Enhancement of resilient modulus of cohesive soil using an enzymatic preparation

Ahmed F. Zidan , Abdullah A. Aboukhadra , Yasser Gaber

Journal of Central South University ›› 2019, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (9) : 2596 -2608.

PDF
Journal of Central South University ›› 2019, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (9) : 2596 -2608. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-019-4197-1
Article

Enhancement of resilient modulus of cohesive soil using an enzymatic preparation

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The current study aims to evaluate the dynamic response of stabilized cohesive soil using an enzymatic preparation in terms of resilient modulus. We ran a series of resilient modulus testing according to AASHTO T307 on three types of cohesive soil treated with an enzymatic preparation to investigate its potential on roads construction. The results show significant improvement in the resilient modulus values, estimated at 1.4 to 4.4 times that observed for the untreated soil. Because of the complexity in conducting the resilient modulus measurement, we did a regression analysis to produce reliable correlation formula to predict the resilient modulus for untreated and stabilised soil samples involving stress state. The resilient modulus values for the subgrade materials at the anticipated field stresses were determined using a universal model. The enzymatic preparation was applied in pavement of a sample road and evaluated using the plate load test. SEM analysis for soil samples shows improvement in the soil compaction via reduction of voids between soil particles. XRD analysis shows no major structural changes in the treated soils. The enzymatic preparation contains 43 mg/mL of proteins. We used the SDS-PAGE (sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis) technique to identify the main protein components; however, the presence of interfering materials (surfactants) hinders the separation.

Keywords

enzyme / resilient modulus / cyclic loading / regression analysis / plate load test

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ahmed F. Zidan, Abdullah A. Aboukhadra, Yasser Gaber. Enhancement of resilient modulus of cohesive soil using an enzymatic preparation. Journal of Central South University, 2019, 26(9): 2596-2608 DOI:10.1007/s11771-019-4197-1

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

KushwahaS S, KishanD, DindorkarN. Stabilization of expansive soil using eko soil enzyme for highway embankment [J]. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2018, 5(9): 19667-19679

[2]

TingleJ S, SantoniR L. Stabilization of clay soils with nontraditional additives [J]. Transportation Research Record, 2003, 1819(1): 72-84

[3]

GanapathyG P, GobinathR, AkinwumiI I, KovendiranS, ThangarajM, LokeshN, AnasS M, YogeswaranP, HemaS. Bio-enzymatic stabilization of a soil having poor engineering properties [J]. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 2017, 15(3): 401-409

[4]

MitikieB B, LeeT S, ChangB C. Application of enzyme to clay brick and its effect on mechanical properties [J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2018, 22(7): 2528-2537

[5]

RajoriaV, KaurS. A review on stabilization of soil using bio-enzyme [J]. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 2014, 3(1): 75-78

[6]

KhanT A, TahaM R. Effect of three bioenzymes on compaction, consistency limits, and strength characteristics of a sedimentary residual soil [J]. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2015

[7]

KhanL I, SarkerM. Enzyme enhanced stabilization of soil and fly ash [C]// American Society of Civil Engineers ASCE, National Conference. Dallas, United States, 19934358

[8]

DrummE C, Boateng-PokuY, Johnson, PierceT. Estimation of subgrade resilient modulus from standard tests [J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering (ASCE), 1990, 116(5): 774-789

[9]

LiD, ErnestT S. Resilient modulus for fine-grained subgrade soils [J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering (ASCE), 1994, 120(6): 939-957

[10]

LekarpF, IsacssonU, DawsonA. State of Art I: Resilient response of unbound aggregates [J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE, 2000, 26(1): 66-75

[11]

YanA, QuintusH L V. Study of LTPP laboratory resilient modulus test data and response characteristics [R]. Publication No. FHWA-RD-02-051, 2002, McLean, VA, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration: 173

[12]

PingW, LingCEnhancement of resilient modulus data for the design of pavement structures in Florida [R], 2007

[13]

MohammadL N, HerathA, GudishalaR, NazzalM D, Abu-FarsakhM Y, AlshibliKDevelopment of models to estimate the subgrade and subbase layers' resilient modulus from in situ devices test results for construction control [M], 2008

[14]

NazzalM D, MohammadL N. Estimation of resilient modulus of subgrade soils for design of pavement structures [J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering (ASCE), 2010, 22(7): 726-734

[15]

MousaviH, GabrM A, BordenR H. Subgrade resilient modulus prediction using lightweight deflectometer data [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2017, 54(3): 304-312

[16]

VelasquezR A, MarasteanuM O, HozalskiR M. Investigation of the effectiveness and mechanisms of enzyme products for subgrade stabilization [J]. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2006, 7(3): 213-220

[17]

VelasquezR A, MarasteanuM O, HozalskiR, ClyneTPreliminary laboratory investigation of enzyme solutions as a soil stabilizer [R], 2005

[18]

RenjithR, RobertD, FullerA, SetungeS, O'DonnellB, NuciforaREnzyme based soil stabilization for unpaved road construction [C]// MATEC Web of Conferences, 2017

[19]

AboukhadraA, ZidanA F, GaberY. Evaluation of strength behaviour of different Egyptian soils using enzymatic stabilizers [J]. Cogent Engineering, 2018, 5(1): 1-11

[20]

AASHTO.Guide for design of pavement structures [M], 1993, Washington, DC, USA, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials

[21]

GroegerJ L, RadaG R, LopezA. AASHTO T307-Background and discussion, in resilient modulus testing for pavement components [S]. ASTM International, 2003

[22]

BradfordM M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding [J]. Analytical Biochemistry, 1976, 72(12): 248-254

[23]

Carmichael, IiiR F, StuartE. Predicting resilient modulus: A study to determine the mechanical properties of subgrade soils [R]. Transportation Research Record 1043, TRB, Washington, D C: National Research Council, 1978145148

[24]

FarrarM J, TurnerJ P. Resilient modulus of Wyoming subgrade soils [R]. Mountain Plains Consortium Report No 91-1, 1991, Luramie, Wyoming, The University of Wyoming

[25]

ShongtaoD, ZollarsJ. Resilient modulus of Minnesota road research project subgrade soil [R]. Transportation Research Record 1786, TRB, 2002, Washington, D.C., National Research Council: 2028

[26]

RahimA M. Subgrade soil index properties to estimate resilient modulus for pavement design [J]. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2005, 6(3): 163-169

[27]

JiR, SiddikiN, NantungT, KimD. Evaluation of resilient Modulus of subgrade and base materials in Indiana and its implementation in MEPDG [J]. The Scientific World Journal, 2014

[28]

AdamsM T, CollinJ G. Large model spread footing load tests on geosynthetic reinforced soil foundations [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering (ASCE), 1997, 123(1): 66-72

[29]

LaemmliU K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4 [J]. Nature, 1970, 227: 680-685

[30]

GaberY, MekashaS, Vaaje-KolstadG, EijsinkV G, FraaijeM W. Characterization of a chitinase from the cellulolytic actinomycete Thermobifida fusca [J]. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Proteins and Proteomics, 2016, 1864(9): 1253-1259

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

140

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/