Changes of microbial diversity during pyrite bioleaching

Lu Yin , Hong-ying Yang , Xiang Li , Lin-lin Tong , Zhe-nan Jin , Qin Zhang

Journal of Central South University ›› 2020, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (5) : 1477 -1483.

PDF
Journal of Central South University ›› 2020, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (5) : 1477 -1483. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-020-4383-1
Article

Changes of microbial diversity during pyrite bioleaching

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Microorganisms, one of the key factors affecting the bioleaching process, change the components of extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) and community structure to survive in leaching environments. In this work, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) and 16S rDna high-throughput sequence analyses were used to reveal the microbial changes in planktonic and sessile phases during bioleaching. The results showed the occupation of sessile cells decreased from 66.2% to (10±3)%. After bioleaching, the planktonic and sessile cells have similar EPS, but they are different from the original cells. Pyrite dissolution mainly occurs at the early and late stages with the decreasing of particle diameter, by 50% and 40%, respectively. The 16S rDna gene based sequence analysis results in total of 1117420 Reads across the six samples, presented among 7 phyla, 9 classes, 17 orders, 23 families and 31 genera. Genera Leptospirillum and Sulfobacillus are the main bacteria at the early and middle stages, and Leptospirillum is the main genus at the end of bioleaching. Aquabacterium and Acidovorax are special genera in sessile cells and Weissella is special in planktonic ones.

Keywords

pyrite dissolution / sessile cells / planktonic cells / high-throughput sequence analysis / microbial diversity / bioleaching stage

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Lu Yin, Hong-ying Yang, Xiang Li, Lin-lin Tong, Zhe-nan Jin, Qin Zhang. Changes of microbial diversity during pyrite bioleaching. Journal of Central South University, 2020, 27(5): 1477-1483 DOI:10.1007/s11771-020-4383-1

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

BoseckerK. Bioleaching: Metal solubilization by microorganisms [J]. Fems Microbiology Reviews, 1997, 20(34): 591-604

[2]

MartínezL C, VadyvalooV. Mechanisms of post-transcriptional gene regulation in bacterial biofilms [J]. Frontiers in Cellular & Infection Microbiology, 2014, 4(4): 38

[3]

LuoW J, YangH Y, JinZ N. Study on the gold recovery of double refractory gold ore concentrate by biological oxidation pretreatment [J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2015, 1130: 379-382

[4]

CuiR C, YangH Y, ChenS, ZhangS, LiK F. Valence variation of arsenic in bioleaching process of arsenic-bearing gold ore [J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2010, 20(6): 1171-1176

[5]

NayakB. Mineral matter and the nature of pyrite in some high-sulfur tertiary coals of Meghalaya, northeast India [J]. Journal of the Geological Society of India, 2013, 81(2): 203-214

[6]

BevillquaD, LahtiH P, SuegamaH, GaraiaJ O, AssisV B, JaakkoA P, OlliH T. Effect of Na-chloride on the bioleaching of a chalcopyrite concentrate in shake flasks and stirred tank bioreactors [J]. Hydrometallurgy, 2013, 138(113): 1-13

[7]

YangB, ZhaoC X, LuoW, LiaoR, GanM, WangJ, LiuX, QiuG. Catalytic effect of silver on copper release from chalcopyrite mediated by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans [J]. J Hazard Mater, 2020, 392122290

[8]

YangB, LinM, FangJ, ZhangR, LuoW, WangX, LiaoR, WuB, WangJ, GanM, LiuB, ZhangY, LiuX, QinW, QiuG. Combined effects of jarosite and visible lighton chalcopyrite dissolution mediated by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans [J]. Sci Total Environ, 2020, 698134175

[9]

SchippersA, SandW. Bacterial leaching of metal sulfides proceeds by two indirect mechanisms via thiosulfate or via polysulfides and sulfur [J]. Applied & Environmental Microbiology, 1999, 65(1): 319

[10]

HenriciA T, JohnsonD E. Studies of freshwater bacteria: II. stalked bacteria, a new order of schizomycetes [J]. Journal of Bacteriology, 1935, 30161

[11]

LiQ, SandW. Mechanical and chemical studies on EPS from Sulfobacillus thermosulfidooxidans: From planktonic to biofilm cells [J]. Colloids & Surfaces B Biointerfaces, 2017, 15334-40

[12]

DengS, GuG-h, WuZ-t, XuX-yi. Bioleaching of arsenopyrite by mixed cultures of iron-oxidizing and sulfur-oxidizing microorganisms [J]. Chemosphere, 2017, 185403-411

[13]

FlemmingH C. The perfect slime [J]. Colloids & Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 2011, 86(2): 251-259

[14]

KiwiJ, NadtochenkoV. Evidence for the mechanism of photocatalytic degradation of the bacterial wall membrane at the TiO2 interface by ATR-FTIR and laser kinetic spectroscopy [J]. Langmuir, 2005, 21(10): 4631-4641

[15]

VilinskaA, RaoK H. Surface characterization of acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans adapted to high copper and zinc ions concentration [J]. Geomicrobiology Journal, 2011, 28(3): 221-228

[16]

XiaL, ShenZ, VargasT, SunW, RuanR, XieZ, QiuG. Attachment of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans onto different solid, substrates and fitting through Langmuir and Freundlich equations [J]. Biotechnology Letters, 2013, 35(12): 2129-2136

[17]

GehrkeT, TelegdiJ, ThierryD. Importance of extracellular polymeric substances from Thiobacillus ferrooxidans for bioleaching [J]. Applied & Environmental Microbiology, 1998, 64(7): 2743-2747

[18]

SharmaP K, DasA, RaoK H, ForssbergK S E. Surface characterization of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans cells grown under different conditions [J]. Hydrometallurgy, 2003, 71(1): 285-292

[19]

DiaoM-x, NguyenT A H, TaranE, MahlerS, NguyenA V. Differences in adhesion of A. thiooxidans and A. ferrooxidans on chalcopyrite as revealed by atomic force microscopy with bacterial probes [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2014, 61(6): 9-15

[20]

DevasiaP, NatarajanK A, SathyanarayanaD N, RaoG R. Surface chemistry of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans relevant to adhesion on mineral surfaces [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1994, 59(12): 4051-4055

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

105

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/