Physico-mechanical performance of debris-flow deposits with particular reference to characterization and recognition of debris flow-related sediments

Abstract

To characterize and recognize the debris flow-related deposits, the physico-mechanical performance of four deposits from the Dongyuege (DYG), Shawa (SW), Jiangjia Gully (JJG), and Gengdi (GD) debris flows in southwest China is investigated through laboratory analyses and tests. The four debris-flow materials can all be remolded into coherent, homogeneous cylinders with high densification and strength–porosity of 25%–36%, mean pore-throat radius of 0.46–5.89 µm, median pore-throat radius of 0.43–4.28 µm, P-wave velocity of 800–1200 m/s, modulus of elasticity of 28–103 MPa, unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of 220–760 kPa, and cohesion of 65–281 kPa. Based on the comparison in slurryability and formability among debris-flow deposits, granular flow deposits, fluvial deposits, residual lateritic clay and loess, whether a sediment can be cast into competent cylinders for physico-mechanical tests can be regarded as a diagnostic evidence of old debris-flow deposits. The discrepancy in physico-mechanical properties among the four debris-flow deposits suggests that the combination of foregoing physico-mechanical parameters can characterize assembling characteristics of debris flow-related sediments including grain size distribution, mineralogy, and accidental detritus. Four deposited sediments above can be surprisingly classified as hard soil-soft rocks according to UCS, and the hard soil-soft rock behaviors can advance the further understanding of debris flows.

Keywords

debris flow-related sediment / physico-mechanical performance / debris-flow susceptibility / assessment of debris-flow hazard / hard soil-soft rock

References

[1] SohnY K, RheeC W, KimB C. Debris flow andhyperconcentrated flood-flow deposits in an alluvial fan, Northwestern part of the Cretaceous Yongdong basin, Central Korea [J]. The Journal of Geology, 1999, 107(1): 111-132

[2] LinP S, LinJ Y, HungJ C, YangM D. Assessing debris-flow hazard in a watershed in Taiwan [J]. Engineering Geology, 2002, 66(34): 295-313

[3] SohnY K. Coarse-grained debris-flow deposits in the Miocene fan deltas, SE Korea: A scaling analysis [J]. Sedimentary Geology, 2000, 130(12): 45-64

[4] IversonR M. The physics of debris flows [J]. Reviews of Geophysics, 1997, 35(3): 245-296

[5] MortonD M, AlvarezR M, RuppertK R, GoforthB. Contrasting rainfall generated debris flows from adjacent watersheds at Forest Falls, Southern California, USA [J]. Geomorphology, 2008, 96(3): 322-338

[6] YangK, XuZ M, TianL, WangK, RenZ, TangY J, LuoJ Y, GaoH Y. Significance of coarse clasts in viscous debris flows [J]. Engineering Geology, 2020, 272: 105665

[7] OguchiT, OguchiC T. Late quaternary rapid talus dissection and debris flow deposition on an alluvial fan in Syria [J]. Catena, 2004, 55(2): 125-140

[8] NiH Y, ZhengW M, LiuX L, GaoY C. Fractal-statistical analysis of grain-size distributions of debris-flow deposits and its geological implications [J]. Landslides, 2011, 8(2): 253-259

[9] LiY, ZhouX J, SuP C, KongY D, LiuJ J. A scaling distribution for grain composition of debris flow [J]. Geomorphology, 2013, 19230-42

[10] D’arcyM, Roda-BoludaD C, WhittakerA C. Glacial-interglacial climate changes recorded by debris flow fan deposits, Owens Valley, California [J]. Quaternary Science Reviews, 2017, 169: 288-311

[11] WebbR H, GriffithsP G, RuddL P. Holocene debris flows on the Colorado Plateau: The influence of clay mineralogy and chemistry [J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 2008, 120(7): 1010-1020

[12] DetienneM, DelmelleP, GuevaraA, SamaniegoP, OpfergeltS, MothesP A. Contrasting origin of two clay-rich debris flows at cayambe volcanic complex, Ecuador [J]. Bulletin of Volcanology, 2017, 79(4): 27

[13] De BlasioF V, BreienH, ElverhøiA. Modelling a cohesive-frictional debris flow: An experimental, theoretical, and field-based study [J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2010, 366753-766

[14] KangH S, KimY T. Rheological properties of loose sands subjected to upward flow [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2017, 54(5): 664-673

[15] JohnsonA M, RodineJ R. Debris flow [M]. Slope Instability, 1984, Chichester, Wiley, 257361

[16] MajorJ J, PiersonT C. Debris flow rheology: Experimental analysis of fine-grained slurries [J]. Water Resources Research, 1992, 28: 841-857

[17] HüblJ, SteinwendtnerH. Estimation of rheological properties of viscous debris flow using a belt conveyor [J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part B: Hydrology Oceans and Atmosphere, 2000, 25(9): 751-755

[18] JeongS W, LocatJ, LeroueilS, MaletJ P. Rheological properties of fine-grained sediment: The roles of texture and mineralogy [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2010, 47(10): 1085-1100

[19] MayC L, GresswellR E. Spatial and temporal patterns of debris-flow deposition in the Oregon Coast Range, USA [J]. Geomorphology, 2004, 57(34): 135-149

[20] LopesL D C F L, BacellarL D A P, CastroP D T A. Assessment of the debris-flow susceptibility in tropical mountains using clast distribution patterns [J]. Geomorphology, 2016, 275: 16-25

[21] WilfordD J, SakalsM E, InnesJ L, SidleR C, BergerudW A. Recognition of debris flow, debris flood and flood hazard through watershed morphometrics [J]. Landslides, 2004, 1(1): 61-66

[22] SantangeloN, Daunis-I-EstadellaJ, DiC G, DiD V, FaillaceP I, Martín-FernándezJ A, RomanoP, SantoA, ScorpioV. Topographic predictors of susceptibility to alluvial fan flooding, Southern Apennines [J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2012, 37: 803-817

[23] KainC L, RigbyE H, MazengarbC. A combined morphometric, sedimentary, GIS and modelling analysis of flooding and debris flow hazard on a composite alluvial fan, Caveside, Tasmania [J]. Sedimentary Geology, 2018, 364: 286-301

[24] BrevikE C, ReidJ R. Differentiating till and debris flow deposits in glacial landscapes [J]. Soil Survey Horizons, 2000, 41: 83-90

[25] De ScallyF A, OwensI F, LouisJ. Controls on fan depositional processes in the schist ranges of the Southern Alps, New Zealand, and implications for debris-flow hazard assessment [J]. Geomorphology, 2010, 122(1): 99-116

[26] De ScallyF A, OwensI F. Depositional processes and particle characteristics on fans in the Southern Alps, New Zealand [J]. Geomorphology, 2005, 69(1): 46-56

[27] ZhouZ H, RenZ, WangK, TangY J, TianL, XuZ M. Effect of excess pore pressure on the long runout of debris flows over low gradient channels: A case study of the Dongyuege debris flow in Nu River, China [J]. Geomorphology, 2018, 308: 40-53

[28] TangY J, XuZ M, YangT Q, ZhouZ H, WangK, RenZ, YangK, TianL. Impacts of small woody debris on slurrying, persistence, and propagation in a low-gradient channel of the Dongyuege debris flow in Nu River, Southwest China [J]. Landslides, 2018, 15: 2279-2293

[29] LanH X, ZhouC H, WangL J, ZhangH Y, LiR H. Landslide hazard spatial analysis and prediction using GIS in the Xiaojiang watershed, Yunnan, China [J]. Engineering Geology, 2004, 76(12): 109-128

[30] GuoX J, CuiP, LiY. Debris flow warning threshold based on antecedent rainfall: A case study in Jiangjia Ravine, Yunnan, China [J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2013, 10(2): 305-314

[31] MarchiL, ArattanoM, DeganuttiA M. Ten years of debris-flow monitoring in the Moscardo Torrent (Italian Alps) [J]. Geomorphology, 2002, 46(12): 1-17

[32] CoussotP, MeunierM. Recognition, classification and mechanical description of debris flows [J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 1996, 40(34): 209-227

[33] GB/T 50123. Standard for soil test method [S]. 1999. (in Chinese)

[34] IversonR M, LoganM, LahusenR G, BertiM. The perfect debris flow? Aggregated results from 28 large-scale experiments [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 2010, 115: F03005

[35] LY/T 1243. Determination of cation exchange capacity in forest soil [S]. Beijing: The State Forestry Administration of the People’s Republic of China, 1999. (in Chinese)

[36] GB 50021Code for investigation of geotechnical engineering [S], 2001, Beijing, Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Construction of the People’s Republic of China(in Chinese)

[37] TerzaghiK, PeckR B, MesriGSoil mechanics in engineering practice [M], 19963rd edNew York, Wiley, 19-21

[38] MaletJ P, LaigleD, RemaîtreA, MaquaireO. Triggering conditions and mobility of debris flows associated to complex earthflows [J]. Geomorphology, 1996, 66(1–4): 215-235

[39] HoltzR D, KovacsW D, SheahanT CAn Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering [M], 20112nd ed.US, Pearson Education, Inc.

[40] National Engineering HandbookChapter 3–Engineering classification of earth materials” [S], 2012, Washington, DC, U.S., Department of Agriculture–Natural Resources Conservation Service

[41] LuS G, YuX L, ZongY T. Nano-microscale porosity and pore size distribution in aggregates of paddy soil as affected by long-term mineral and organic fertilization under ricewheat cropping system [J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2019, 186: 191-199

[42] CuetoN, BenaventeD, Martínez-MartínezJ, Garcìa-Del-CuraM A. Rock fabric, pore geometry and mineralogy effects on water transport in fractured dolostones [J]. Engineering geology, 2009, 107(12): 1-15

[43] LalaA M S, El-SayedN A A. Controls of pore throat radius distribution on permeability [J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2017, 157: 941-950

[44] PhillipsC JRheological investigation of debris flow material [D], 1988, New Zealand, University of Lincoln

[45] DasB MAdvanced soil mechanics [M], 20083rd ed.New York, Taylor & Francis

[46] PiersonT C, CostaJ E. A rheologic classification of subaereal sediment-water flows [M]. Debris Flows/Avalanches: Process, Recognition, and Mitigation, 1987, United States, Boulder Co., 112

[47] ScottK M, VallanceJ W, PringleP T. Sedimentology, behavior, and hazards of debris flows at mount rainier, Washington [J]. U S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 1995, 1547: 1-56

[48] CislaghiA, RigonE, LenziM A, BischettiG B. A probabilistic multidimensional approach to quantify large wood recruitment from hillslopes in mountainous-forested catchments [J]. Geomorphology, 2018, 306: 108-127

[49] RodineJ D, JohnsonA M. The ability of debris, heavily freighted with coarse clastic materials, to flow on gentle slopes [J]. Sedimentology, 1976, 23(2): 213-234

[50] PiersonT C. Dominant particle support mechanism in debris flows at MT Thomas, New Zealand, and implications for flow mobility [J]. Sedimentology, 1981, 28(1): 49-60

[51] SasanianS, NewsonT A. Use of mercury intrusion porosimetry for microstructural investigation of reconstituted clays at high water contents [J]. Engineering Geology, 2013, 158: 15-22

[52] KaitnaR, RickenmannD, SchatzmannM. Experimental study on rheologic behaviour of debris flow material [J]. Acta Geotechnica, 2007, 2(2): 71-85

[53] ChenuC, BissonnaisY L, ArrouaysD. Organic matter influence on clay wettability and soil aggregate stability [J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2000, 64(4): 1479-1486

[54] FestaV, FioreA, LuisiM, MiccoliM N, SpallutoL. Petrographic features influencing basic geotechnical parameters of carbonate soft rocks from Apulia (Southern Italy) [J]. Engineering geology, 2018, 233: 76-97

[55] International Society for Rock Mechanics ISRM. Suggested methods for the quantitative description of discontinuities in rock masses [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstract, 1978, 15(6): 319-368

[56] ASTM D2166M-16Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soil [S], 2000, United States, The American Society for Testing and Materials

[57] ErcoliL, ZimbardoM, NocillaA. Rock decay phenomena and collapse processes in the “Latomiae del Paradiso” in Syracuse (Sicily) [J]. Engineering Geology, 2014, 178(23): 155-165

[58] ParkD, MichalowskiR L. Three-dimensional stability analysis of slopes in hard soil/soft rock with tensile strength cut-off [J]. Engineering Geology, 2017, 229: 73-84

[59] MargheritaZ, ClaudioC, LauraE, AlessandraN. A risk assessment proposal for underground cavities in Hard Soils-Soft Rocks [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining, 2018, 103: 43-54

[60] OmarH, AhmadJ, NahazananH, MohammedT A, YusoffZ M. Measurement and simulation of diametrical and axial indirect tensile tests for weak rocks [J]. Measurement, 2018, 127: 299-307

[61] RemaîtreA, MaletJ P, MaquaireO. Geomorphology and kinematics of debris flows with high entrainment rates: A case study in the south French Alps [J]. Comptes Rendus Geosciences, 2011, 343(11): 777-794

[62] LeggN T, MeigsA J, GrantG E, KennardP. Debris flow initiation in proglacial gullies on Mount Rainier, Washington [J]. Geomorphology, 2014, 226: 249-260

[63] GodtJ W, CoeJ A. Alpine debris flows triggered by a 28 July 1999 thunderstorm in the central Front Range, Colorado [J]. Geomorphology, 2007, 84(12): 80-97

[64] ChiarleM, IannottiS, MortaraG, DelineP. Recent debris flow occurrences associated with glaciers in the Alps [J]. Global and Planetary Change, 2007, 56(1): 123-136

[65] GuthrieR, HockinA, ColquhounL, NagyT, EvansS G, AylesC. An examination of controls on debris flow mobility: Evidence from coastal British Columbia [J]. Geomorphology, 2010, 114(4): 601-613