Remaining oil distribution in models with different heterogeneities after CO₂ WAG injection: Visual research by nuclear magnetic resonance technique

Abstract

Water alternating gas (WAG) injection is a widely used strategy for enhancing oil recovery (EOR) during gas flooding, and the mechanisms, operating parameters, and influencing factors of which have been extensively studied. However, with respect to its capacity in expanding macroscopic sweep volume under varying heterogeneities, the related results appear inadequate. In this research, three cores with different heterogeneities were used and flooded by the joint water and CO₂ WAG, then the effects of heterogeneity on oil recovery were determined. More importantly, the cores after CO₂ WAG injection were investigated using the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) technique for remaining oil distribution research, which could help us to understand the capacity of CO₂ WAG in enlarging sweep volume at different heterogeneities. The results show that the presence of heterogeneity may largely weaken the effectiveness of water flooding, the more severe the heterogeneity, the worse the water flooding. The WAG injection of CO₂ performs well in EOR after water flooding for all the cores with different heterogeneities; however, it could barely form a complete or full sweep throughout the low-permeability region, and un-swept bypassed regions remain. The homogeneous core is better developed by the injection of the joint water and CO₂ WAG than the heterogeneous and fractured cases.

Keywords

heterogeneous reservoir / enhancing oil recovery / CO₂ WAG injection / sweep volume / remaining oil / nuclear magnetic resonance

References

[1] HolmL W, JosendalV A. Mechanisms of oil displacement by carbon dioxide [J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1974, 26(12): 1427-1438

[2] DingM-c, WangY-f, WangW, ZhaoH-l, LiuD-x, GaoM. Potential to enhance CO₂ flooding in low permeability reservoirs by alcohol and surfactant as co-solvents [J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2019, 182: 106305

[3] HolmL W. Status of CO₂ and hydrocarbon miscible oil recovery methods [J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1976, 28(1): 76-84

[4] LiZ-y, GuY-an. Soaking efffect on miscible CO₂ flooding in a tight sandstone formation [J]. Fuel, 2014, 134659-668

[5] HINDERAKER L, UTSETH R H, HUSTAD O S, KVANVIK B A, PAULSEN J E. RUTH-A comprehensive Norwegian R&D program on IOR [C]// SPE European Petroleum Conference. Milan, Italy, 1996: SPE 36844. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/36844-MS.

[6] GaoY-c, ZhaoM-f, WangJ-b, ZongC. Performance and gas breakthrough during CO₂ immiscible flooding in ultra-low permeability reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(1): 88-95 in Chinese)

[7] DingM-c, YuanF-q, WangY-f, XiaX-r, ChenW-h, LiuD-xin. Oil recovery from a CO₂ injection in heterogeneous reservoirs: The influence of permeability heterogeneity, CO₂-oil miscibility and injection pattern [J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2017, 44: 140-149

[8] Al-BayatiD, SaeediA, MyersM, WhiteC, XieQ, ClennellB. Insight investigation of miscible SCCO₂ Water Alternating Gas (WAG) injection performance in heterogeneous sandstone reservoirs [J]. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 2018, 28: 255-263

[9] DingM-c, WangY-f, HanY-g, GaoM, WangR-zhuo. Interactions in bypassed oil-CO₂ systems and their utilization in enhancing the recovery of bypassed oil [J]. Fuel, 2019, 237: 1068-1078

[10] CHRISTENSEN J R, STENBY E H, SKAUGE A. Review of the WAG field experience [C]// 1998 SPE International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition. Villahermosa, Mexico, 1998: SPE 71203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/39883-MS.

[11] QinZ, ArshadiM, PiriM. Micro-scale experimental investigations of multiphase flow in oil-wet carbonates. II. Tertiary gas injection and WAG [J]. Fuel, 2019, 257: 116012

[12] PandaM, AmbroseJ G, BeuhlerG, McgguireP L. Optimized EOR design for the eileen west end area, greater prudhoe bay [J]. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2009, 12(1): 25-32

[13] AfzaliS, GhamartaleA, RezaeiN, ZendehboudiS. Mathematical modeling and simulation of water-alternating-gas (WAG) process by incorporating capillary pressure and hysteresis effects [J]. Fuel, 2020, 263116362

[14] ZEKRI A Y, NASR M S, ALSHOBA KYH A S. Evaluation of oil recovery by water alternating gas (WAG) injection oil-wet and water-wet systems [C]// SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Conference. Kuala, Malaysia, 2011: SPE 143438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/143438-MS.

[15] DONG M, FORAIE J, HUANG S, CHATZIS I. Analysis of immiscible water-alternating-gas (WAG) injection using micromodel [C]// Petroleum Society’s Canadian International Petroleum Conference. Calgary, Canada, 2002: Paper 2002–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/2002-158.

[16] KulkarniM M, RaoD N. Experimental investigation of miscible and immiscible water-alternating-gas (WAG) process performance [J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2005, 481-20

[17] MIRKALAEI S M M, HOSSEINI S J, MASOUDI R, ATAEI A, DEMIRAL B M R, KARKOOTI H. Investigation of different I-WAG schemes toward optimization of displacement efficiency [C]// SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Conference. Kuala, Malaysia, 2011: SPE 144891. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/144891-MS.

[18] ZHANG Y P, SAYEGH S, HUGNG S. Enhanced heavy oil recovery by immiscible WAG injection [C]// Petroleum Society’s 7th Canadian International Petroleum Conference. Calgary, Canada, 2006: Paper 2001-014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/2006-014.

[19] AfzaliS, RezaeiN, ZendehboudiS. A comprehensive review on enhanced oil recovery by water alternating gas (WAG) injection [J]. Fuel, 2018, 227: 218-246

[20] HuangE, HolmL. Effect of WAG injection and rock wettability on oil recovery during CO₂ flooding [J]. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 1988, 3(1): 119-129

[21] ChenS, LiH, YangD, TontiwachwuthikulP. Optimal parametric design for water alternating-gas (WAG) process in a CO₂-miscible flooding reservoir [J]. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 2010, 49(10): 75-82

[22] KhanM Y, MandalA. Analytical model for gravity segregation in WAG displacement recovery of inclined stratified reservoirs [J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, 186: 106722

[23] VALEEV A, SHEVELEV A. Design of WAG parameters [C]// SPE Russian Petroleum Technology Conference. Moscow, Russia, 2017: SPE-187843-MS. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/187843-MS.

[24] YangB, KangY-l, LuX-f, YouL-j, ZhangH, ChenZ-xin. Experimental investigation of the pore shape factor in fluid imbibition model-taking the Longmaxi shale in Sichuan Basin as examples [J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, 193107327

[25] BenaventeD, LockP, CuraM, GarciaD, OrdonezS. Predicting the capillary imbibition of porous rocks from microstructure [J]. Transport in Porous Media, 2002, 49(1): 59-76

[26] CROGH N A, EIDE K, MORTERUD S E. WAG injection at the statfjord field, a success story [C]// SPE 13th European Petroleum Conference. Aberdeen, UK, 2002: SPE 78348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/78348-MS.

[27] DingM-c, WangY-f, WangY, GaoM, LiuD-x, ChenW-H. Experimental investigation of bypassed-oil recovery via CO₂ soaking and huff and puff injection: Effects of miscibility and bypassed-oil size [J]. Fuel, 2019, 248152-160

[28] CaiJ-c, LiC-x, SongK-p, ZouS-m, YangZ-m, ShenY-h, MengQ-b, LiuY. The influence of salinity and mineral components on spontaneous imbibition in tight sandstone [J]. Fuel, 2020, 269: 117087

[29] KhosraviM, BahramianA, EmadiM, RostamiB, RoayaieE. Mechanistic investigation of bypassed-oil recovery during CO₂ injection in matrix and fracture [J]. Fuel, 2014, 11743-49

[30] GuoJ-c, LiM, ChenC, TaoL, LiuZ, ZhouD-sheng. Experimental investigation of spontaneous imbibition in tight sandstone reservoirs [J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, 193: 107395

[31] YangZ-p, GaoS-s, YueX-a, LuY-g, SuiH-g, WeiH-guang. New method for plugging channeling in oil field by nitrogen foam [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21(2): 677-683

[32] FernøM A, SteinsbøM, EideØ, AhmedA, AhmedK, GraueA. Parametric study of oil recovery during CO2 injections in fractured chalk: Influence of fracture permeability, diffusion length and water saturation [J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2015, 271063-1073

[33] AbdurrahmanM, HidayatF, HusnaU Z, ArsadA. Determination of optimum CO₂ water alternating gas (CO₂-WAG) ratio in Sumatera Light Oilfield [J]. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2021, 39: 970-974

[34] KhanM Y, MandalA. Analytical model for gravity segregation in WAG displacement recovery of inclined stratified reservoirs [J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, 186106722

[35] WangG, PickupG, SorbieK, MackayE, SkaugeA. Numerical study of CO₂ injection and the role of viscous crossflow in near-miscible CO₂-WAG [J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2020, 74103112

[36] GROENENBOOM J, KECHUT N I, MAR-OR A. Foam-assisted WAG: Injection strategies to optimize performance [C]// SPE/IATMI Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition. Jakarta, Indonesia, 2017: SPE-186991-MS. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/186991-MS.