Identification and characteristics analysis of bottlenecks on urban expressways based on floating car data

Abstract

Identifying bottlenecks and analyzing their characteristics are important tasks to city traffic management authorities. Although the speed difference was proposed for the bottleneck identification in the existing research, the use of a secondary indicator has not been fully discussed. This paper strived to develop a method to identify the bottleneck on expressways by using the massive floating car data (FCD) in Beijing. First, the speed characteristics of bottlenecks on expressway were analyzed based on the speed contour map. The results indicated that there was a significant difference between speeds on the bottleneck and downstream links when a bottleneck was observed. The speed difference could indeed be used as the primary indicator to identify the bottleneck. However, it was also shown that a sufficiently large speed difference does not necessitate an activation of a bottleneck. The speed-at-capacity was then used as the secondary indicator to distinguish the real bottleneck from the non-bottleneck speed difference. Second, a practical method for identifying the bottleneck on expressways was developed based on the speed difference and the speed-at-capacity. Finally, the method was applied to identifying the bottlenecks of the 3rd Outer Ring Expressway in Beijing. The duration, affected distance, delay and cause were used to evaluate and analyze the bottlenecks.

Keywords

urban expressway / bottleneck identification / speed difference / speed-at-capacity

References

[1] DaganzoCFundamentals of transportation and traffic operations [M], 1997, Pergamon, Oxford

[2] CarvelJ, BalkeK, UllmanJ, FitzpatrickK, NowlinL, BrehmerCFreeway management handbook [R], 1997, Washington, DC, Federal Highway Administration

[3] MunozC, DaganzoC. The bottleneck mechanism of a freeway diverge [J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2002, 36(6): 483-505

[4] BanksJ. Two-capacity phenomenon at freeway bottlenecks: A basis for ramp metering [J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1991, 1320: 83-90

[5] CassidyM, WindoverJ. Methodology for assessing dynamics of freeway traffic flow [J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1995, 1484: 73-79

[6] CassidyM, BertiniR. Some Traffic features at freeway bottlenecks [J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 1999, 33(1): 25-42

[7] BertiniR, CassidyM. Some observed queue discharge features at a freeway bottleneck downstream of a merge [J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2002, 36(8): 683-697

[8] BertiniR, MytonA. Use of performance measurement system data to diagnose freeway bottleneck locations empirically in Orange County, California [J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2005, 1925: 48-57

[9] LawsonT, LovellD, DaganzoC. Using inputoutput diagram to determine spatial and temporal extents of a queue upstream of a bottleneck [J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1997, 1572: 140-147

[10] ChenC, SkabardonisA, VaraiyaP. Systematic identification of freeway bottlenecks [J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2004, 1867: 46-52

[11] WieczorekJ, Fernández-MoctezumaR, BertiniR. Techniques for validating an automatic bottleneck detection tool using archived freeway sensor data [J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2010, 2160: 87-95

[12] BanX-g, ChuL-y, BenouarH. Bottleneck identification and calibration for corridor management planning [J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2007, 1999: 40-53

[13] DemirolukS, TuydesH. A retrospective bottleneck analysis method to detect recurrent congestion in a traffic network using GPS technology [C]. The 90th Annual Meeting on Transportation Research Board, 2011

[14] JinJ, YuW-j, FangJ, RanBin. A robust bottleneck identification method using noisy and inconsistent fixed-point detector data [C]. The 89th Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board, 2010

[15] JinJ, FangJ, RanBin. Quantified evaluation on automatic freeway bottleneck identification methods considering data quality issues of loop detectors [C]. The 90th Annual Meeting on Transportation Research Board, 2011

[16] ZhangL, LevinsonD. Some properties of flows at freeway bottlenecks [J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2004, 1883: 122-131

[17] LongJ-c, GaoZ-y, RenH-l, LianA-ping. Urban traffic congestion propagation and bottleneck identification [J]. Science in China Series F: Information Sciences, 2008, 51(7): 948-964

[18] WangY, ShaoC-q, LiuYang. Traffic congestion identification method for urban expressway [J]. Journal of Transportation Information and Safety, 2014, 2: 23-27

[19] KernerB. Theory of breakdown phenomenon at highway bottlenecks [J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2000, 1710: 136-144

[20] KernerB, KlenovS. Probabilistic breakdown phenomenon at on-ramp bottlenecks in three-phase traffic theory [J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2006, 1965: 70-78

[21] ShaoC-q, ZhangZ-y, RongJian. Analysis of flow characteristics at freeway bottlenecks [J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2009, 35(3): 354-358

[22] ZhangJ-b, SongG-h, GongD-p, GaoY, YuL, GuoJ-fu. Analysis of rainfall effects on road travel speed in Beijing, China [J]. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 2018, 12(2): 93-102

[23] Van-AerdeM, RakhaH. Multivariate calibration of single regime speed-flow-density relationships [C]. Proceedings of the 6th 1995 Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference, 1995334341

[24] RakhaH, CrowtherB. Comparison of greenshields, pipes, and van Aerde car-following and traffic stream models [J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2002, 1802: 248-262

[25] ZhaoN-leTraffic flow characteristic parameter models of urban expressways based on physical properties [D], 2010, Beijing, School of Traffic and Transportation, Beijing Jiaotong University

[26] ZhuLinEvaluation and prediction models of macroscopic traffic conditions on urban expressway networks [D], 2012, Beijing, School of Traffic and Transportation, Beijing Jiaotong University

[27] FeiW-p, SongG-h, ZhangF, YuLei. Practical approach to determining traffic congestion propagation boundary due to traffic incidents [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2017, 24(2): 413-422

[28] ElefteriadouLAn introduction to traffic flow theory [M], 2014, New York, Springer