Numerical simulation of hydraulic fracture propagation in weakly consolidated sandstone reservoirs

Abstract

Frac-packing technology has been introduced to improve the development effect of weakly consolidated sandstone. It has double effects on increasing production and sand control. However, determining operation parameters of frac-packing is the key factor due to the particularity of weakly consolidated sandstone. In order to study the mechanisms of hydraulic fracture propagation and reveal the effect of fracturing parameters on fracture morphology in weakly consolidated sandstone, finite element numerical model of fluid-solid coupling is established to carry out numerical simulation to analyze influences of mechanical characteristics, formation permeability, fracturing fluid injection rate and viscosity on fracture propagation. The result shows that lower elastic modulus is favorable for inducing short and wide fractures and controls the fracture length while Poisson ratio has almost no effect. Large injection rate and high viscosity of fracturing fluid are advantageous to fracture initiation and propagation. Suitable fractures are produced when the injection rate is approximate to 3–4 m³/min and fluid viscosity is over 100 mPa·s. The leak-off of fracturing fluid to formation is rising with the increase of formation permeability, which is adverse to fracture propagation. The work provides theoretical reference to determine the construction parameters for the frac-packing design in weakly consolidated reservoirs.

Keywords

weakly-consolidated sandstone / frac-packing / hydraulic fracture / fracture propagation / numerical simulation

References

[1] FengS, ShiZ, WangYong. Application of high pressure pack sand control in Sebei gas field [J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2006, 13(3): 73-75

[2] QuZ, SuC, WenQing. Optimal design of parameters of sand control by frac-packing [J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2012, 19(6): 134-137

[3] GrubertD M. Evolution of a hybrid fracture/gravel-pack completion: Monopod platform, trading bay field, cook inlet, Alaska [J]. SPE Production Engineering, 1991, 6(4): 395-398

[4] RoodhartL P, FokkerP A, DaviesD R, ShlyapoberskyJ, WongG KFrac and pack stimulation: Application design and field experience from the gulf of Mexico to Borneo [C]//SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 1993507517

[5] ZhangW, YangZ, WeiYa. Advances in research of hydraulic fractures in unconsolidated sands [J]. Force and Application, 2014, 36(4): 396-402

[6] WangT T, JiangC W, GaoZ X, LiC X. Numerical simulation of sand load applied on high-speed train in sand environment [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2017, 24(2): 442-447

[7] KhodaverdianM, McelfreshPHydraulic fracturing stimulation in poorly consolidated sand: Mechanisms and consequences [C], 2000113

[8] ChangHHydraulic fracturing in particulate materials [D], 2004

[9] DongY, DeP C J. Observation and modeling of the hydraulic fracture tip in sand [C]//The 42nd US Rock Mechanics Symposium (USRMS). California: American Rock Mechanics Association, 200808377

[10] GermanovichL N, HurtR S, AyoubJ A. Experimental study of hydraulic fracturing in unconsolidated materials [J]. Tetrahedron Letters, 2012, 49(5): 888-892

[11] GolovinE, JasarevicH, ChudnovskyA, DudleyJ W, WongG KObservation and characterization of hydraulic fracture in cohesionless sand [C]//44th US Rock Mechanics Symposium and 5th USCanada Rock Mechanics Symposium, 2010, Utah, USA, American Rock Mechanics Association

[12] ZhouJ, DongY d P C J Z P L JExperimental study of the impact of shear dilation and fracture behavior during polymer injection for heavy oil recovery in unconsolidated reservoirs [C]//Canadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference, 2010, Alberta, Canada, Society of Petroleum Engineers

[13] ManchandaR, OlsonJ E, SharmaM MPermeability anisotropy and dilation due to shear failure in poorly consolidated sands [C], 2012

[14] HaimsonB, FairhurstC. Initiation and extension of hydraulic fractures in rocks [J]. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 1967, 7(3): 310-318

[15] JinY, ZhangX, ChenMian. Initiation pressure models for hydraulic fracturing of vertical wells in naturally fractured formation [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2005, 26(6): 113-114

[16] RenL, ZhaoJ, HuYong. Numerical calculation of rock breakdown pressure during hydraulic fracturing process [J]. Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2009, 28(s2): 3417-3422

[17] CarrierB, GranetS. Numerical modeling of hydraulic fracture problem in permeable medium using cohesive zone model [J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2012, 79: 312-328

[18] LaiX D, AnF C, WangY H, ZhuH Y, JinX C. Coupled flow, stress and damage modelling of interactions between hydraulic fractures and natural fractures in shale gas reservoirs [J]. International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Technology, 2016, 13(4): 359-390

[19] ZhangF, ZhuH, ZhouH, GuoJ, HuangB. Discreteelement-method/computational-fluid-dynamics coupling simulation of proppant embedment and fracture conductivity after hydraulic fracturing [J]. Spe Journal, 2017, 22(2): 632-644

[20] ZhangG M, LiuH, ZhangJ, WuHA, WangX X. Three-dimensional finite element simulation and parametric study for horizontal well hydraulic fracture [J]. Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering, 2010, 72(3): 310-317

[21] ChenZ, BungerA P, ZhangX. Cohesive zone finite element-based modeling of hydraulic fractures [J]. Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica, 2009, 22(5): 443-452

[22] DoB C, LiuW, YangQ D, SuX Y. Improved cohesive stress integration schemes for cohesive zone elements [J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2013, 107(7): 14-28

[23] ZhuH Y, ZhaoX, GuoJ C, JinX, AnF. Coupled flowstress-damage simulation of deviated-wellbore fracturing in hard-rock [J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2015, 26: 711-724

[24] GuoJ, ZhaoX, ZhuH, ZhangX, PanR. Numerical simulation of interaction of hydraulic fracture and natural fracture based on the cohesive zone finite element method [J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering, 2015, 25: 180-188