Evaluation of soil arching effect due to partially mobilized shear stress in piled and geosynthetic-reinforced embankment

Abstract

In piled and geosynthetic-reinforced (PGR) embankment, the arching behavior determines the overburden load on piles and subsoils. Placement of geosynthetic is effective in reducing the relative displacement between pile and subsoil. When the mobilized shear stress is less than the shear strength, partially developed arching will occur. Consequently, existing analytical methods, adopting the ultimate shear strength failure criterion, need to be improved. This study developed a simplified 2D analytical method, which is based on the developing arching effect, to evaluate the load redistribution of the PGR embankment. Then, the influences of embankment height and internal friction angle, subsoil depth, ratio of pile cap width to pile clear spacing (RPC) and geosynthetic tensile stiffness on the critical height ratio, stress concentration ratio, soil arching ratio, geosynthetic tension and axial strain were investigated. This study suggests that a RPC of 1:1.0 and a one-way of single-layer geosynthetic tensile stiffness of 2000 kN/m should be considered as the sensitivity thresholds for the PGR embankment.

Keywords

pile / geosynthetic / arching effect / mobilized shear stress / parametric analysis

References

[1] van EekelenS J M, HanJ. Geosynthetic-reinforced pile-supported embankments: State of the art [J]. Geosynthetics International, 2020, 27(2): 112-141

[2] GiroutR, BlancM, ThorelL, DiasD. Geosynthetic reinforcement of pile-supported embankments [J]. Geosynthetics International, 2018, 25(1): 37-49

[3] ZhangJ H, GuF, ZhangY Q. Use of building-related construction and demolition wastes in highway embankment: laboratory and field evaluations [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 230: 1051-1060

[4] ZHANG J H, PENG J H, LIU W Z, LU W H. Predicting resilient modulus of fine-grained subgrade soils considering relative compaction and matric suction [J]. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2019.1651756.

[5] ZengL, XiaoL Y, ZhangJ H, GaoQ F. Effect of the characteristics of surface cracks on the transient saturated zones in colluvial soil slopes during rainfall [J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2020, 79: 699-709

[6] PengJ H, ZhangJ H, LiJ, YaoY S, ZhangA S. Modeling humidity and stress-dependent subgrade soils in flexible pavements [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2020, 120: 103413

[7] McguireM, SloanJ, FilzG. Effectiveness of geosynthetic reinforcement for load transfer in column-supported embankments [J]. Geosynthetics International, 2020, 27(2): 200-218

[8] VillardP, HuckertA, BriançonL. Load transfer mechanisms in geotextile-reinforced embankments overlying voids: Numerical approach and design [J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2016, 44(3): 381-395

[9] ZHANG J H, PENG J H, ZENG L, LI J, LI F. Rapid estimation of resilient modulus of subgrade soils using performance-related soil properties [J]. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2019.1643022

[10] CollinJ G. Column supported embankment design considerations [C]. 52nd Annual Geotechnical Engineering Conference, 2004, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota

[11] van EekelenS J M, BrugmanM H ADesign guideline basal reinforced piled embankments (CUR 226, 2016) [M], 2016, Delft, CRC Press

[12] MarstonA. The theory of external loads on closed conduits in the light of the latest experiments [C]// Iowa Engineering Experiment Station Bulletin. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State College, 1930, 3835

[13] TerzaghiKTheoretical soil mechanics [M], 1943, New York, Wiley

[14] GuidoV A, KneuppelJ D, SweenyM A. Plate loading tests on geogrid-reinforced earth slabs [C]. Proceedings of the Geosynthetics’87, 1987, New Orleans, USA, IFAI, 216-225

[15] HewlettW J, RandolphM F. Analysis of piled embankments [J]. Ground Engineering, 1988, 21(3): 12-18

[16] LowB K, TangS K, ChoaV. Arching in piled embankments [J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1994, 120(11): 1917-1938

[17] KempfertH G, GobelC, AlexiewD, HeitzC. German recommendations for reinforced embankments on pile-similar elements [C]. EuroGeo3; Third European Geosynthetics Conference, 2004, Munich, Germany, Geotechnical Engineering with Geosynthetics, 279284

[18] ChenY M, CaoW P, ChenR P. An experimental investigation of soil arching within basal reinforced and unreinforced piled embankments [J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2008, 26(2): 164-174

[19] AbushararS W, ZhengJ J, ChenB G, YinJ H. A simplified method for analysis of a piled embankment reinforced with geosynthetics [J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2009, 27(1): 39-52

[20] BS8006–1Code of practice for strengthened/reinforced soils and other fills [S], 2010, London, UK, British Standards Institution

[21] van EekelenS J M, BezuijenA, van TolA F. An analytical model for arching in piled embankments [J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2013, 39: 78-102

[22] WangH L, ChenR P, ChengW, QiS, CuiY J. Full-scale model study on variations of soil stress in geosyntehtic-reinforced pile-supported track bed with water level change and cyclic loading [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2019, 56: 60-68

[23] HanJ, GabrM A. Numerical analysis of geosyntheticreinforced and pile-supported earth platforms over soft soil [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2002, 128(1): 44-53

[24] LiuH L, NgC W W, FeiK. Performance of a geogridreinforced and pile-supported highway embankment over soft clay: Case study [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2007, 133(12): 1483-1493

[25] BriançonL, VillardP. Design of geosyntheticreinforced platforms spanning localized sinkholes [J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2008, 26(5): 416-428

[26] MiaoL C, WangF, LvW H. Benefits of geosynthetic reinforcement in widening of embankments subjected to foundation differential settlement [J]. Geosynthetics International, 2014, 21: 321-332

[27] HuckertA, BriançonL, VillardP, GarcinP. Load transfer mechanisms in geotextile-reinforced embankments overlying voids: Experimental and analytical approaches [J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2016, 44(3): 442-456

[28] ZhuangY, EllisE. Finite-element analysis of a piled embankment with reinforcement and subsoil [J]. Geotechnique, 2016, 66(7): 596-601

[29] van EEKELEN S J M, VENMANS A A M, BEZUIJEN A, van TOL A F. Long term measurements in the Woerden geosynthetic-reinforced pile-supported embankment [J]. Geosynthetics International, 2017: 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.17.00022.

[30] KingD J, BouazzaA, GnielJ R, RoweR K, BuiH H. Serviceability design for geosynthetic reinforced column supported embankments [J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2017, 45(4): 261-279

[31] LuW H, MiaoL C, WangF, ZhangJ H, ZhangY X, WangH B. A case study on geogrid-reinforced and pile-supported widened highway embankment [J]. Geosynthetic International, 2020, 27(3): 261-274

[32] CHEN R P, LIU Q W, WANG H L, LIU Y, MA Q W. Performance of geosynthetic-reinforced pile-supported embankment on soft marine deposit [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeen.19.00136.

[33] HandyR L. The arch in soil arching [J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1985, 111(3): 302-318

[34] VillardP, GourcJ P, GiraudH. A geosynthetic reinforcement solution to prevent the formation of localized sinkholes [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2000, 37(5): 987-999

[35] LuW H, MiaoL C. A simplified 2-D evaluation method of the arching effect for geosynthetic-reinforced and pile-supported embankments [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2015, 65: 97-103

[36] FengS J, AiS G, ChenH X. Estimation of arching effect in geosynthetic-reinforced structures [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2017, 87: 188-197

[37] IglesiaG R, EinsteinH H, WhitmanR V. Determination of vertical loading on underground structures based on an arching evolution concept [C]. Proceedings of 3rd National Conference on Geo-Engineering for Underground Facilities, 1999, Reston, VA, ASCE, 495506

[38] HanJ, WangF, XuC, Al-NaddafM. Fully-mobilized soil arching versus partially-mobilized soil arching [C]. Proceedings of 2016 International Conference on Transportation Infrastructure and Materials, 2016, Lancaster PA, DEStech Publications

[39] HanJ, WangF, Al-NaddafM, XuC. Progressive development of two-dimensional soil arching with displacement [J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2017, 17(12): 04017112

[40] WangL, LeshchinskyB, EvansT M, XieY. Active and passive arching stresses in c′−ϕ′ soils: A sensitivity study using computational limit analysis [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2017, 84: 47-57

[41] VillardP, BriançonL. Design of geosynthetic reinforcements for platforms subjected to localized sinkholes [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2008, 45(2): 196-209

[42] FENG S J, AI S G, CHEN H X. Membrane effect of geosynthetic reinforcement subjected to localized sinkholes [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2018: 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2017-0592.

[43] WangF, MiaoL C. New design method of geosynthetic reinforced embankment over sinkholes [J]. Journal of Southeast University, 2009, 39(6): 1217-1221(in Chinese)

[44] AriyarathneP, LiyanapathiranaD S. Review of existing design methods for geosynthetic-reinforced pile-supported embankments [J]. Soils and Foundations, 2015, 55(1): 17-34

[45] KingD J, BouazzaA, GnielJ, RoweK, BuiH. Geosynthetic reinforced column supported embankments and the role of ground improvement installation effects [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2018, 55(6): 792-809

[46] SinghS, SivakuganN, ShuklaS. Can soil arching be insensitive to ϕ? [J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2010, 10(3): 124-128

[47] PhamH T V, SuleimanM T, WhiteD JNumerical analysis of geosynthetic: rammed aggregate pier supported embankment [C]//, 2004, Los Angeles, ASCE, 657-664