Kinematic analysis of geosynthetics-reinforced steep slopes with curved sloping surfaces and under earthquake regions

Jian-feng Zhou , Chang-bing Qin , Qiu-jing Pan , Cheng-yang Wang

Journal of Central South University ›› 2019, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (7) : 1755 -1768.

PDF
Journal of Central South University ›› 2019, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (7) : 1755 -1768. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-019-4131-6
Article

Kinematic analysis of geosynthetics-reinforced steep slopes with curved sloping surfaces and under earthquake regions

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

A procedure of kinematic analysis is presented in this study to assess the reinforcement force of geosynthetics required under seismic loadings, particularly for steep slopes which are hardly able to maintain its stability. Note that curved sloping surfaces widely exist in natural slopes, but existing literatures were mainly focusing on a planar surface in theoretical derivation, due to complicated calculations. Moreover, the non-uniform soil properties cannot be accounted for in conventional upper bound analysis. Pseudo-dynamic approach is used to represent horizontal and vertical accelerations which vary with time and space. In an effort to resolve the above problems, the discretization technique is developed to generate a discretized failure mechanism, decomposing the whole failure block into various components. An elementary analysis permits calculations of rates of work done by external and internal forces. Finally, the upper bound solution of the required reinforcement force is formulated based on the work rate-based balance equation. A parametric study is carried out to give insights on the implication of influential factors on the performance of geosynthetic-reinforced steep slopes.

Keywords

earthquakes / pseudo-dynamic approach / discretization-based kinematic analysis / geosynthetics / steep slopes

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jian-feng Zhou, Chang-bing Qin, Qiu-jing Pan, Cheng-yang Wang. Kinematic analysis of geosynthetics-reinforced steep slopes with curved sloping surfaces and under earthquake regions. Journal of Central South University, 2019, 26(7): 1755-1768 DOI:10.1007/s11771-019-4131-6

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

ChenW FLimit analysis and soil plasticity [M], 1975, Amsterdam, Elsevier

[2]

XuJ S, YangX L. Seismic stability of 3D soil slope reinforced by geosynthetic with nonlinear failure criterion [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 118: 86-97

[3]

LiY X, YangX L. Soil-slope stability considering effect of soil-strength nonlinearity [J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2019, 19(3): 04018201

[4]

LiZ W, YangX L. Kinematical analysis of active earth pressure considering tension crack, pore-water pressure and soil nonlinearity [J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2019, 23156-62

[5]

ZhangJ H, WangW J, ZhangD B, ZhangB, MengF. Safe range of retaining pressure for three-dimensional face of pressurized tunnels based on limit analysis and reliability method [J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2018, 22(11): 4645-4656

[6]

ZhangD B, JiangY, YangX L. Estimation of 3D active earth pressure under nonlinear strength condition [J]. Geomechanics and Engineering, 2019, 17(6): 515-525

[7]

QinC B, ChianS C. New perspective on seismic slope stability analysis [J]. International Journal of Geomechnics, 2018, 18(7): 06018013

[8]

QinC B, ChianS C. Kinematic stability of a two-stage slope in layered soils [J]. International Journal of Geomechnics, 2017, 17906017006

[9]

ChenW F, LiuX LLimit analysis in soil mechanics [M], 1990, Amsterdam, Elsevier

[10]

MollonG, DiasD, SoubraA H. Rotational failure mechanisms for the face stability analysis of tunnels driven by a pressurized shield [J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2011, 35: 1363-1388

[11]

QIN C B, CHIAN S C, DU S Z. Revisiting seismic slope stability: intermediate or below-the-toe failure? [J]. Géotechnique, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.18.T.001.

[12]

QinC B, ChianS C. Kinematic analysis of seismic slope stability with a discretization technique and pseudo-dynamic approach: a new perspective [J]. Géotechnique, 2018, 68(6): 492-503

[13]

BashaB M, BabuG L S. Seismic reliability assessment of internal stability of reinforced soil walls using the pseudo-dynamic method [J]. Geosynthetics International, 2011, 8(5): 221-241

[14]

NimbalkarS S, ChoudhuryD, MandalJ N. Seismic stability of reinforced-soil wall by pseudo-dynamic method [J]. Geosynthetics International, 2006, 13(3): 111-119

[15]

ChoudhuryD, KatdareA. New approach to determine seismic passive resistance on retaining walls considering seismic waves [J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2013, 13(6): 852-860

[16]

NianT K, ChenG Q, LuanM T, YangQ, ZhengD F. Limit analysis of the stability of slopes reinforced with piles against landslide in nonhomogeneous and anisotropic soils [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2008, 451092-1103

[17]

QinC B, ChianS C, WangC Y. Kinematic analysis of pile behavior for improvement of slope stability in fractured and saturated Hoek-Brown rock masses [J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2017, 41: 803-827

[18]

LingH I, LeshchinskyD, PerryE B. Seismic design and performance of geosynthetic-reinforced soil structures [J]. Geotechnique, 1997, 47(5): 933-952

[19]

MichalowskiR L. Limit analysis in stability calculations of reinforced soil structures [J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 1998, 16: 311-331

[20]

MichalowskiR L. Soil reinforcement for seismic design of geotechnical structures [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 1998, 23: 1-17

[21]

AusilioE, ConteE, DenteG. Seismic stability analysis of reinforced slopes [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2000, 19: 159-172

[22]

EskandarinejadA, ShafieeA H. Pseudo-dynamic analysis of seismic stability of reinforced slopes considering non-associated flow rule [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2011, 18: 2091-2099

[23]

VahedifardF, ShahrokhabadiS, LeshchinskyD. Geosynthetic-reinforced soil structures with concave facing profile [J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2016, 44: 358-365

[24]

FerreiraF B, TopaG A, VieiraC S, LopesM L. Reliability analysis of geosynthetic-reinforced steep slopes [J]. Geosynthetics International, 2016, 23(4): 301-315

[25]

JavankhoshdelS, BathurstR J. Deterministic and probabilistic failure analysis of simple geosynthetic reinforced soil slopes [J]. Geosynthetics International, 2017, 24(1): 14-29

[26]

QIN C B, CHIAN S C. Pseudo-static/dynamic solutions of required reinforcement force for steep slopes using discretization-based kinematic analysis [J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.10.002.

[27]

QinC B, ChianS C. Seismic stability of geosynthetic-reinforced walls with variable excitation and soil properties: A discretization-based kinematic analysis [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2018, 102: 196-205

[28]

ShahgholiM, FakherA, JonesC J F P. Horizontal slice method of analysis [J]. Geotechnique, 2001, 51(10): 881-885

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

147

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/