Improvement of alkaline electrochemical characteristics of bauxite residue amendment with organic acid and gypsum

Abstract

Neutralization of alkaline properties of bauxite residue (BR) by using organic acid and gypsum additions may effectively improve electrochemical properties and alleviate physicochemical barriers to ecological rehabilitation. Mineral acids, citric acid and hybrid acid–gypsum additions were compared for their potential to transform and improve zeta potential, isoelectric point (IEP), surface protonation and active alkaline —OH groups, which are critical factors for further improvement of physicochemical and biological properties later. Isoelectric points of untransformed bauxite residue and six transformed derivatives were determined by using electroacoustic methods. Electrochemical characteristics were significantly improved by the amendments used, resulting in reduced IEP and —OH groups and decreased surface protonation for transformed residues. XRD results revealed that the primary alkaline minerals of cancrinite, calcite and grossular were transformed by the treatments. The treatments of citric acid and gypsum promoted the dissolution of cancrinite. From the SEM examination, citric acid and gypsum treatments contributed to the reduction in IEP and redistribution of —OH groups on particle surfaces. The collective evidence suggested that citric acid and gypsum amendments may be used firstly to rapidly amend bauxite residues for alleviating the caustic conditions prior to the consideration of soil formation in bauxite residue.

Keywords

bauxite residue / alkalinity regulation / organic acid / gypsum / electrochemical characteristic / soil formation in bauxite residue

References

[1] KongX, LiM, XueS, HartleyW, ChenC, WuC, LiX, LiYi. Acid transformation of bauxite residue: Conversion of its alkaline characteristics [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2017

[2] LiY, JiangJ, XueS M G, KongX, LiX, LiM, LiChu. Effect of ammonium chloride on leaching behavior of alkaline anion and sodium ion in bauxite residue [J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2018, 28(10): 2125-2134

[3] LiX, YeY, XueS, JiangJ, WuC, KongX, HartleyW, LiYi. Leaching optimization and dissolution behavior of alkaline anions in bauxite residue [J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2018, 28(6): 1248-1255

[4] SmartD, CalleryS, CourtneyR. The potential for waste-derived materials to form soil covers for the restoration of mine tailings in Ireland [J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2016, 27(3): 542-549

[5] KongX, GuoY, XueS, HartleyW, WuC, YeY, ChengQing. Natural evolution of alkaline characteristics in bauxite residue [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 143: 224-230

[6] KongX, JiangX, XueS, HuangL, HartleyW, WuC, LiXiao. Migration and distribution of saline ions in bauxite residue during water leaching [J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2018, 28(3): 534-541

[7] XueS, YeY, ZhuF, WangQ, JiangJ, HartleyW. Changes in distribution and microstructure of bauxite residue aggregates following amendments addition [J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2019, 78: 276-286

[8] PontikesY. Bauxite residue valorization and best practices: Preface for the thematic section and some of the work to follow [J]. Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy, 2016, 2(4): 313-315

[9] XueS, KongX, ZhuF, HartleyW, LiX, LiYi. Proposal for management and alkalinity transformation of bauxite residue in China [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2016, 23(13): 12822-12834

[10] ZhuF, HouJ, XueS, WuC, WangQ, HartleyW. Vermicompost and gypsum amendments improve aggregate formation in bauxite residue [J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2017, 28: 2109-2120

[11] ZhuF, ChengQ, XueS, LiC, HartleyW, WuChuan, TianTao. Influence of natural regeneration on fractal features of residue microaggregates in bauxite residue disposal areas [J]. Land Degradation and Development, 2018, 29(1): 138-149

[12] KinnarinenT, HollidayL, HäkkinenA. Dissolution of sodium, aluminum and caustic compounds from bauxite residues [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2015, 79: 143-151

[13] ChvedovD, OstapS, LeT. Surface properties of red mud particles from potentiometric titration [J]. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2001, 182(1): 131-141

[14] SamalS, RayA K, BandopadhyayA. Characterization and microstructure observation of sintered red mud-fly ash mixtures at various elevated temperature [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 101: 368-376

[15] RenforthP, MayesW M, JarvisA P, BurkeI T, ManningD A C, GruizK. Contaminant mobility and carbon sequestration downstream of the Ajka (Hungary) red mud spill: The effects of gypsum dosing [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2012253259

[16] SantiniT C, KerrJ L, WarrenL A. Microbiallydriven strategies for bioremediation of bauxite residue [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2015, 293: 131-157

[17] CourtneyR, HarrisJ A, PawlettM. Microbial community composition in a rehabilitated bauxite residue disposal area: A case study for improving microbial community composition [J]. Restoration Ecology, 2014, 22(6): 798-805

[18] YeJ, CongX, ZhangP, HoffmannE, ZengG, LiuY, FangW, WuY, ZhangHai. Interaction between phosphate and acid-activated neutralized red mud during adsorption process [J]. Applied Surface Science, 2015, 356(8): 128-134

[19] LiangW, CouperthwaiteS J, KaurG, YanC, JohnstoneD W, MillarG J. Effect of strong acids on red mud structural and fluoride adsorption properties [J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2014, 423(3): 158-165

[20] CouperthwaiteS J, HanS, SantiniT, KaurG, JohnstoneD W, MillarG J, FrostR L. Bauxite residue neutralisation precipitate stability in acidic environments [J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2013, 10(6): 455-464

[21] XueS, WuY, LiY, KongX, ZhuF, HartleyW, LiX, YeYu. Industrial wastes applications for alkalinity regulation in bauxite residue: A comprehensive review [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2019, 26(2): 268-288

[22] DavisJ A, KentD B. Surface complexation modeling in aqueous geochemistry [J]. Reviews in Mineralogy, 1990, 23(1): 177-260

[23] FreireT S S, ClarkM W, ComarmondM J, PayneT E, Reichelt-BrushettA J, ThorogoodG J. Electroacoustic isoelectric point determinations of bauxite refinery residues: Different neutralization techniques and minor mineral effects [J]. Langmuir, 2012, 28(32): 11802-11811

[24] KosmulskiM. The pH dependent surface charging and points of zero charge. VI. Update [J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2014, 426(1): 209-212

[25] ClarkM W, HarrisonJ J, PayneT E. The pH-dependence and reversibility of uranium and thorium binding on a modified bauxite refinery residue using isotopic exchange techniques [J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2011, 356(2): 699-705

[26] WuF C, TsengR L, JuangR S. Initial behavior of intraparticle diffusion model used in the description of adsorption kinetics [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2009, 153(1): 1-8

[27] ZhuX, LiW, GuanXue. Kinetics of titanium leaching with citric acid in sulfuric acid from red mud [J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2015, 25(9): 3139-3145

[28] LiX, HuangX, QiT, ZhouQ, WangY, PengZ, LiuGui. Preliminary results on selective surface magnetization and separation of alumina-/silica-bearing minerals [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2015, 81: 135-141

[29] CourtneyR, HarringtonT, ByrneK A. Indicators of soil formation in restored bauxite residues [J]. Ecological Engineering, 2013, 58(13): 63-68