Active earth pressure for subgrade retaining walls in cohesive backfills with tensile strength cut-off subjected to seepage effects

Abstract

The commonly used Mohr-Coulomb (M-C) failure condition has a limitation that it overestimates the tensile strength of cohesive soils. To overcome this limitation, the tensile strength cut-off was applied where the predicted tensile strength is reduced or eliminated. This work then presented a kinematical approach to evaluate the active earth pressure on subgrade retaining walls in cohesive backfills with saturated seepage effects. An effective rotational failure mechanism was constructed assuming an associative flow rule. The impact of seepage forces, whose distribution is described by a closed-form solution, was incorporated into the analysis. The thrust of active earth pressure was derived from the energy conservation equation, and an optimization program was then coded to obtain the most critical solution. Several sets of charts were produced to perform a parameter analysis. The results show that taking soil cohesion into account has a distinct beneficial influence on the stability of retaining walls, while seepage forces have an adverse effect. The active earth pressure increases when tensile strength cut-off is considered, and this increment is more noticeable under larger cohesion.

Keywords

active earth pressure / seepage effect / subgrade retaining wall / tensile strength cut-off

References

[1] ChenW FLimit analysis and soil plasticity [M], 1975, Amsterdam, Elsevier

[2] ZhangB, MaZ Y, WangX, ZhangJ S, PengW Q. Reliability analysis of anti-seismic stability of 3D pressurized tunnel faces by response surfaces method [J]. Geomechanics and Engineering, 2020, 20(1): 43-54

[3] ZhangD B, LiuZ Z, ZhangJ H. A new failure mechanism for deep cavity and upper bound solution of supporting pressure [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2017, 24(9): 2082-2091

[4] PaikK H, SalgadoR. Estimation of active earth pressure against rigid retaining walls considering arching effects [J]. Géotechnique, 2003, 53(7): 643-654

[5] LiZ W, YangX L. Active earth pressure for retaining structures in cohesive backfills with tensile strength cut-off [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2019, 110: 242-250

[6] LiZ W, YangX L. Active earth pressure from unsaturated soils with different water levels [J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2018, 19(7): 06019013

[7] LiZ W, YangX L, LiY X. Active earth pressure coefficients based on a 3D rotational mechanism [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2019, 112: 342-349

[8] ZhangD B, JiangY, YangX L. Estimation of 3D active earth pressure under nonlinear strength condition [J]. Geomechanics and Engineering, 2019, 17(6): 515-525

[9] BarrosP L A. A Coulomb-type solution for active earth thrust with seepage [J]. Géotechnique, 2006, 56(3): 159-164

[10] BenmebarekN, BenmebarekS, KastnerR, SoubraA H. Passive and active earth pressures in the presence of groundwater flow [J]. Géotechnique, 2006, 56(3): 149-158

[11] BarrosP L A, SantosP J. Coefficients of active earth pressure with seepage effect [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2012, 49(6): 651-658

[12] AndersonD G, MartinG R, LamI P, WangJ NSeismic analysis and design of retaining walls, buried structures, slopes, and embankments [M], 2008, Washington, DC, The National Academies Press

[13] VahedifardF, LeshchinskyB A, MortezaeiK, LuN. Active earth pressures for unsaturated retaining structures [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2015, 141(11): 04015048

[14] DruckerD C, PragerW. Soil mechanics and plastic analysis or limit design [J]. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 1952, 102157-165

[15] PaulB. A modification of the Coulomb-Mohr theory of fracture [J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1961, 28(2): 259-268

[16] MichalowskiR L. Stability assessment of slopes with cracks using limit analysis [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2013, 50(10): 1011-1021

[17] MichalowskiR L. Stability of intact slopes with tensile strength cut-off [J]. Géotechnique, 2017, 67(8): 720-727

[18] AbdA H, UtiliS. Design of geosynthetic-reinforced slopes in cohesive backfills [J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2017, 45(6): 627-641

[19] ParkD, MichalowskiR L. Three-dimensional stability analysis of slopes in hard soil/soft rock with tensile strength cut-off [J]. Engineering Geology, 2017, 22973-84

[20] ViratjandrC, MichalowskiR L. Limit analysis of submerged slopes subjected to water drawdown [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2006, 43(8): 802-814

[21] SaadaZ, MaghousS, GarnierD. Stability analysis of rock slopes subjected to seepage forces using the modified Hoek-Brown criterion [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2012, 55: 45-54

[22] PanQ J, XuJ S, DiasD. Three-dimensional stability of a slope subjected to seepage forces [J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2017, 17(8): 04017035

[23] HarrM EGroundwater and seepage [M], 1962, New York, McGraw-Hill

[24] ZhangD B, ZhangB. Stability analysis of the pressurized 3D tunnel face in anisotropic and nonhomogeneous soils [J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2020, 20404020018

[25] YangX L, YinJ H. Upper bound solution for ultimate bearing capacity with a modified Hoek-Brown failure criterion [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2005, 424550-560

[26] YangX L. Seismic bearing capacity of a strip footing on rock slopes [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2009, 46(8): 943-954

[27] YangX L, YinJ H. Slope equivalent Mohr-Coulomb strength parameters for rock masses satisfying the Hoek-Brown criterion [J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2010, 39(4): 505-511

[28] YangX L, HuangF. Collapse mechanism of shallow tunnel based on nonlinear Hoek-Brown failure criterion [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2011, 26(6): 686-691

[29] YangX L, HuangF. Three-dimensional failure mechanism of a rectangular cavity in a Hoek-Brown rock medium [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2013, 61: 189-195

[30] HuangF, YangX L. Upper bound limit analysis of collapse shape for circular tunnel subjected to pore pressure based on the Hoek-Brown failure criterion [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2011, 26(5): 614-618

[31] ZhangJ H, WangW J, ZhangD B, ZhangB, MengF. Safe range of retaining pressure for three-dimensional face of pressurized tunnels based on limit analysis and reliability method [J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2018, 22(11): 4645-4656

[32] ZHANG J H, WANG W J, ZHANG B, ZHANG D B. Upper bound analysis for collapse failure of shield tunnel face excavated in unsaturated soils considering steady vertical flow [J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2019: 2145616. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2145616.

[33] ZhangJ H, ZhangB. Reliability analysis for seismic stability of tunnel faces in soft rock masses based on a 3D stochastic collapse model [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2019, 26(7): 1706-1718

[34] LiT Z, YangX L. Stability of plane strain tunnel headings in soils with tensile strength cut-off [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 95103138

[35] HuangF, ZhangM, WangF, LingT H, YangX L. The failure mechanism of surrounding rock around an existing shield tunnel induced by an adjacent excavation [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2020, 117103236

[36] LiZ W, YangX L, LiT Z. Static and seismic stability assessment of 3D slopes with cracks [J]. Engineering Geology, 2020, 265105450

[37] PanQ J, DiasD. The effect of pore water pressure on tunnel face stability [J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2016, 40(15): 2123-2136

[38] XuJ S, PanQ J, YangX L, LiW T. Stability charts for rock slopes subjected to water drawdown based on the modified nonlinear Hoek-Brown failure criterion [J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2018, 18(1): 04017133

[39] VieiraC S, de Lurdes LopesM, CaldeiraL M. Earth pressure coefficients for design of geosynthetic reinforced soil structures [J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2011, 295491-501