A numerical study of fracture initiation under different loads during hydraulic fracturing

Abstract

The fracture initiation behavior for hydraulic fracturing treatments highlighted the necessity of proposing fracture criteria that precisely predict the fracture initiation type and location during the hydraulic fracturing process. In the present study, a Mohr-Coulomb criterion with a tensile cut-off is incorporated into the finite element code to determine the fracture initiation type and location during the hydraulic fracturing process. This fracture criterion considers the effect of fracture inclination angle, the internal friction angle and the loading conditions on the distribution of stress field around the fracture tip. The results indicate that the internal friction angle resists the shear fracture initiation. Moreover, as the internal friction angle increases, greater external loads are required to maintain the hydraulic fracture extension. Due to the increased pressure of the injected water, the tensile fracture ultimately determines the fracture initiation type. However, the shear fracture preferentially occurs as the stress anisotropy coefficient increases. Both the maximum tensile stress and equivalent maximum shear stress decrease as the stress anisotropy coefficient increases, which indicates that the greater the stress anisotropy coefficient, the higher the external loading required to propagate a new fracture. The numerical results obtained in this paper provide theoretical supports for establishing basis on investigating of the hydraulic fracturing characteristics under different conditions.

Keywords

hydraulic fracturing / internal friction angle / stress anisotropy coefficient / finite element method

References

[1] JiangH, ChenM, ZhangG-Q, JinY, ZhaoZ-F, ZhuG-F. Impact of oriented perforation on hydraulic fracture initiation and propagation. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2009, 28(7): 1321-1326

[2] JIN Xiao-chun, SHAN S. Fracture propagation direction and its application in hydraulic fracturing [C]// SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference. The Woodlands, TX: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/163832-MS.

[3] WangD, ChenM, JonY, TangP, SunY-L, YuanL, LiQExperimental study of fracture initiation and propagation from a wellbore, 2015, San Francisco, American Rock Mechanics Association

[4] WanniarachchiW A M, RanjithP G, PereraM S A, RathnaweeraT D, ZhangD C, ZhangC. Investigation of effects of fracturing fluid on hydraulic fracturing and fracture permeability of reservoir rocks: An experimental study using water and foam fracturing. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2018, 194: 117-135

[5] TangS-B, WangJ-X, ChenP-Z. Theoretical and numerical studies of cryogenic fracturing induced by thermal shock for reservoir stimulation. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2020, 125: 104160

[6] ZhouZ, YangH, WangX-C, ZhangQ-F. Fractured rock mass hydraulic fracturing under hydrodynamic and hydrostatic pressure joint action. Journal of Central South University, 2016, 23(10): 2695-2704

[7] TangS-B, ZhangH. Hydraulic fracture prediction theory based on the maximum tangential strain criterion. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2016, 35(S1): 2710-2719

[8] DongZ, TangS-B, RanjithP G, LangY-X. A theoretical model for hydraulic fracturing through a single radial perforation emanating from a borehole. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2018, 19628-42

[9] TANG Shi-bin, DONG Zhou, DUAN Dong, LI Ying-chun. A theoretical model for hydraulic fracturing through two symmetric radial perforations emanating from a borehole [J]. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2019, 1–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6094305.

[10] WangH-Y. Poro-elasto-plastic modeling of complex hydraulic fracture propagation: Simultaneous multi-fracturing and producing well interference. Acta Mechanica, 2016, 227(2): 507-525

[11] TunsakulJ, JongpradistP, KongkitkulW, Wonglerta, YouwaiS. Investigation of failure behavior of continuous rock mass around cavern under high internal pressure. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2013, 34: 110-123

[12] NingY-J, AnX-M, MaG-W. Footwall slope stability analysis with the numerical manifold method. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2011, 48(6): 964-975

[13] WangY-T, ZhouX-P, XuX. Numerical simulation of propagation and coalescence of flaws in rock materials under compressive loads using the extended non-ordinary state-based peridynamics. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2016, 163: 248-273

[14] LiQ-S, XingH-L. Numerical analysis of the material parameter effects on the initiation of hydraulic fracture in a near wellbore region. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineereing, 2015, 27: 1597-1608

[15] Goncalves da SilvaB, EinsteinH H. Finite Element study of fracture initiation in flaws subject to internal fluid pressure and vertical stress. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2014, 51(23): 4122-4136

[16] BobetAFracture coalescence in rock materials: Experimental observations and numerical predictions, 1997, Massachusetts, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

[17] HuangS-P, LiuD-M, YaoY-B, GanQ, CaiY-Y, XuL-L. Natural fractures initiation and fracture type prediction in coal reservoir under different in-situ stresses during hydraulic fracturing. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineereing, 2017, 43: 69-80

[18] BiJ, ZhouX-P. A novel numerical algorithm for simulation of initiation, propagation and coalescence of flaws subject to internal fluid pressure and vertical stress in the framework of general particle dynamics. Mechanics and Rock Engineeering, 2017, 50(7): 1833-1849

[19] ZhangY-S, ZhangJ-C. Lithology-dependent minimum horizontal stress and in-situ stress estimate. Tectonophysics, 2017, 703: 1-8

[20] ANSYS Inc. Theory Reference [M]. ANSYS Inc, 2013.

[21] ParkC H, BobetA. Crack initiation, propagation and coalescence from frictional flaws in uniaxial compression. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2010, 77(14): 2727-2748

[22] YangS-Q, JingH-W. Strength failure and crack coalescence behavior of brittle sandstone samples containing a single fissure under uniaxial compression. International Journal of Fracture, 2010, 168(2): 227-250

[23] WONG L N Y, EINSTEIN H. Fracturing behavior of prismatic specimens containing single flaws [C]// The 41st US Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS): American Rock Mechanics Association, 2006.

[24] WongL N Y, EinsteinH H. Crack coalescence in molded gypsum and carrara marble: Part 1. Macroscopic observations and interpretation. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2008, 42(3): 475-511

[25] Goncalves da SilvaBModeling of crack initiation, propagation and coalescence in rocks, 2009, Massachusetts, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

[26] LiH-Q, WongL N Y. Influence of flaw inclination angle and loading condition on crack initiation and propagation. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2012, 49(18): 2482-2499

[27] LeeH, JeonS. An experimental and numerical study of fracture coalescence in pre-cracked specimens under uniaxial compression. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2011, 48(6): 979-999

[28] YewC H, WengX-WMechanics of hydraulic fracturing, 2015, Houston, Gulf Professional Publishing