviours of wall and soil during pre-excavation dewatering under different foundation pit widths [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2019, 115103169

[24]

ZengC-F, XueX-L, LiM-K. Use of cross wall to restrict enclosure movement during dewatering inside a metro pit before soil excavation [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2021, 112103909

[25]

PujadesE, Vàzquez-SuñéE, CarreraJ, et al.. Dewatering of a deep excavation undertaken in a layered soil [J]. Engineering Geology, 2014, 17815-27

[26]

ShenS-L, WuY-X, MisraA. Calculation of head difference at two sides of a cut-off barrier during excavation dewatering [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2017, 91: 192-202

[27]

PujadesE, CarreraJ, Vázquez-SuñéE, et al.. Hydraulic characterization of diaphragm walls for cut and cover tunnelling [J]. Engineering Geology, 2012, 125: 1-10

[28]

XuY-S, ShenS-L, MaL, et al.. Evaluation of the blocking effect of retaining walls on groundwater seepage in aquifers with different insertion depths [J]. Engineering Geology, 2014, 183: 254-264

[29]

XuY-S, YanX-X, ShenS-L, et al.. Experimental investigation on the blocking of groundwater seepage from a waterproof curtain during pumped dewatering in an excavation [J]. Hydrogeology Journal, 2019, 27(7): 2659-2672

[30]

WangJ-X, LiuX-T, WuY-B, et al.. Field experiment and numerical simulation of coupling non-Darcy flow caused by curtain and pumping well in foundation pit dewatering [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2017, 549: 277-293

[31]

WangJ-X, LiuX-T, LiuS-L, et al.. Physical model test of transparent soil on coupling effect of cut-off wall and pumping wells during foundation pit dewatering [J]. Acta Geotechnica, 2019, 14(1): 141-162

[32]

VilarrasaV, CarreraJ, JuradoA, et al.. A methodology for characterizing the hydraulic effectiveness of an annular low-permeability barrier [J]. Engineering Geology, 2011, 120(1–4): 68-80

[33]

PujadesE, LópezA, CarreraJ, et al.. Barrier effect of underground structures on aquifers [J]. Engineering Geology, 2012, 145–146: 41-49

[34]

WuY-X, ShenS-L, YuanD-J. Characteristics of dewatering induced drawdown curve under blocking effect of retaining wall in aquifer [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2016, 539: 554-566

[35]

ZengC-F, XueX-L, ZhengG, et al.. Responses of retaining wall and surrounding ground to pre-excavation dewatering in an alternated multi-aquifer-aquitard system [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2018, 559: 609-626

[36]

LyuH-M, ShenS-L, WuY-X, et al.. Calculation of groundwater head distribution with a close barrier during excavation dewatering in confined aquifer [J]. Geoscience Frontiers, 2021, 12(2): 791-803

[37]

CaoC-Y, ShiC-H, LiuL-H, et al.. Evaluation of the effectiveness of an alternative to control groundwater inflow during a deep excavation into confined aquifers [J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2020, 79(22): 1-13

[38]

PujadesE, JuradoA, CarreraJ, et al.. Hydrogeological assessment of non-linear underground enclosures [J]. Engineering Geology, 2016, 207: 91-102

[39]

CaoC-Y, ShiC-H, LeiM-F. A simplified approach to design jet-grouted bottom sealing barriers for deep excavations in deep aquifers [J]. Applied Sciences, 2019, 9112307

[40]

TimoshenkoS P, GoodierJ NTheory of elasticity [M], 19703rd EditionCalifornia, McGraw Hill Book Company

[41]

VerruijtATheory of Groundwater Flow [M], 1982, London, Macmillan Education

[42]

KarlTTheoretical soil mechanics [M], 1943, Hoboken, NJ, USA, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

[43]

CroceP, FloraA, ModoniGJet grouting: Technology, design and control [M], 2014, New York, CRC Press

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

164

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/