Liquid spreading behavior and surface wettability of copper ore under controlled sulfuric acid solution and surfactants

Chun-ming Ai , Ping-ping Sun , Ai-xiang Wu , Xun Chen , Chao Liu

Journal of Central South University ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2) : 433 -442.

PDF
Journal of Central South University ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2) : 433 -442. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-022-4894-z
Article

Liquid spreading behavior and surface wettability of copper ore under controlled sulfuric acid solution and surfactants

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

To reveal the potential effect of surfactant on improving surface wettability of copper ore, the droplet spreading behavior of sulfuric acid solution contained surfactant was visualized using high-speed camera and an image processing method, and the solid-liquid interaction was discussed in this study. The results show that liquid surface tension and ore surface roughness are the main factors affecting surface wettability. The effect of sulfuric acid solution concentration and surfactants on the surface wettability of ore is revealed via quantitative spreading area, spreading coefficient, and contact angle. The results of droplet spreading experiment show that the higher concentration of surfactant and sulfuric acid solution result in improving the wettability of ore, spreading coefficient, and decreasing contact angle. The “leaching reaction coefficient” and “surface activity coefficient” are introduced to modify the mathematical expression of the equilibrium contact angle.

Keywords

surfactant / wetting / spreading / contact angle

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Chun-ming Ai, Ping-ping Sun, Ai-xiang Wu, Xun Chen, Chao Liu. Liquid spreading behavior and surface wettability of copper ore under controlled sulfuric acid solution and surfactants. Journal of Central South University, 2022, 29(2): 433-442 DOI:10.1007/s11771-022-4894-z

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

NosratiA, Addai-MensahJ, RobinsonD J. Drum agglomeration behavior of nickel laterite ore: Effect of process variables [J]. Hydrometallurgy, 2012, 125–126: 90-99

[2]

WuA-X, WangH-J, YangB-H, et al.. Progress and prospect of solution leaching mining technology [J]. Mining Technology, 2006, 6(3): 39-48

[3]

AiC-M, SunP-P, WuA-X, et al.. Accelerating leaching of copper ore with surfactant and the analysis of reaction kinetics [J]. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy, and Materials, 2019, 26(3): 274-281

[4]

CarlesiC, CortesE, DibernardiG, et al.. Ionic liquids as additives for acid leaching of copper from sulfidic ores [J]. Hydrometallurgy, 2016, 161: 29-33

[5]

FerdowsiA, YoozbashizadehH. Process optimization and kinetics for leaching of cerium, lanthanum and neodymium elements from iron ore waste’s apatite by nitric acid [J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2017, 27(2): 420-428

[6]

FathollahzadehH, BeckerT, EksteenJ J, et al.. Microbial contact enhances bioleaching of rare earth elements [J]. Bioresource Technology Reports, 2018, 3: 102-108

[7]

LiaoY-L, ZhouJ, HuangF-R, et al.. Leaching kinetics of calcification roasting calcinate from multimetallic sulfide copper concentrate containing high content of lead and iron [J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2015, 149: 190-196

[8]

CopurM, KizilcaM, KocakerimM M. Determination of the optimum conditions for copper leaching from chalcopyrite concentrate ore using Taguchi method [J]. Chemical Engineering Communications, 2015, 202(7): 927-935

[9]

YaoG-H, YanJ-L, WangH-J, et al.. Study on heated agitation leaching of copper oxide ore with high mudcontent[J]. SciencepaperOnline, 2010, 5(11): 855-860(in Chinese)

[10]

JiangY. Study on leaching test of copper-cobalt rejects in DRC [J]. Non-Ferrous Mining and Metallurgy, 2016, 32(6): 29-33(in Chinese)

[11]

LiuJ-Z, MiaoX-X, YangB-H, et al.. Copper leaching test and its influencing factors analysis [J]. Mining and Metallurgical Engineering, 2013, 33(5): 95-97(in Chinese)

[12]

AiC-M, WuA-X, WangY-M, et al.. Contact style and influence factors of solid-liquid in ore leaching [J]. Hydrometallurgy of China, 2012, 31(6): 348-352(in Chinese)

[13]

ShabaniM A, IrannajadM, MeshkiniM, et al.. Investigations on bioleaching of copper and zinc oxide ores [J]. Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals, 2019, 72(3): 609-611

[14]

AiC-M, WuA-X, WangY-M, et al.. Optimization and mechanism of surfactant accelerating leaching test [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2016, 23(5): 1032-1039

[15]

MotamediM, Tehrani-BaghaA R, MahdavianM. Effect of aging time on corrosion inhibition of cationic surfactant on mild steel in sulfamic acid cleaning solution [J]. Corrosion Science, 2013, 70: 46-54

[16]

HuS-S, ZhouZ-H, ZhangL, et al.. Adsorption behaviors of novel betaines on the wettability of the quartz surface [J]. Soft Matter, 2015, 11(40): 7960-7968

[17]

ChenF-B, XuB, JiaoH-Z, et al.. Triaxial mechanical properties and microstructure visualization of BFRC [J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 278: 122275

[18]

IglesiasJ E, PinheiroL S, WeibelD E, et al.. Influence of surfactants addition on the properties of calcium hypochlorite solutions [J]. Journal of Applied Oral Science, 2019, 27e20180157

[19]

AlvarezJ O, SchechterD S. Wettability alteration and spontaneous imbibition in unconventional liquid reservoirs by surfactant additives [J]. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2017, 20(1): 107-117

[20]

WilliamsD L, MittalK L. Wettability techniques to monitor the cleanliness of surfaces [M]. Developments in Surface Contamination and Cleaning, 2016, Amsterdam, Elsevier, 445-476

[21]

BasařováP, SuchanováH, SouskováK, et al.. Bubble adhesion on hydrophobic surfaces in solutions of pure and technical grade ionic surfactants [J]. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2017, 522: 485-493

[22]

NiG-H, LiZ, XieH-C. The mechanism and relief method of the coal seam water blocking effect (WBE) based on the surfactants [J]. Powder Technology, 2018, 323: 60-68

[23]

WuA-X, AiC-M, WangY-M, et al.. Surfactant accelerating leaching of copper ores [J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering, 2013, 35(6): 709-713

[24]

KimI H, KimK H, SonJ S, et al.. Surface roughness effect on the solid equilibrium contact angle [J]. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 2017, 17(6): 4271-4274

[25]

ShanahanM E R, deG P G. Start-up of a reactive droplet [J]. Comptes Rendus De l’Académie Des Sciences-Series IIB-Mechanics-Physics-Chemistry-Astronomy, 1997, 324(4): 261-268

[26]

ZhangD, ZhuD-Y, ZhangT, et al.. Kinetics of reactive wetting of graphite by liquid Al and Cu-Si alloys [J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2015, 25(7): 2473-2480

[27]

RenY-B, ZhouR-S, ZhuD-Y, et al.. The reactive wetting kinetics of interfacial tension: A reaction-limited model [J]. RSC Advances, 2017, 7(21): 13003-13009

[28]

deG P G. The dynamics of reactive wetting on solid surfaces [J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 1998, 249(1–4): 196-205

[29]

YostF G, HoskingF M, FrearD R. Introduction: the mechanics of solder alloy wetting and spreading [M]. The Mechanics of Solder Alloy Wetting and Spreading, 1993, Boston, MA, Springer US, 17

[30]

AttarE, KörnerC. Lattice Boltzmann method for dynamic wetting problems [J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2009, 335(1): 84-93

[31]

DezellusO, HodajF, EustathopoulosN. Chemical reaction-limited spreading: The triple line velocity versus contact angle relation [J]. Acta Materialia, 2002, 50(19): 4741-4753

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

132

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/