A new procedure for determining dry density of mixed soil containing oversize gravel

Hamed Farshbaf Aghajani , Masoud Ghodrati Yengejeh , Amirmohammad Karimzadeh , Hossein Soltani-Jigheh

Journal of Central South University ›› 2019, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (12) : 2841 -2856.

PDF
Journal of Central South University ›› 2019, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (12) : 2841 -2856. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-018-3957-7
Article

A new procedure for determining dry density of mixed soil containing oversize gravel

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

This paper presents a novel computational procedure for the maximum dry density of mixed soils containing oversize particles. At first, the large-scale compaction test data for mixed soils are analyzed by an artificial neural network to determine the main factors affecting the compaction. These factors are then imposed on a genetic programming method and a new mathematical equation emerges. The new equation has more conformity with the experimental data in comparison with the previous correction methods. Besides, the mixed soil dry density is associated with most base soil and oversize fraction specifications. With regard to the sensitivity analyses, if the mixed soil contains high percentages of oversize fraction, the mixed soil composition is governed by the specification of oversized grains, such as specific gravity and the maximum grain size and by increasing these factors, the mixed soil dry density is increased. In mixed soil with a low content of oversize, the base soil specification mainly controls the compaction behavior of mixed soil. Furthermore, if the base soil is inherently compacted with greater dry density, adding the oversize slightly improves the mixed soil dry density. In contrast, adding oversized grains to the base soil with a lower dry density produces a mixed soil with greater dry density. By increasing the maximum grain size difference between the oversize fraction and base soil, the dry density of mixed soil is enhanced.

Keywords

mixed soil / oversize / compaction / genetic programming / artificial neural network

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Hamed Farshbaf Aghajani, Masoud Ghodrati Yengejeh, Amirmohammad Karimzadeh, Hossein Soltani-Jigheh. A new procedure for determining dry density of mixed soil containing oversize gravel. Journal of Central South University, 2019, 25(12): 2841-2856 DOI:10.1007/s11771-018-3957-7

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

ASTM D1557-00 standard test method for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using modified effort [S]. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA: American Society for Testing and Materials.

[2]

ASTM D698-00 standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics on soil using standard effort [S]. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA: American Society for Testing and Materials.

[3]

ASTM D4253-02 standard test method for maximum index density and unit weight of soils using a vibratory table [S]. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA: American Society for Testing and Materials.

[4]

USCOLD.Construction testing of embankment materials containing large particles [R], 1988

[5]

HoustonS L, WalshK D. Comparison of rock correction methods for compaction of clayey soils [J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1993, 119(4): 763-778

[6]

WinterMThe effect of stone content on the determination of acceptability for earthworking [C], 1993

[7]

DonagheR, TownsendFScalping and replacement effects on the compaction characteristics of earth-rock mixtures [M], 1976

[8]

GargaV K, MadureiraC J. Compaction characteristics of river terrace gravel [J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1985, 111(8): 987-1007

[9]

NooranyI. Discussion of “relative compaction of fill having oversize particles” by Robert W. Day (October, 1989, Vol. 115, No. 10) [J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1991, 117(10): 1635-1637

[10]

WinterM, HólmgeirsdóttirT. The effect of large particles on acceptability determination for earthworks compaction [J]. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 1998, 31(3): 247-268

[11]

DonagheR, TownsendFCompaction characteristics of earth-rock mixtures report 1: Vicksburg silty clay and DeGray dam clayey sandy gravel [R], 1973

[12]

DonagheR T, TorreyI VStrength and deformation properties of earth-rock mixtures [R], 1985

[13]

TorreyI V H, DonagheR TCompaction characteristics of earth-rock mixtures [R], 1991

[14]

ZieglerE J. Effect of materials retained on the No. 4 sieve on the compaction test of soil [J]. Proceedings, Highway Research Board, 1948, 28: 409-414

[15]

GuerreroA M AEffects of the soil properties on the maximum dry density obtained from the standard proctor test [D], 2004, Florida, USA, University of Central Florida Orlando

[16]

ASTM D 4718–87 standard practice for correction of unit weight and water content for soils containing oversize particles [S]. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA: American Society for Testing and Materials.

[17]

NavfacMDesign manual—Soil foundations and earth structures [R], 1971

[18]

DayR W. Relative compaction of fill having oversize particles [J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1989, 115(10): 1487-1491

[19]

HsuT, SaxenaS K. A general formula for determining density of compacted soils with oversize particles [J]. Soils and Foundations, 1991, 31(3): 91-96

[20]

TorreyV H, DonagheR T. Compaction control of earth-rock mixtures: A new approach [J. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 1994, 17(3): 371-386

[21]

HoustonW, MerrimanJResearch on compaction control testing for gravelly soils [R], 1963, DTIC Document, Earth Research Program

[22]

ShelleyT L, DanielD E. Effect of gravel on hydraulic conductivity of compacted soil liners [J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1993, 119(1): 54-68

[23]

GordonB, HammondW, MillerREffect of rock content on compaction characteristics of clayey gravel [M], 1965

[24]

IndrawanI, RahardjoH, LeongE C. Effects of coarse-grained materials on properties of residual soil [J]. Engineering Geology, 2006, 82(3): 154-164

[25]

SimoniA, HoulsbyG T. The direct shear strength and dilatancy of sand–gravel mixtures [J]. Geotechnical & Geological Engineering, 2006, 24(3): 523-549

[26]

HamidiA, YazdanjouV, SalimiN. Shear strength characteristics of sand-gravel mixtures [J]. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2009, 3(1): 29-38

[27]

HamT G, NakataY, OrenseR P, HyodoM. Influence of gravel on the compression characteristics of decomposed granite soil [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2010, 136(11): 1574-1577

[28]

ChoobbastiA J, GhalandarzadehA, EsmaeiliM. Experimental study of the grading characteristic effect on the liquefaction resistance of various graded sands and gravelly sands [J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2014, 7(7): 2739-2748

[29]

ChenJ, LuoQ, JiangL, ZhangL, ZhaoM. An oversize correction method of dry density for non-cohesive soils filling the embankment of high-speed railway [J]. Science China: Technological Sciences, 2015, 58(2): 211-218

[30]

ShahinM A, MaierH R, JaksaM B. Data division for developing neural networks applied to geotechnical engineering [J]. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 2004, 18(2): 105-114

[31]

IkizlerS B, VekliM, DoganE, AytekinM, KocabasF. Prediction of swelling pressures of expansive soils using soft computing methods [J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2012, 24(2): 473-485

[32]

TsaiH C, TyanY Y, WuY W, LinY H. Determining ultimate bearing capacity of shallow foundations using a genetic programming system [J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2012, 23(78): 2073-2084

[33]

LiT, LiY, YangXiao. Rock burst pre diction based on genetic algorithms and extreme learning ma chine [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2017, 24(9): 2105-2113

[34]

SezerA. Simple models for the estimation of shearing resistance angle of uniform sands [J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2013, 22(1): 111-123

[35]

AghajaniH F, SalehzadehH, ShahnazariH. Application of artificial neural network for calculating anisotropic friction angle of sands and effect on slope stability [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2015, 22(5): 1878-1891

[36]

DemuthH, BealeM, WorksMMATLAB: Neural network toolbox: User’s guide [EB/OL], 1992

[37]

SmithM. Neural networks for statistical modeling [M]. Thomson learning. New York, 1993, Inc, USA: John Wiley Sons

[38]

GarsonG D. Interpreting neural-network connection weights [J]. AI^Expert, 1991, 6(4): 46-51

[39]

KozaJ RGenetic programming: on the programming of computers by means of natural selection [M], 1992

[40]

WagnerS, AffenzellerMHeuristiclab: A generic and extensible optimization environment [M], 2005538541

[41]

DrnevichV P, EvansA C, ProchaskaA BA study of effective soil compaction control of granular soils [R], 2007

[42]

BakerT H WTransportation, preparation, and storage of frozen soil samples for laboratory testing [M], 1976

[43]

BarnesGThe moisture condition value and compaction of stony clays [C]//Compaction Technology Conference, 1987, 1988, United Kingdom, London

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

131

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/