A-BQ, a classification system for anisotropic rock mass based on China National Standard

Abstract

The rock mass in nature is in most cases anisotropic, while the existing classifications are mostly developed with the assumption of isotropic conditions that not always meet the engineering requirements. In this study, an anisotropic system based on China National Standard of BQ, named as A-BQ, is developed to address the classification of anisotropic rock mass incorporating the anisotropy degree as well as the quality of rock mass. Two series of basic rating factors are incorporated including inherent anisotropy and structure anisotropy. The anisotropy degree of rock mass is characterized by the ratio of maximum to minimum quality score and adjusted by the confining stress. The quality score of rock mass is determined by the key factors of anisotropic structure occurrence and the correction factors of stress state and groundwater condition. The quality of rock mass is characterized by a quality score and classified in five grades. The assessment of stability status and probable failure modes are also suggested for tunnel and slope engineering for different quality grades. Finally, two cases of tunnel and slope are presented to illustrate the application of the developed classification system into the rock masses under varied stress state.

Keywords

anisotropy / rock mass / basic quality / classification / tunnel / slope

References

[1] TerzaghiK. Rock defects and load on tunnel supports [C]. Introduction to Rock Tunneling with Steel Support, 1946, Youngstown, Ohio, Commercial Shearing and Stamping Co., 1799

[2] BieniawskiZ. Engineering classification of jointed rock masses [J]. Civil Engineer in South Africa, 1973, 15(12): 335-343

[3] BartonN, LienR, LundeJ. Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support [J]. Rock mechanics, 1974, 6(4): 189-236

[4] PalmstromA. Characterizing rock masses by the RMi for use in practical rock engineering: Part 1: The development of the Rock Mass index (RMi) [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 1996, 11(2): 175-188

[5] HoekE, KaiserP K, BawdenW FSupport of underground excavations in hard rock [M], 1995, Rotterdam, Balkema

[6] GuD-Z, HuangD-C. Classification of rock mass structure and determination of its quality coefficient [J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 1979, 2(8): 8-13(in Chinese)

[7] GB 50218-94Standard for engineering classification of rock masses [S], 1994, Beijing, China Planning Press, 178(in Chinese)

[8] GB 50218-2014Standard for engineering classification of rock masses [S], 2014, Beijing, China Planning Press, 184(in Chinese)

[9] BartonN, QuadrosE. Anisotropy is everywhere, to see, to measure, and to model [J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2015, 48(4): 1323-1339

[10] BhasinR, BartonN, GrimstadE, ChryssanthskisP. Engineering geological characterization of low strength anisotropic rocks in the Himalayan region for assessment of tunnel support [J]. Engineering Geology, 1995, 40(34): 169-193

[11] HoekE, MaeinosP, BenissiM. Applicability of the geological strength index (GSI) classification for very weak and sheared rock masses. The case of the Athens Schist Formation [J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 1998, 57(2): 151-160

[12] SaroglouC, QiS-W, GuoS-F, WuF-Q. ARMR, a new classification system for the rating of anisotropic rock masses [J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2019, 78(5): 3611-3626

[13] HUDSON J A, HARRISON J P. Engineering rock mechanics: An introduction to the principles [M]. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008043010-2/50000-9.

[14] ISRMRock characterization, testing and monitoring: ISRM suggested methods [S], 1981, Oxford, Pergamon Press

[15] TsidziK. Propagation characteristics of ultrasonic waves in foliated rocks [J]. Bulletin of the International Association of Engineering Geology, 1997, 56: 103-113

[16] TsidziK. The influence of foliation on point load strength anisotropy of foliated rocks [J]. Engineering Geology, 1990, 29(1): 49-58

[17] RamamurthyT. Strength and modulus responses of anisotropic rocks [J]. Comprehensive Rock Engineering, 1993, 1: 313-329

[18] KwasniewskiA M. Mechanical behavior of anisotropic rocks [J]. Comprehensive Rock Engineering, 1993, 1: 285-312

[19] SAROGLOU H, TSIAMBAOS G. Classification of anisotropic rocks [C]// 11th Congress of the International Society for Rock Mechanics, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0940739195000385.

[20] AliabadianZ, ZhaoG-F, RussellA. Failure, crack initiation and the tensile strength of transversely isotropic rock using the Brazilian test [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2019, 122: 104073

[21] SAROGLOU H. Engineering behaviour of anisotropic and heterogeneous layered rocks [C]// In Proceedings of the IAEG conference “Global view of engineering geology and the environment”. Beijing, China, 2013: 721–731. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b15794-116.

[22] BagheripourM H, RahgozarR, PashnesazH, MalekinejadM. A complement to Hoek-Brown failure criterion for strength prediction in anisotropic rock [J]. Geo-mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 3(1): 61-81

[23] MatsukuraY, HashizumeK, OguchiC T. Effect of microstructure and weathering on the strength anisotropy of porous rhyolite [J]. Engineering Geology, 2002, 63(1): 39-47

[24] JaegerJ C. Shear failure of anisotropic rock [J]. Geological Magazine, 1960, 97(1): 65-72

[25] TienY M, KuoM C. A failure criterion for transversely isotropic rocks [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2011, 38(3): 399-412

[26] HoekE. Fracture of anisotropic rock [J]. Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 1964, 64(10): 501-523

[27] WalshJ B, BraceW F. A fracture criterion for brittle anisotropic rock [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1964, 69(16): 3449-3456

[28] ColakK, UnluT. Effect of transverse anisotropy on the Hoek-Brown strength parameter ‘m_i’ for intact rocks [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2004, 6(41): 1045-1052

[29] SaroglouH, TsiambaosG. A modified Hoek-Brown failure criterion for anisotropic intact rock [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2008, 45(2): 223-234

[30] RaoK S, RaoG V, RamamurthyT. A strength criterion for anisotropic rocks [J]. Ind Geotech J, 1986, 16(4): 317-333

[31] RamamurthyT, RaoG, SinghJ. A strength criterion for anisotropic rocks [C]. Proceedings of the fifth Australia-New Zealand Conference on Geomechanics, 1988, Australia, Institution of Engineers, 253

[32] NasseriM H B, RaoK S, RamamurthyT. Anisotropic strength and deformational behavior of Himalayan schists [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2003, 40(1): 3-23

[33] SaeidiO, VaneghiR G, RasouliV, GholamiR. A modified empirical criterion for strength of transversely anisotropic rocks with metamorphic origin [J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2013, 72(2): 257-269

[34] BieniawskiZ T. The point-load test in geotechnical practice [J]. Engineering Geology, 1975, 9(1): 1-11

[35] FranklinJ A. Suggested method for determining point load strength [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1985, 22(2): 51-60

[36] SinghT N, KaintholaA, VenkateshA. Correlation between point load index and uniaxial compressive strength for different rock types [J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2012, 45(2): 259-264

[37] VásárhelyiB. Some observations regarding the strength and deformability of sandstones in dry and saturated conditions [J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2003, 62(3): 245-249

[38] DeereD U. Technical description of rock cores for engineering purposes [J]. Rock Mechanics and Engineering Geology, 1964, 1(1): 16-22

[39] RamamurthyT, AroraV K. Strength predictions for jointed rocks in confined and unconfined states [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1994, 31(1): 9-22

[40] VUTUKURI V S, HOSSAINI S M F, FOROUGHI M H. A study of the effect of roughness and inclination of weakness planes on the strength properties of rock and coal [C]// Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on the Mechanics of Jointed and Faulted rock. Vienna, Austria, 1995: 151–155.

[41] GuoS-F, QiS-W, HuangX-L. Anisotropy of rockmass strength and its transformation critical confining stress [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32(S2): 3222-3227(in Chinese)

[42] GUO Song-feng, QI Sheng-wen, ZHAN Zhi-fa, MA Li-na, GURE E G, ZHANG Shi-shu. Numerical study on the progressive failure of heterogeneous geomaterials under varied confining stresses [J]. Engineering Geology, 2020: 269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105556.

[43] GuoS-F, QiS-W. Numerical study on progressive failure of hard rock samples with an unfilled undulate joint [J]. Engineering Geology, 2015, 193173-182

[44] ZhouY, WuS-C, GaoY-T, MisraA. Macro and meso analysis of jointed rock mass triaxial compression test by using equivalent rock mass (ERM) technique [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21(3): 1125-1135

[45] SaroglouH. Geological parameters affecting the geotechnical properties of intact rock. The effect of anisotropy [D], 2007, Athens, National Technical University of Athens, 480

[46] ShaP, WuF-Q, LiX, LiangN, ChangJ-Y. Squeezing deformation in layered surrounding rock and force characteristics of support system of a tunnel under high in-situ stress [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2015, 36(5): 1407-1414(in Chinese)

[47] ChenY-F, WeiK, LiuW, HuS-H, HuR, ZhouC-B. Experimental characterization and micromechanical modelling of anisotropic slates [J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2016, 49(9): 3541-3557