Effect of magnetite content on Bond work index and preconditioning: Case study on Chadormalu iron ore mine

Abstract

Grinding is one of the most costly operations in the mechanical breaking and mining. Determination of the breakage characteristics and preconditioning is important to increase the grinding efficiency. Investigations of the seismic, mechanical and breakage properties of iron oxides are very important parameters for investigating the rock fragmentation by blasting and comminution processes in iron ore mines. In this paper, at first, geomechanical and seismic properties of the oxide ores (magnetite and hematite) in the Chadormalu iron ore mine were studied. The results showed that the percentage of magnetite has a direct relationship with uniaxial compressive strength, tensile strength and P and S wave’s velocities and has an inverse relationship with Poisson ratio and porosity. Moreover, to study breakage and preconditioning characteristics in the iron ores, two samples with different magnetite percents were blasted by detonation cord. The results showed that with higher percentage of magnetite, the number of fractures induced by blasting increased. Bond work index and magnetite percent were investigated in the 430 blasts in the mine. This investigation not only confirmed the small scale blasting results, but also showed that increasing the magnetite percent up to 50% noticeably reduces Bond work index and energy consumption in the grinding process. Also, the relationship between muck pile fragmentation and magnetite percentage were studied for several blasts that had the same blast pattern parameters and similar geology conditions. These results also confirmed precedents conclusions regarding magnetite percent and preconditioning relationship.

Keywords

iron oxides / geomchanical parameter / preconditioning / magnetite percent / energy consumption

References

[1] MorganJ W, AndersE. chemical composition of earth, venus, and mercury [J]. National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1980, 77: 6973-6977

[2] ChicotD, MendozaJ, ZaouiA, LouisG, LepingleV, RoudetF, LesageJ. Mechanical properties of magnetite (Fe3O4), hematite (α-Fe2O3) and goethite (α-FeO·OH) by instrumented indentation and molecular dynamics analysis [J]. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 2011, 129: 862-870

[3] WaychunasG A. Crystal chemistry of oxides and oxyhydroxides [J]. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 1991, 25: 11-68

[4] OhmotoH. Nonredox transformations of magnetitehematite in hydrothermal systems [J]. Economic Geology, 2003, 98: 299-304

[5] CloutJ M F, ManuelJ R. Iron ore: Mineralogy, processing and environmental sustainability [M]. Elsevier Ltd, 2015

[6] MoralesL F G, LagoeiroL E, EndoI. First results on the LPO-derived seismic properties of iron ores from the Quadrilátero Ferrífero region, southeastern Brazil [J]. Tectonophysics, 2008, 460(1–4): 21-33

[7] KimKRock fracturing & mine to mill optimization [D], 2012, Arizona, University of Arizona

[8] ÅkessonU, HanssonJ, StighJ. Characterisation of microcracks in the Bohus granite, western Sweden, caused by uniaxial cyclic loading [J]. Engineering Geology, 2004, 72: 131-142

[9] TorabF MGeochemistry and metallogeny of magnetiteapatite deposits of the BAFQ mining district, central Iran [D], 2008, Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Clausthal University of Technology

[10] GoktanR MTheoretical and practical analysis of rock rippability [D], 1988, Istanbul, Istanbul Technical University

[11] TuğrulA, ZarifI. Correlation of mineralogical and textural characteristics with engineering properties of selected granitic rocks from Turkey [J]. Engineering Geology, 1999, 51: 303-317

[12] YasarE, ErdoganY. Correlating sound velocity with the density, compressive strength and Young’s modulus of carbonate rocks [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2004, 41: 871-875

[13] SharmaP K, SinghT N. A correlation between Schmidt hammer rebound numbers with impact strength index, slake durability index and P-wave velocity [J]. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 2011, 100: 189-195

[14] DiamantisK, GartzosE, MigirosG. Study on uniaxial compressive strength, point load strength index, dynamic and physical properties of serpentinites from Central Greece: Test results and empirical relations [J]. Engineering Geology, 2009, 108: 199-207

[15] KhandelwalM, SinghT N. Correlating static properties of coal measures rocks with P-wave velocity [J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2009, 79: 55-60

[16] ElorantaJThe efficiency of blasting verses crushing and grinding [C]//Proceeding of the 23th annual general conference on explosives and blasting technique, 1997157163

[17] MichauxS, DjordjevicN. Influence of explosive energy on the strength of the rock fragments and SAG mill throughput [J]. Mineral Engineering, 2005, 18: 439-448

[18] KernH, WenkH R. Preferred orientation in deformed metal and rocks [M]. Elsevier, 1985

[19] JernMMicro and macro crack growth as a result of blasting [C]//Proceeding of the 7th International Symposium on Rock Fragmentation by Blasting, 2002, Beijing, China, Metallurgical Industry Press: 155161

[20] TakemuraT, GolshaniA, OdaM, SuzukiK. Preferred orientations of open microcracks in granite and their relation with anisotropic elasticity [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2003, 40(4): 443-454

[21] LiuS, Faisal AnwarA H M, Cheol KimB, IchikawaY. Observation of microcracks in granite using a confocal laser scanning microscope [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2006, 43: 1293-1305

[22] OzkahramanH T. Breakage mechanisms and an encouraging correlation between the Bond parameters and the friability value [J]. The Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 2010, 110: 153-159