Failure analysis study of railway draw-hook coupler

Abstract

Failure analysis of railway draw-hook coupler was carried out. The nondestructive testing method was undertaken on some failed couplers in service to designate critical areas of a coupler. Draw-Hook coupler is used to connect with the same hook coupler or automatic coupler. The influence of each connection types on the coupler strength in this study was discussed. A numerical stress analysis using FEM was performed, and many approaches including critical plane approach were carried out on fatigue life prediction of coupler under different conditions. The results of the proposed fatigue criterion and fatigue life predictions, as well as static numerical analysis, are validated with experimental results.

Keywords

draw-hook coupler / multi-axial fatigue / critical plane approach / life prediction / static fracture force

References

[1] GaoG J, ChenW, ZhangJ, DongH P, ZouX, LiJ, GuanW Y. Analysis of longitudinal forces of coupler devices in emergency braking process for heavy haul trains [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2017, 24(10): 2449-2457

[2] LiuP F, WangK Y. Dynamic performance of heavy-haul combined train applying emergency braking on straight line [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2017, 24(8): 1898-1908

[3] CernescuA, DumitruI, FaurN, BranzeiN, BogdanR. The analysis of a damaged component from the connection system of the wagons [J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2013, 29: 93-107

[4] MartinG C, HayW WMethod of analysis for determining the coupler forces and longitudinal motion of a long freight [D], 1967, Urbana, University of Illinois

[5] InfanteV, BrancoC M, BritoA S, MorgadoT L. A failure analysis study of cast steel railway couplings used for coal transportation [J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2003, 10: 475-489

[6] DaunysM, PutnaiteD. Determination of lifetime for railway carriage automatic coupler SA-3 [J]. Mechanika, 2005, 52: 5-9

[7] Mousavi Zadeh NoughabiS M, DehghaniK, PouranvariM. Failure analysis of automatic coupler SA-3 in railway carriages [J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2007, 14: 903-912

[8] ChunduruS P, KimM J, MirmanC. Failure analysis of railroad couplers of AAR type E [J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2011, 18: 374-385

[9] UIC Leaflet 520. Wagons, coaches and vans-Draw gear [S]. 2003.

[10] UIC Leaflet 825 O. Technical specification for the supply of draw hooks with nominal load equal to 250 kn, 600 kn or 1000 kn for tractive and trailing stock [S]. 1985.

[11] DasJ, SivakumarS M. An evaluation of multiaxial fatigue life assessment methods for engineering components [J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 1999, 76: 741-746

[12] LiuYStochastic modeling of multiaxial fatigue and fracture modeling [D], 2006, Nashville, Vanderbilt University

[13] KeB R, LinC L, LaiC W. Optimization of train-speed trajectory and control for mass rapid transit systems [J]. Control Engineering Practice, 2011, 19: 675-687

[14] ChouM, XiaX. Optimal cruise control of heavy-haul trains equipped with electronically controlled pneumatic brake systems [J]. Control Engineering Practice, 2007, 15(5): 511-519

[15] FatemiA, ShamsaeiN. Multiaxial fatigue: An overview and some approximation models for life estimation [J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2011, 33: 948-958

[16] ParkJ, NelsonD. Evaluation of an energy-based approach and a critical plane approach for predicting constant amplitude multiaxial fatigue life [J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2000, 22: 23-39

[17] InfanteV, DuarteP, BrancoC M. Fatigue analysis of railway coupling joint [J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2007, 14: 1175-1184