A framework for train derailment risk analysis

Abstract

This study aims to develop a framework based on the Nadal formula to assess train derailment risk. Monte Carlo simulation was adopted to develop 10000 sets of random parameters to assess train derailment risk subject to the curvature radius of the track, the difference between the flange angle and the equivalent conicity, and accelerations from 250 to 989.22 gal during horizontal earthquake. The results indicated that railway in Taiwan, China has no derailment risk under normal conditions. However, when earthquakes occur, the derailment risk increases with the unloading factor which is caused by seismic force. The results also show that equivalent conicity increases derailment risk; as a result, equivalent conicity should be listed as one of maintenance priorities. In addition, among all train derailment factors, flange angle, equivalent conicity and unload factors are the most significant ones.

Keywords

derailment / performance / flange angle / equivalent conicity / reliability / risk / earthquake

References

[1] XiaoX-B, LingL, JinX-S. A study of the derailment mechanism of a high speed train due to an earthquake [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics: International Journal of Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility, 2011, 50(3): 449-470

[2] HsuW K, ChiangW L, ChenC W. Earthquake risk assessment and optimal risk management strategies for Hi-Tech Fabs in Taiwan [J]. Nat Hazards, 2012, 65(3): 2063-2076

[3] NADAL M J. Théorie de la stabilité des locomotives, Part 2: Mouvement de lacet [M]. Annls Mines, 1896. (in French)

[4] MasakiM. Quasi-static deraliment of a wheelset [J]. QR of RTRI, 1986, 27: 94-97

[5] YoshihiroS. Study of safety factor against derailment for rail vehicles [J]. Transactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1991, 57: 542: 3164-3167

[6] CherchasD B. Derailment of railway wheel climb probability based on the derailment coefficient [J]. Journal of Franklin Institute, 1981, 312: 31-40

[7] CherchasD B, EnglishG W, McilveenE R, SchwierC. Prediction of the probability of rail vehicle derailment during crossing collision [J]. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, Transactions of ASME, 1982, 104: 119-132

[8] WEINSTOCK H. Wheel climb derailment criteria for evaluation of rail vehicle safety [C]// Winter Annual Meeting of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. 1984, 84-WA/RT-1.

[9] MasakiM, HiroakiI. Safety criteria for evaluation of the railway vehicle derailment [J]. QR of RTRI, 1999, 40: 18-25

[10] XiangJ, LiD-J, ZengQ-Y. Simulation of spatially coupling dynamic response of train-track time-variant system [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2003, 10(3): 226-230

[11] XiangJ, HeD, ZengQ-Y. Analysis theory of spatial vibration of high-speed train and slab track system [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2008, 15: 121-126

[12] UCHIDA M, TAKA H, MURAMATSU H, ISHIDA H. Derailment safety evaluation by analytic equations [R]. World Congress on Railway Research, Köln, November 2001: 25–29.

[13] LeeS S, LeeJ H, ParkI K, SongS J, ChoiM Y. A Study on the evaluation methods of running safety for railway vehicle [J]. Key Engineering Materials, 2006, 321–323: 1499-1502

[14] LeeS S, YoonD J, LeeJ H, LeeS. Running safety estimation of korean style high speed railway vehicle [J]. Key Engineering Materials, 2004, 270–273: 1989-1994

[15] LinC C J, LinP Y, ChangT M, LinT K, WengY T, ChangK C, TsaiK CDevelopment of on-site earthquake early warning system for taiwan (Part I: Parametric analysis study) [C]// Dr Sebastiano D’Amico, 2012, Croatia, Earthquake Research and Analysis-New Frontiers in Seismology.: 330358InTech

[16] LIN C C J, SHEN Z P. Application of neural networks on recent development of the earthquake early warning system for Taiwan [C]// Proceeding of the 9th US National and 10th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering, (2010EQ Conf.). Toronto, Canada, 2010.

[17] LinC C J, ShenZ P, HuangS KPredicting structural response with on-site earthquake early warning system using neural networks [C]// Proceedings of the Ninth Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering Building, 2011, Auckland, New Zealand, Earthquake-Resilient Society

[18] MohammadzadehaS, GhahremaniaS. Estimation of train derailment probability using rail profile alterations [J]. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, Maintenance, Management, Life-Cycle Design and Performance, 2010, 8(11): 1034-1053

[19] NicholasW, RobertF, MatthewW, AndreasH, MikaelW, JerryE, AnnaO. Assessment of safety against derailment using simulations and vehicle acceptance tests: A worldwide comparison of state-of-the-art assessment methods [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics: International Journal of Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility, 2011, 49(7): 1113-1157

[20] ChengY C, HuangC H, KuoC M, ChenC H. Derailment risk analysis of a tilting railway vehicle moving over irregular tracks under wind loads [J]. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, 2013, 13(8): 1350038

[21] MetropolisN, StanislawU. The monte carlo method [J]. Journal of the American statistical association, 1949, 44247335-341

[22] XuX-Z. The derailment limit study about train [J]. Jouranl of Shandong University of Technology, 2006, 20(2): 24-25