Reconstructing bubble profiles from gas-liquid two-phase flow data using agglomerative hierarchical clustering method

Abstract

The knowledge of bubble profiles in gas-liquid two-phase flows is crucial for analyzing the kinetic processes such as heat and mass transfer, and this knowledge is contained in field data obtained by surface-resolved computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. To obtain this information, an efficient bubble profile reconstruction method based on an improved agglomerative hierarchical clustering (AHC) algorithm is proposed in this paper. The reconstruction method is featured by the implementations of a binary space division preprocessing, which aims to reduce the computational complexity, an adaptive linkage criterion, which guarantees the applicability of the AHC algorithm when dealing with datasets involving either non-uniform or distorted grids, and a stepwise execution strategy, which enables the separation of attached bubbles. To illustrate and verify this method, it was applied to dealing with 3 datasets, 2 of them with pre-specified spherical bubbles and the other obtained by a surface-resolved CFD simulation. Application results indicate that the proposed method is effective even when the data include some non-uniform and distortion.

Keywords

bubble profile reconstruction / gas-liquid two-phase flow / clustering method / surface-resolved computational fluid dynamics (CFD) / distorted bubble shape

References

[1] LiuG, LiM-s, ZhouB-j, ChenY-y, LiaoS-ming. General indicator for techno-economic assessment of renewable energy resources [J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 156: 416-426

[2] BoyerC, DuquenneA, WildG. Measuring techniques in gas-liquid and gas-liquid-solid reactors [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2002, 57: 3185-3215

[3] BesagniG, InzoliF, ZiegenheinT. Two-phase bubble columns: A comprehensive review [J]. Chem Engineering, 2018, 2(2): 13-88

[4] MizushimaY, SakamotoA, SaitoT. Measurement technique of bubble velocity and diameter in a bubble column via single-tip optical-fiber probing with judgment of the pierced position and angle [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2013, 100: 98-104

[5] AlwisL, SunT, GrattanK. Developments in optical fibre sensors for industrial applications [J]. Optics & Laser Technology, 2016, 78: 62-66

[6] WoroszT, BernardM, KongR, ToptanA, KimS, HoxieC. Sensitivity studies on the multi-sensor conductivity probe measurement technique for two-phase flows [J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2016, 310: 552-563

[7] BarigoouM, GreavesM. Bubble-size distributions in a mechanically agitated gas-liquid contactor [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1992, 47: 2009-2025

[8] LaakkonenMDevelopment and validation of mass transfer models for the design of agitated gas-liquid reactors [D], 2006, Otaniemi, Helsinki University of Technology

[9] LiuL, YanH, ZhaoG. Experimental studies on the shape and motion of air bubbles in viscous liquids [J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2015, 62: 109-121

[10] MaJ, ZhouP, ChengW, SongY, ShiP. Dimensional analysis and experimental study of gas penetration depth model for submerged side-blown equipment [J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2016, 75: 220-227

[11] BusciglioA, GrisafiF, ScargialiF, BrucatoA. On the measurement of local gas hold-up, interfacial area and bubble size distribution in gas-liquid contactors via light sheet and image analysis: Imaging technique and experimental results [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2013, 102: 551-566

[12] Gomez-HernandezJ, van OmmenJ R, WagnerE, MuddeR F. A fast reconstruction algorithm for time-resolved X-ray tomography in bubbling fluidized beds [J]. Powder Technology, 2016, 290: 33-44

[13] SinghB K, QuiyoomA, BuwaV V. Dynamics of gas-liquid flow in a cylindrical bubble column: Comparison of electrical resistance tomography and voidage probe measurements [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2017, 158: 124-139

[14] ElghobashiS. Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flows laden with droplets or bubbles [J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2019, 51: 217-244

[15] SubramaniamS. Lagrangian-Eulerian methods for multiphase flows [J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2013, 39: 215-245

[16] DrewD A. Mathematical modeling of two-phase flow [J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1983, 15: 261-291

[17] Ma T, SANTARELLI C, ZIEGENHEIN T, LUCAS D, FROHLICH J. Direct numerical simulation-based Reynolds-averaged closure for bubble-induced turbulence [J]. Physical Review Fluids, 2017, 2: 034301. DOI: 10.1103/ PhysRevFluids.2.034301.

[18] ShiP, RzehakR. Bubbly flow in stirred tanks: Euler-Euler/RANS modeling [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2018, 190: 419-435

[19] LuY, HuangJ, ZhengP. A CFD-DEM study of bubble dynamics in fluidized bed using flood fill method [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2015, 274: 123-131

[20] AkhtarA, PareekV, TadeM. CFD simulations for continuous flow of bubbles through gas-liquid columns: Application of VOF method [J]. Chemical Product and Process Modeling, 2007, 2(1): 9

[21] ColombetD, LegendreD, RissoF, CockxA, GuiraudP. Dynamics and mass transfer of rising bubbles in a homogenous swarm at large gas volume fraction [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2015, 763: 254-285

[22] BieberleM, BarthelF, MenzH J, MayerH G, HampelU. Ultrafast three-dimensional X-ray computed tomography [J]. Applied Physics Letters, 2011, 98034101

[23] BodenS, HaghnegahdarM, HampelU. Measurement of Taylor bubble shape in square channel by microfocus X-ray computed tomography for investigation of mass transfer [J]. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 2017, 5349-55

[24] DosS E N d, PaivaR L, PipaD R, MoralesR E M d, SilvaM J. Three-dimensional bubble shape estimation in two-phase gas-liquid slug flow [J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2018, 18: 1122-1130

[25] MurtaghF, ContrerasP. Algorithms for hierarchical clustering: an overview [J]. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2012, 2: 86-97

[26] ANSYS Inc. ANSYS Fluent 12.0 [M]. USA: Lebanon, 2009.

[27] OrazagS A, StaroselskyI, FlanneryW S, ZhangY. Introduction to renormalization group modeling of turbulence [M]. Simulation and Modelling of Turbulent Flows, 1996, New York, Oxford University Press: 155183

[28] ScardovelliR, ZaleskiS. Direct numerical simulation of free-surface and interfacial flow [J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1999, 31: 567-603

[29] MurtaghF, DownsG, ContrerasP. Hierarchical clustering of massive, high dimensional data sets by exploiting ultrametric embedding [J]. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 2008, 30: 707-730

[30] DobkinD, HershbergerJ, KirkpatrickD, SuriS. Computing the intersection-depth of polyhedral [J]. Algorithmica, 1993, 9: 518-533