Rehabilitation of bauxite residue to support soil development and grassland establishment

Abstract

Rehabilitation (amendment and vegetation establishment) on bauxite residue is viewed as a promising strategy to stabilize the surface and initiate soil development. However, such approaches are inhibited by high pH, high exchangeable sodium (ESP) and poor nutrient status. Amendment with gypsum is effective in improving residue physical and chemical properties and promoting seed establishment and growth. Application of organics (e.g. compost) can address nutrient deficiencies but supplemental fertilizer additions may be required. A series of germination bioassays were performed on residue to determine candidate species and optimum rehabilitation application rates. Subsequent field trials assessed establishment of grassland species Holcus lanatus and Trifolium pratense as well as physical and chemical properties of amended residue. Follow up monitoring over five years assessed elemental content in grassland and species dynamics. With co-application of the amendments several grassland species can grow on the residue. Over time other plant species can invade the restored area and fast growing nutrient demanding grasses are replaced. Scrub species can establish within a 5 Yr period and there is evidence of nutrient cycling. High pH, sodicity and nutrient deficiencies are the major limiting factors to establishing grassland on residue. Following restoration several plant species can grow on amended residue.

Keywords

bauxite residue / substrate amendment / soil development / soil formation in bauxite residue / vegetation establishment

References

[1] XueS, WuY, LiY, KongX, ZhuF, WilliamH, LiX, YeYu. Industrial wastes applications for alkalinity regulation in bauxite residue: A comprehensive review [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2019, 26(2): 268-288

[2] XueS, LiM, JiangJ, MillarG J, LiC, KongXiang. Phosphogypsum stabilization of bauxite residue: Conversion of its alkaline characteristics [J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2019, 77: 1-10

[3] BurkeI T, MayesW M, PeacockC L, BrownA P, JarvisA P, GruizK. Speciation of arsenic, chromium, and vanadium in red mud samples from the Ajka spill site, Hungary [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46(6): 3085-3092

[4] KlauberC, GrafeM, PowerG. Bauxite residue issues: II. Options for residue utilization [J]. Hydrometallurgy, 2011, 108(12): 11-32

[5] Ujaczki, FeiglV, MolnarM, CusackP, CurtinT, CourtneyR, O'donoghueL, DavrisP, HugiC, EvangelouM W, BalomenosE. Reusing bauxite residues: Benefits beyond (critical raw) material recovery [J]. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 2018, 93(9): 2498-2510

[6] PowerG, GraefeM, KlauberC. Bauxite residue issues: I. Current management, disposal and storage practices [J]. Hydrometallurgy, 2011, 108(12): 33-45

[7] MayesW M, JarvisA P, BurkeI T, WaltonM, FeiglV, KleberczO, GruizK. Dispersal and attenuation of trace contaminants downstream of the Ajka bauxite residue (red mud) depository failure, Hungary [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45(12): 5147-5155

[8] RuytersS, MertensJ, VassilievaE, DehandschutterB, PoffijnA, SmoldersE. The red mud accident in Ajka (Hungary): Plant toxicity and trace metal bioavailability in red mud contaminated soil [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45(4): 1616-1622

[9] BurkeI T, MayesW M, PeacockC L, BrownA P, JarvisA P, GruizK. Speciation of arsenic, chromium, and vanadium in red mud samples from the Ajka spill site, Hungary [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46(6): 3085-3092

[10] OlszewskaJ P, MehargA A, HealkV, CareyM, GunnI D, SearleK R, WinfieldI J, SpearsB M. Assessing the legacy of red mud pollution in a shallow freshwater lake: Arsenic accumulation and speciation in macrophytes [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 50(17): 9044-9052

[11] ZhuF, LiaoJ, XueS, HartleyW, ZouQ, WuHao. Evaluation of aggregate microstructures following natural regeneration in bauxite residue as characterized by synchrotron-based X-ray micro-computed tomography [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 573: 155-163

[12] ZhuF, XueS, HartleyW, HuangL, WuC, LiXiao. Novel predictors of soil genesis following natural weathering processes of bauxite residues [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2016, 23: 2856-2863

[13] RenJ, ChenJ, HanL, WangM, YangB, DuP, LiFa. Spatial distribution of heavy metals, salinity and alkalinity in soils around bauxite residue disposal area [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 628: 1200-1208

[14] XueS, ZhuF, KongX, WuC, HuangL, HuangN, WilliamH. A review of the characterization and revegetation of bauxite residues (red mud) [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2016, 23: 1120-1132

[15] LiaoJ, JiangJ, XueS, ChengQ, WuH M R, HartleyW, HuangLong. A novel acid-producing fungus isolated from bauxite residue: the potential to reduce the alkalinity [J]. Geomicrobiology Journal, 2018, 35(10): 840-847

[16] CourtneyR, MullenG, HarringtonT. An evaluation of revegetation success on bauxite residue [J]. Restoration Ecology, 2009

[17] ChenC, PhillipsI R, WeiL, XuZhi. Behaviour and dynamics of di-ammonium phosphate in bauxite processing residue sand in Western Australia—II. Phosphorus fractions and availability [J]. Environmental Science & Pollution Research, 2010, 17: 1110-1118

[18] CourtneyR, HarringtonT. Growth and nutrition of holcus lanatus in bauxite residue amended with combinations of spent mushroom compost and gypsum [J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2012, 23(2): 144-149

[19] SantiniT C, KerrJ L, WarrenL A. Microbiallydriven strategies for bioremediation of bauxite residue [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2015, 293: 131-157

[20] ZhuF, ChengQ, XueS, LiC, HartleyW, WuC, TianTao. Influence of natural regeneration on fractal features of residue microaggregates in bauxite residue disposal areas [J]. Land Degradation and Development, 2018, 29: 138-149

[21] XueS, YeY, ZhuF, WangQ, JiangJ, HartleyW. Changes in distribution and microstructure of bauxite residue aggregates following amendments addition [J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2019, 78: 276-286

[22] CourtneyR, MullenG. Use of germination and seedling performance bioassays for assessing revegetation strategies on bauxite residue [J]. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 2009, 197: 15-22

[23] GrafeM, KlauberC. Bauxite residue issues: IV. Old obstacles and new pathways for in situ residue bioremediation [J]. Hydrometallurgy, 2011, 108(12): 46-59

[24] MeechamJ R, BellL C. Revegetation of alumina refinery wastes. 1. Properties and amelioration of the materials [J]. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 1977, 17: 679-688

[25] CourtneyR, HarringtonT. Assessment of plantavailable phosphorus in a fine textured sodic substrate [J]. Ecological Engineering, 2010, 36(4): 542-547

[26] ThiyagarajanC, PhillipsI R, DellB, BellR W. Micronutrient fractionation and plant availability in bauxite-processing residue sand [J]. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 2009, 47: 518-528

[27] CourtneyR, HarringtonT. Growth and nutrition of Holcus Lanatus in bauxite residue amended with combinations of spent mushroom compost and gypsum [J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2012, 23(2): 144-149

[28] ZhuF, HouJ, XueS, WuC, WangQ, HartleyW. Vermicompost and gypsum amendments improve aggregate formation in bauxite residue [J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2017, 28(7): 2109-2120

[29] FullerR D, NelsonE D P, RichardsonC J. Reclamation of red mud (bauxite residues) using alkaline-tolerant grasses with organic amendments [J]. Journal of Environmental Quality, 1982, 11: 533-539

[30] WongJ, HoG. Use of waste gypsum in the revegetation on red mud deposits: A greenhouse study [J]. Waste Management and Research, 1993, 11: 249-256

[31] CourtneyR G, JordanS N, HarringtonT. Physio-chemical changes in bauxite residue following application of spent mushroom compost and gypsum [J]. Land Degradation and Development, 2009

[32] CourtneyR, HarrisJ A, PawlettM. Microbial community composition in a rehabilitated bauxite residue disposal area: A case study for improving microbial community composition [J]. Restoration Ecology, 2014, 22(6): 798-805

[33] CourtneyR G, TimpsonJ P. Reclamation of fine fraction bauxite processing residue (red mud) amended with coarse fraction residue and gypsum [J]. Water Air and Soil Pollution, 2005

[34] EasthamJ, MoraldT, AylmoreP. Effective nutrient sources for plant growth on bauxite residue: II. Evaluating the response to inorganic fertilizers [J]. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 2006, 171: 315-331

[35] GoloranJ B, ChenC, PhillipsI R, XuZ C L M. Selecting a nitrogen availability index for understanding plant nutrient dynamics in rehabilitated bauxite-processing residue sand [J]. Ecological Engineering, 2013, 58: 228-237

[36] GoloranJ B, ChenC R, PhillipsI R, XuZ H, CondronL M. Plant phosphorus availability index in rehabilitated bauxite-processing residue sand [J]. Plant and Soil, 2014, 374(12): 565-578

[37] SumnerM E, NaiduRSodic Soils: Distribution, properties, management and environmental consequences [M], 1998, London, Oxford University Press

[38] BrayA W, StewartD I, CourtneyR, RoutS P, HumphreysP N, MayesW M, BurkeI T. Sustained bauxite residue rehabilitation with gypsum and organic matter 16 years after initial treatment [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2017, 52: 152-161