Crashworthiness of innovative hexagonal honeycomb-like structures subjected to out-of-plane compression

Abstract

Seeking for innovative structures with higher mechanical performance is a continuous target in railway vehicle crashworthiness design. In the present study, three types of hexagonal reinforced honeycomb-like structures were developed and analyzed subjected to out-of-plane compression, namely triangular honeycomb (TH), double honeycomb (DH) and full inside honeycomb (FH). Theoretical formulas of average force and specific energy absorption (SEA) were constructed based on the energy minimization principle. To validate, corresponding numerical simulations were carried out by explicit finite element method. Good agreement has been observed between them. The results show that all these honeycomb-like structures maintain the same collapsed stages as conventional honeycomb; cell reinforcement can significantly promote the performance, both in the average force and SEA; full inside honeycomb performs better than the general, triangular and double schemes in average force; meanwhile, its SEA is close to that of double scheme; toroidal surface can dissipate higher plastic energy, so more toroidal surfaces should be considered in design of thin-walled structure. These achievements pave a way for designing high-performance cellular energy absorption devices.

Keywords

honeycomb-like structure / crashworthiness / basic fold element / structural reinforcement

References

[1] WangZ. Recent advances in novel metallic honeycomb structure [J]. Composites Part B, 2019, 166: 731-741

[2] WangZ-g, WeiZ, LiuJ-fu. Initial densification strain point’s determination of honeycomb structure subjected to out-of-plane compression [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2017, 24(7): 1671-1675

[3] CuiC, WangZ, ZhouW, WuY, WeiW. Branch point algorithm for structural irregularity determination of honeycomb [J]. Composites Part B, 2019, 162: 323-330

[4] WangZ, WangX, ShiCHONG, ZhouW. Mechanical behaviors of square metallic tube reinforced with rivets—Experiment and simulation [J]. International Journal of Mechanical Science, 2019, 163: 105118

[5] JingL, SuX, ChenD, YangF, ZhaoL. Experimental and numerical study of sandwich beams with layered-gradient foam cores under low-velocity impact [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2019, 135227-244

[6] XiaoL-j, SongW-dong. Additively-manufactured functionally graded Ti-6Al-4V lattice structures with high strength under static and dynamic loading: Experiments [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2018, 111: 255-272

[7] LiX, XiaoL, SongW. Deformation and failure modes of Ti-6Al-4V lattice-walled tubes under uniaxial compression [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2019, 130: 27-40

[8] XiaoL J, SongW D, HuM L, LiP F. Compressive properties and micro-structural characteristics of Ti–6Al–4V fabricated by electron beam melting and selective laser melting [J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2019, 764: 138204

[9] ChenD, JingL, YangF. Optimal design of sandwich panels with layered-gradient aluminum foam cores under air-blast loading [J]. Composites Part B, 2019, 166169-186

[10] WangZ, YaoS, LuZ, HuiD, FeoL. Matching effect of honeycomb-filled thin-walled square tube-experiment and simulation [J]. Composite Structures, 2016, 157: 494-505

[11] LiuJ, ChenW S, HaoH, WangZ. Numerical study of low-speed impact response of sandwich panel with tube filled honeycomb core [J]. Composite Structures, 2019, 220: 736-748

[12] LiM, DengZ-q, GuoH-w, LiuR-q, DingB-chen. Optimizing crashworthiness design of square honeycomb structure [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21(3): 912-919

[13] WangZ, LiZ, ShiC, ZhouW. Mechanical performance of vertex-based hierarchical vs square thin-walled multi-cell structure [J]. Thin-walled Struct, 2019, 134: 102-110

[14] FangJ, SunG, QiuN, PangT, LiS, LiQ. On hierarchical honeycombs under out-of-plane crushing [J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2018, 135: 1-13

[15] WangZ, LiZ, ShiCH, ZhouW. Theoretical and numerical analysis of the folding mechanism of vertex-based hierarchical honeycomb structure [J]. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structure, 2019

[16] QiuN, GaoY, FangJ, FengZ, SunG, LiQ. Crashworthiness analysis and design of multi-cell hexagonal columns under multiple loading cases [J]. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 2015, 104: 89-101

[17] FangJ, GaoY, SunG, ZhengG, LiQ. Dynamic crashing behavior of new extrudable multi-cell tubes with a functionally graded thickness [J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2015, 103: 63-73

[18] FangJ, GaoY, SunG, QiuN, LiQ. On design of multi-cell tubes under axial and oblique impact loads [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2015, 95: 115-126

[19] WangZ, LiuJ. Numerical and theoretical analysis of honeycomb structure filled with circular aluminum tubes subjected to axial compression [J]. Composites Part B, 2019, 165: 626-635

[20] WangZ, LiZ, XiongW. Numerical study on three-point bending behavior of honeycomb sandwich with ceramic tile [J]. Composites Part B, 2019, 167: 63-70

[21] HallquistJ. LS-DYNA user’s manual[M]. Livemore Software Technology Corporation, 2003

[22] WangZ, LiZ, ZhouW, HuiD. On the influence of structural defects for honeycomb structure [J]. Composites Part B, 2018, 142: 183-192

[23] BS EN15227:2008. Railway applications—Crashworthiness requirements for railway vehicle bodies [S]. 2008.