Horizontal trap-door investigation on face failure zone of shield tunneling in sands

Abstract

A novel horizontal trap-door test system was devised in this study to analyze the face stability of shield tunnels in sands. The test system can be used to investigate both the longitudinal and cross sections of the face failure simultaneously at one single apparatus and was employed to perform face stability tests on small-scaled tunnel models at single gravity. The lateral support pressures and failure zones were studied with varying sand materials and earth covers. The results demonstrate that the tunnel face moves back, the lateral active earth pressure on the tunnel face decreases rapidly to a residual value, and the lateral pressure distribution can be categorized into three stages during the failure process: 1) initial state; 2) pressure dissipation stage; and 3) pressure zone diminution stage. Furthermore, face failure firstly develops from a stable condition to the local failure state, and then continues to develop to the global failure state that can be divided into two sub-zones with different failure mechanisms: rotational failure zone (lower zone) and gravitational failure zone (upper zone). Further discussion shows that under the effects of soil arching, the shape of the gravitational failure zone can adopt arch shaped (most frequent) and column shaped (in shallow tunnels). Limit support pressure for face stability usually appears at δ/D=0.2%–0.5% (ratio of face displacement to tunnel diameter).

Keywords

face stability / trap-door test / lateral earth pressure / failure zone / soil arching / sand

References

[1] BroereW. On the face support of microtunnelling TBMs [J]. Tunn Undergr Space Technol, 2015, 46: 12-17

[2] Ita-AitesW G. Settlements induced by tunneling in soft ground [J]. Tunn Undergr Space Technol, 2007, 22(2): 119-149

[3] BroereW, FestaD. Correlation between the kinematics of a tunnel boring machine and the observed soil displacements [J]. Tunn Undergr Space Technol, 2017, 70: 125-147

[4] HORN N. Horizontal earth pressure on the vertical surfaces of the tunnel tubes [C]//National Conference of Hungarian Civil Engineer Industry. Budapest, 1961: 1–16. (in German)

[5] AnagnostouG, KovariK. Face stability conditions with earth-pressure-balanced shields [J]. Tunn Undergr Space Technol, 1996, 11(2): 165-173

[6] BROERE W Tunnel face stability & new CPT applications [D]. Delft: Delft University of Technology, 2001.

[7] PerazzelliP, AnagnostouG. Stress analysis of reinforced tunnel faces and comparison with the limit equilibrium method [J]. Tunn Undergr Space Technol, 2013, 38: 87-98

[8] PerazzelliP, LeoneT, AnagnostouG. Tunnel face stability under seepage flow conditions [J]. Tunn Undergr Space Technol, 2014, 43: 459-469

[9] AnagnostouG, PerazzelliP. Analysis method and design charts for bolt reinforcement of the tunnel face in cohesive-frictional soils [J]. Tunn Undergr Space Technol, 2015, 47: 162-181

[10] LU X, ZHOU Y, HUANG M, LI F. Computation of the minimum limit support pressure for the shield tunnel face stability under seepage condition [J]. Int J Civ Eng, 2016, 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-016-0116-0.

[11] LiuX Y, WangF M, FangH Y, YuanD J. Dual-failure-mechanism model for face stability analysis of shield tunneling in sands [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 85: 196-208

[12] DavisE H, GunnM J, MairR J, SeneviratineH N. The stability of shallow tunnels and underground openings in cohesive material [J]. Geotechnique, 1980, 30(4): 397-416

[13] LecaE, DormieuxL. Upper and lower bound solutions for the face stability of shallow circular tunnels in frictional material [J]. Geotechnique, 1990, 40(4): 581-606

[14] TangX W, LiuW, AlbersB, SavidisS. Upper bound analysis of tunnel face stability in layered soils [J]. Acta Geotech, 2014, 9(4): 661-671

[15] ZhangC, HanK, ZhangD. Face stability analysis of shallow circular tunnels in cohesive-frictional soils [J]. Tunn Undergr Space Technol, 2015, 50: 345-357

[16] HanK, ZhangC, ZhangD. Upper-bound solutions for the face stability of a shield tunnel in multilayered cohesive-frictional soils [J]. Comput Geotech, 2016, 79: 1-9

[17] KhezriN, MohamadH, FatahiB. Stability assessment of tunnel face in a layered soil using upper bound theorem of limit analysis [J]. Geomech Eng, 2016, 11(4): 471-492

[18] HAN K H, ZHANG C P, LI W, GUO C X. Face stability analysis of shield tunnels in homogeneous soil overlaid by multilayered cohesive-frictional soils [J]. Math Probl Eng, 2016: Article ID 1378274, 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1378274.

[19] AnagnostouG, KovariK. Face stability conditions with earth-pressure-balanced shields [J]. Tunn Undergr Space Technol, 1996, 11(2): 165-173

[20] TerzaghiKTheoretical soil mechanics [M], 1943, New York, Wiley

[21] MollonG, DiasD, SoubraA H. Rotational failure mechanisms for the face stability analysis of tunnels driven by a pressurized shield [J]. Int J Numer Anal Met, 2011, 35(12): 1363-1388

[22] KirschA. Experimental investigation of the face stability of shallow tunnels in sand [J]. Acta Geotechnica, 2010, 5(1): 43-62

[23] IdingerG, AklikP, WuW, BorjaR I. Centrifuge model test on the face stability of shallow tunnel [J]. Acta Geotech, 2011, 6(2): 105-117

[24] BerthozN, BranqueD, SubrinD. Face failure in homogeneous and stratified soft ground: Theoretical and experimental approaches on 1g EPBS reduced scale model [J]. Tunn Undergr Space Technol, 2012, 30(4): 25-37

[25] HagiwaraT, GrantR J, CalvelloM, TaylorR N. The effect of overlying strata on the distribution of ground movements induced by tunnelling in clay [J]. Soils Found (JSCE), 1999, 39(3): 63-73

[26] LeeC J, ChiangK H, KuoC M. Ground movement and tunnel stability when tunneling in sandy ground [J]. J Chin Inst Eng, 2004, 27(7): 1021-1032

[27] ChenR P, LiJ, KongL G, TangL J. Experimental study on face instability of shield tunnel in sand [J]. Tunn Undergr Space Technol, 2013, 33(1): 12-21

[28] ZhangF, GaoY, WuY, WangZ. Face stability analysis of large-diameter slurry shield-driven tunnels with linearly increasing undrained strength [J]. Tunn Undergr Space Technol, 2018, 78: 178-187

[29] MiuraK, MiuraS, TokiS. Deformation behavior of anisotropic dense sand under principal stress axes rotation [J]. Soils Found (JSCE), 1986, 26(1): 36-52

[30] YangZ X, LiX S, YangJ. Quantifying and modelling fabric anisotropy of granular soils [J]. Geotechnique, 2008, 58(4): 237-248

[31] TanakaT, SakaiT. Progressive failure and scale effect of trap-door problems with granular materials [J]. Soils Found (JSCE), 1993, 33(1): 11-22

[32] ChambonP, CorteJ F. Shallow tunnels in cohesionless soil: Stability of tunnel face [J]. J Geotech (ASCE), 1994, 120(7): 1148-1165

[33] KamataH, MashimoH. Centrifuge model test of tunnel face reinforcement by bolting [J]. Tunn Undergr Space Technol, 2003, 18(2): 205-212 3

[34] IglesiaG R, EinsteinH H, WhitmanR V. Investigation of soil arching with centrifuge tests [J]. J Geotech Geoenviron, 2014, 140(2): 04013005

[35] FRANZA A, MARSHALL A M, ZHOU B. Greenfield tunnelling in sands: The effects of soil density and relative depth [J]. Geotechnique, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.17.P.091.

[36] WhiteD J, TakeW A, BoltonM D. Soil deformation measurement using particle image velocimetry (PIV) and photogrammetry [J]. Geotechnique, 2003, 537619-631

[37] MarshallA M, FarrellR, KlarA, MairR. Tunnels in sands: The effect of size, depth and volume loss on greenfield displacements[J]. Geotechnique, 2012, 62(5): 385-399

[38] ChenW-FahLimit analysis and soil plasticity [M], 2007, Amsterdam, Elsevier