Investigation on aerodynamic noise reduction for snow-plough of high-speed train

Xiao-ming Tan , Zhi-gang Yang

Journal of Central South University ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5) : 1735 -1748.

PDF
Journal of Central South University ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5) : 1735 -1748. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-022-4922-z
Article

Investigation on aerodynamic noise reduction for snow-plough of high-speed train

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

A set of acoustic optimization design methods is established by combining the flow field deterioration theory and the acoustic analogy theory, and applied to the acoustic optimization design of high-speed train snow-plough. The results show that the streamline bodies of the head/tail car are the most important sound sources, respectively, accounting for 23.7% and 33.7% of the total sound energy. Compared with the streamline body of tail head, the streamline body of head car is more biased towards high frequency for the sound source energy. The A-weighted radiated noise of the train body is characterized by broadband sound (mainly in the range of 1–4 kHz) and peak features (especially at 2 kHz). The snow-plough with the maximum expansion length can mitigate the strong peak effect of the sound at 2 kHz, reduce the total sound energy, and show the best acoustic radiation performance in the four schemes. The numerical computation model was checked by the wind tunnel test results.

Keywords

high-speed train / snow-plough / aero-acoustic optimized design / expansion length

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xiao-ming Tan, Zhi-gang Yang. Investigation on aerodynamic noise reduction for snow-plough of high-speed train. Journal of Central South University, 2022, 29(5): 1735-1748 DOI:10.1007/s11771-022-4922-z

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

LiangX, LiuH, DongT, et al.. Aerodynamic noise characteristics of high-speed train foremost Bogie section [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2020, 27(6): 1802-1813

[2]

KimH, HuZ, ThompsonD. Numerical investigation of the effect of cavity flow on high speed train pantograph aerodynamic noise [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2020, 201: 104159

[3]

YaoY, SunZ, YangG, et al.. Analysis of aerodynamic noise characteristics of high-speed train pantograph with different installation bases [J]. Applied Sciences, 2019, 9(11): 2332

[4]

MaW, BaoH, ZhangC, et al.. Beamforming of phased microphone array for rotating sound source localization [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2020, 467115064

[5]

LuY, YangK, DuanR. A simple method for depth estimation of a sound source at known range in the deep sea [J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2019, 14664097-4107

[6]

LauterbachA, EhrenfriedK, LooseS, et al.. Microphone array wind tunnel measurements of Reynolds number effects in high-speed train aeroacoustics [J]. International Journal of Aeroacoustics, 2012, 11(34): 411-446

[7]

KuritaT, HaraM, YamadaH, et al.. Reduction of pantograph noise of high-speed trains [J]. Journal of Mechanical systems for Transportation and Logistics, 2010, 3(1): 63-74

[8]

LatorreI E, ThompsonD J, SmithM, et al.. Anechoic wind tunnel tests on high-speed train bogie aerodynamic noise [J]. International Journal of Rail Transportation, 2017, 5(2): 87-109

[9]

DengY, XiaoX, HeB, et al.. Analysis of external noise spectrum of high-speed railway [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21(12): 4753-4761

[10]

TanX, YangZ, WuX, et al.. Experimental research on frequency spectrum component model of noise source outside the CIT500 train [J]. Journal of the China Rail Way Society, 2017, 39(7): 32-37(in Chinese)

[11]

IkedaM, MitsumojiT. Evaluation method of low-frequency aeroacoustic noise source structure generated by Shinkansen pantograph [J]. Quarterly Report of RTRI, 2008, 49(3): 184-190

[12]

IkedaM, MitsumojiT, IkedaM, et al.. Numerical estimation of aerodynamic interference between panhead and articulated frame [J]. Quarterly Report of RTRI, 2009, 50(4): 227-232

[13]

LeeS A, KangH M, LeeY B, et al.. The aero-acoustic analysis for each part of double arm pantograph of high speed train [J]. Journal of computational fluids engineering, 2015, 20(2): 61-66

[14]

TanX, WangT, QianB, et al.. Aerodynamic noise simulation and quadrupole noise problem of 600 km/h high-speed train [J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7124866-124875

[15]

MinelliG, YaoH D, AnderssonN, et al.. An aeroacoustic study of the flow surrounding the front of a simplified ICE3 high-speed train model [J]. Applied Acoustics, 2020, 160: 107-125

[16]

YuH H, LiJ C, ZhangH Q. On aerodynamic noises radiated by the pantograph system of high-speed trains [J]. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2013, 29(3): 399-410

[17]

ZhuJ, HuZ, ThompsonD J. Flow behaviour and aeroacoustic characteristics of a simplified high-speed train bogie [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2016, 230(7): 1642-1658

[18]

YangY, YangGA numerical study on aerodynamic noise sources of high-speed train [C], 2012, Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, 107116

[19]

XiongX, LiA, LiangX, et al.. Field study on high-speed train induced fluctuating pressure on a bridge noise barrier [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2018, 177: 157-166

[20]

LuM, LiQ, NingZ, et al.. Study on the aerodynamic load characteristic of noise reduction barrier on high-speed railway [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2018, 176: 254-262

[21]

TAN X M, XIE P P, YANG Z G, et al. Adaptability of turbulence models for pantograph aerodynamic noise simulation [J]. Shock and Vibration, 2019: 6405809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6405809.

[22]

DiM L, JonesW P. LES of turbulent flow past a swept fence [J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2003, 24(4): 606-615

[23]

VasilyevO V, LundT S, MoinP. A general class of commutative filters for LES in complex geometries [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2001, 146(1): 82-104

[24]

WangM, FreundJ B, LeleS K. Computational prediction of flow-generated sound [J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2005, 38(1): 483-512

[25]

CurleN. The influence of solid boundaries upon aerodynamic sound [J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1955, 231(1187): 505-514

[26]

TanX M, YangZ G, TanX X, et al.. Vortex structures and aeroacoustic performance of the flow field of the pantograph [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2018, 432: 17-32

[27]

TAN X M, LIU H F, YANG Z G, et al. Characteristics and mechanism analysis of aerodynamic noise sources for highspeed trains in the tunnel [J]. Complexity, 2018: 5858415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5858415.

[28]

GaoY, WangY, WangJ, et al.. Testing study of aerodynamic noise for high speed train model in aero-acoustic wind tunnel [J]. Technical Acoustics, 2013, 32: 506-510(in Chinese)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

143

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/