Experimental study on bearing capacity of shell strip footings near geotextile-reinforced earth slopes

Abstract

From a financial point of view, urbanization frequently enforces the clients to construct superstructures near the slopes, giving rise to increasing the risk of building instability. By conducting a series of small-scale plate load tests, this work aims to investigate the effects of installing geotextile reinforcement layers in sandy slope and reducing the apex angle of triangular shell strip footings. The results show considerable effect of using geotextile-reinforced layers and decreasing the apex angle on the ultimate bearing capacity of shell foundations. With increasing foundation distance from the slope, the adverse effect of the slope is reduced. However, as the distance decreases, the effect of reinforcement and apex angle is increased. For practical applications, empirical equations are also presented for determining the ultimate bearing capacity of the footings and scale effect as well. Finally, 3D numerical simulations are executed and compared with the experimental results.

Keywords

slope / shell strip footing / geotextile-reinforced / apex angle / ultimate bearing capacity / numerical simulation

References

[1] ChenC F, DongW Z, TangY Z. Seismic ultimate bearing capacity of strip footings on slope [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2007, 14: 730-736

[2] YangX L, WangZ B, ZouJ F, LiL. Bearing capacity of foundation on slope determined by energy dissipation method and model experiments [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2007, 14: 125-128

[3] NaeiniS A, KhademR B, MahmoodiE. Bearing capacity and settlement of strip footing on geosynthetic reinforced clayey slopes [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 19: 1116-1124

[4] LuL, WangZ J, AraiK. Numerical and experimental analyses for bearing capacity of rigid strip footing subjected to eccentric load [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21: 3983-3992

[5] AttarzadehA, GhanbariA, HamidiA. A study of bearing capacity of shallow foundations next to sand slope with experimental models [J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, Kharazmi University, 2015, 9(1): 2695-2710(in Persian)

[6] KurianN P, Jayakrishna DevakiV M. Analytical studies on the geotechnical performance of shell foundations [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2005, 42(2): 562-573

[7] KurianN PShell foundations: Geometry, analysis, design and construction [M], 2006, Harrow, UK, Alpha Science International

[8] YamamotoK, LyaminA V, AbboA J, SloanS W, HiraM. Bearing capacity and failure mechanism of different types of foundations on sand [J]. Soils and Foundations, 2009, 49(2): 305-314

[9] FernandoN, SendanayakeE, SendanayakeD, de SilvaNThe experimental investigation of failure mechanism and bearing capacity of different types of shallow foundations [R], 2011, Sri Lanka, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Moratuwa

[10] KURIAN N P, MOHAN C S. Contact pressures under shell foundations [C]// Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. Stockholm, Sweden, 1981: 165–168.

[11] EsmailiD, HatafN. Experimental and numerical investigation of ultimate load capacity of shell foundation on reinforced and unreinforced sand [J]. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, 2008, 32(5): 491-500

[12] THILAKAN S, NAIK N. Geotechnical behaviour of shell foundations [C]// Proceedings of 50th Indian Geotechnical Conference. Pune, India, 2015: 1–9.

[13] HannaA, Abdel-RahmanM. Ultimate bearing capacity of triangular shell strip footings on sand [J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1990, 116(12): 1851-1863

[14] HannaA, Abdel-RahmanM. Experimental investigation of shell foundations on dry sand [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1998, 35(5): 847-857

[15] ShaligramP S. Behavior of triangular shell strip footing on georeinforced layered sand [J]. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology, 2011, 2(2): 192-196

[16] AzzamW R, NasrA M. Bearing capacity of shell strip footing on reinforced sand [J]. Journal of Advanced Research, 2015, 6(5): 727-737

[17] FattahM Y, WaryoshW A, Al-HamdaniM A E. Investigation on the behavior of conical shell foundations composed of reactive powder concrete embedded on sandy soil [J]. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2015, 18(11): 1859-1873

[18] FattahM Y, WaryoshW A, Al-HamdaniM A E. Experimental and theoretical study on bearing capacity of conical shell foundations composed of reactive powder concrete [J]. Acta Geodynamica et Geomaterialia, 2015, 12(4): 1-16

[19] El SawwafM A. Behavior of strip footing on geogrid-reinforced sand over a soft clay slope [J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2007, 25(1): 50-60

[20] AlamshahiS, HatafN. Bearing capacity of strip footings on sand slopes reinforced with geogrid and grid-anchor [J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2009, 27(3): 217-226

[21] TavakoliM G, GhanbariA, MehdizadehH. Experimental study on the behaviour of geogrid-reinforced slopes with respect to aggregate size [J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2016, 44(6): 862-871

[22] VahidipourA, GhanbariA, HamidiA. Experimental study of dynamic compaction adjacent to a slope [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Ground Improvement, 2016, 169(2): 79-89

[23] JawadF W, FattahM Y. Finite element analysis of the bearing capacity of footings nearby slopes [J]. International Review of Civil Engineering, 2019, 10(1): 1-7

[24] FATTAH M Y, AL-HADDAD S A, HAMEEDI M. Load carrying capacity of rectangular foundation on geogrid reinforced sloped sandy soil [C]// IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering, Fourth International Conference on Buildings, Construction and Environmental Engineering — BCEE4. Istanbul, Turkey, 2019: 1–9.

[25] SeligE T, MckeeK E. Static and dynamic behaviour of small footings [J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, 1961, 87(6): 29-50

[26] ChummerA V. Bearing capacity theory from experimental results [J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 1972, 98(12): 1311-1324

[27] DashS K, BoraM C. Improved performance of soft clay foundations using stone columns and geocell-sand mattress [J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2013, 41: 26-35

[28] ASTM D 4253. Standard test methods for maximum index density and unit weight of soils using a vibratory table [S].

[29] ASTM D 4254. Standard test methods for minimum index density and unit weight of soils and calculation of relative density [S].

[30] FattahM Y, Al-BaghdadiW, OmarM, ShanablehA. Analysis of strip footings resting on reinforced granular trench by the finite element method [J]. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 4(4): 471-482

[31] AltalheaE B, TahaM R, AbdrabboF M. Bearing capacity of strip footing on sand slopes reinforced with geotextiles and soil nails [J]. Jurnal Teknologi, 2013, 65(2): 1-11

[32] ASTM D 2487. Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system) [S].

[33] ColmenaresJ E, KangS R, ShinY J, ShinJ H. Ultimate bearing capacity of conical shell foundation [J]. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 2014, 52(3): 507-523

[34] HuangC C, KangW W. The effects of a setback on the bearing capacity of a surface footing near a slope [J]. Journal of GeoEngineering, 2008, 3(1): 25-32

[35] ShuklaR P, JakkaR S. Critical setback distance for a footing resting on slopes [J]. Acta Geotechnica Slovenica, 2017, 14(2): 19-31

[36] ShuklaR P, JakkaR S. Critical setback distance for a footing resting on slopes under seismic loading [J]. Geomechanics and Engineering, 2018, 15(6): 1193-1205

[37] Abdel-RahmanMGeotechnical behavior of shell foundations [D], 1996, Changsha, Concordia University