Periodic electromagnetic signals as potential precursor for seismic activity

Shan-shan Yong , Xin-an Wang , Xing Zhang , Qin-meng Guo , Jing Wang , Chao Yang , Bing-hui Jiang

Journal of Central South University ›› 2021, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (8) : 2463 -2471.

PDF
Journal of Central South University ›› 2021, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (8) : 2463 -2471. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-021-4739-1
Article

Periodic electromagnetic signals as potential precursor for seismic activity

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Electromagnetic signals may be a promising precursor to seismic activity which has been observed in many case studies in past decades. However, the correlation and causation between the electromagnetic signals and the seismic activity are still unclear without intensive observation network. In order to find seismoelectromagnetic phenomenon, we deployed AETA (acoustic and electromagnetic testing all-in-one system), a high-density multi-component seismic monitoring system in the China Earthquake Science Experiment site (CESE, in Sichuan Province and Yunnan Province, China) and the capital circle (areas with a distance which is ≤200 km from Beijing), to record electromagnetic and geo-acoustic data across 0.1 Hz–10 kHz. In the course of data collection, we discovered an electromagnetic waveform that occurs on a daily basis. Because the signal generally coincides with sunrise and sunset, we named this phenomenon the SRSS (Sunrise-Sunset) waveform. After conducting three statistical tests based on seismicity and SRSS, we determined that the SRSS waveform is roughly correlated with the onset of seismic activity. It generally occurs at the regions where seismicity occurs. This discovery might have significant implications with respect to the future of earthquake prediction.

Keywords

seismic precursor / periodic electromagnetic signal / Sunrise-Sunset (SRSS) waveform

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Shan-shan Yong, Xin-an Wang, Xing Zhang, Qin-meng Guo, Jing Wang, Chao Yang, Bing-hui Jiang. Periodic electromagnetic signals as potential precursor for seismic activity. Journal of Central South University, 2021, 28(8): 2463-2471 DOI:10.1007/s11771-021-4739-1

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

ParsonsT, JiC, KirbyE. Stress changes from the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake and increased hazard in the Sichuan basin [J]. Nature, 2008, 454(7203): 509-510

[2]

YueH, LayT. Inversion of high-rate (1 sps) GPS data for rupture process of the 11 March 2011 Tohoku earthquake (Mw9.1) [J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2011, 38(7): 752-767

[3]

LiR-H, FuZ-Z. Local gravity variations before and after the Tangshan earthquake (M=7.8) and the dilatation process [J]. Tectonophysics, 1983, 97(1–4): 159-169

[4]

HanP, ZhuangJ-C, HattoriK, ChenC H, FebrianiF, ChenH-Y, YoshinoC, YoshidaS. Assessing the potential earthquake precursory information in ULF magnetic data recorded in Kanto, Japan during 2000–2010: Distance and magnitude dependences [J]. Entropy, 2020, 22(8): 859

[5]

QiuZ-C, YongS-S, WangX-N. On possible electromagnetic precursors to a significant earthquake (Mw=7.0) occurred in Jiuzhaigou (China) on 8 August 2017 [C]. Proceedings of the 2020 The 3rd International Conference on Information Science and System, 2020, Cambridge, United Kingdom, New York, NY, USA, ACM, 229-234

[6]

HelmanD S. Seismic electric signals (SES) and earthquakes: A review of an updated VAN method and competing hypotheses for SES generation and earthquake triggering [J]. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 2020, 302: 106484

[7]

FloriosK, ContopoulosI, ChristofilakisV, TatsisG, ChronopoulosS, RepapisC, TritakisV. Pre-seismic electromagnetic perturbations in two earthquakes in northern Greece [J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2020, 177(2): 787-799

[8]

NikolopoulosD P E. Electromagnetic pre-earthquake precursors: Mechanisms, data and models-A review [J]. Journal of Earth Science & Climatic Change, 2015, 6(1): 250

[9]

HayakawaM, HobaraY, OhtaK, HattoriK. The ultra-low-frequency magnetic disturbances associated with earthquakes [J]. Earthquake Science, 2011, 246523-534

[10]

Fraser-SmithA C, BernardiA, McgillP R, LaddM E, HelliwellR A, VillardO GJr. Low-frequency magnetic field measurements near the epicenter of the Ms 7.1 Loma Prieta Earthquake [J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 1990, 17(9): 1465-1468

[11]

PotirakisS M, SchekotovA, AsanoT, HayakawaM. Natural time analysis on the ultra-low frequency magnetic field variations prior to the 2016 Kumamoto (Japan) earthquakes [J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2018, 154419-427

[12]

SurkovV V, MolchanovO A, HayakawaM. Pre-earthquake ULF electromagnetic perturbations as a result of inductive seismomagnetic phenomena during microfracturing [J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 2003, 65(1): 31-46

[13]

HayakawaM, PulinetsS, ParrotM, MolchanovO A. Recent progress in seismo electromagnetics and related phenomena [J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 2006, 31(4–9): 129-131

[14]

ChenH-R, YangD-M, LiQ, ZhuR, JiangC, WangJ-G. Observation and research on seismic precursor information of electromagnetic emissions [J]. Earthquake Research in China, 2008, 24(2): 180-186(in Chinese)

[15]

YamadaI, MasudaK, MizutaniH. Electromagnetic and acoustic emission associated with rock fracture [J]. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 1989, 57(12): 157-168

[16]

ZhuT, ZhouJ-G, WangH-Q. Electromagnetic emissions during dilating fracture of a rock [J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2013, 73: 252-262

[17]

ZhouZ L, LiX B, WanG X. The relation between the frequency of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) induced by rock fracture and attribute parameters of rock masses [J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2009, 52(1): 259-265 in Chinese)

[18]

MaQ Z, FangG Q, LiW, ZhouJ N. Electromagnetic anomalies before the 2013 Lushan M_S7.0 earthquake [J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2013, 35(5): 717-730

[19]

XieT, LiuL, LuJ, LiM, YaoL, WangY L, YuC. Retrospective analysis on electromagnetic anomalies observed by ground fixed station before the 2008 Wenchuan M_S8.0 earthquake [J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2018, 65(7): 1922-1937(in Chinese)

[20]

HattoriK. ULF geomagnetic changes associated with large earthquakes [J]. Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, 2004, 15(3): 329

[21]

LiuJ Y, ChenY I, ChuoY J, TsaiH F. Variations of ionospheric total electron content during the Chi-Chi Earthquake [J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2001, 2871383-1386

[22]

HuangQ-H. One possible generation mechanism of co-seismic electric signals [J]. Proceedings of the Japan Academy Ser B: Physical and Biological Sciences, 2002, 78(7): 173-178

[23]

WangX A, YongS S, XuB X, LiangY W, BaiZ Q, AnH Y, ZhangX, HuangJ P, XieZ, LinK, HeC J, LiQ P. Research and implementation of multi-component seismicmonitoring system AETA [J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturelium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2018, 54: 487-494(in Chinese)

[24]

WangX-A, YongS-S, HuangJ-P, Y-X, ZhangX, LiangY-W. Earthquake prediction research based on data of ETA [J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2019, 55(2): 209-214(in Chinese)

[25]

YongS-S, WangX-A, PangR-T, JinX-R, ZengJ-W, HanC-X, XuB-X. Development of inductive magnetic sensor for Multi-component seismic monitoring system AETA [J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturelium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2018, 54: 495-501(in Chinese)

[26]

HuangJ-P, YongS-S, WangX-A, PangR-T, ZengJ-W. A geo-acoustic sensing probe for seismic monitoring [J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2020, 56(2): 193-198(in Chinese)

[27]

KeY L, LiuY W, ZhangL, LiY, ChenZ, BaoC, LiangH, ChenX F, YaoY. Establishment and analysis of the high-precision hydrogen observation array in China earthquake science experiment site [J]. Earthquake, 2018, 38: 35-48(in Chinese)

[28]

Y-X, WangX-A, HuangJ-P, YongS-S. Research on Jiuzhaigou Ms7.0 earthquake based on earthquake based on AETA electromagnatic disturbance data [J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2019, 55(6): 1007-1013(in Chinese)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

149

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/