Degradation of joint surface morphology, shear behavior and closure characteristics during cyclic loading

Wen-chen Fan , Ping Cao , Long Long

Journal of Central South University ›› 2018, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (3) : 653 -661.

PDF
Journal of Central South University ›› 2018, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (3) : 653 -661. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-018-3768-x
Article

Degradation of joint surface morphology, shear behavior and closure characteristics during cyclic loading

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

In order to investigate the failure mechanism of rock joint, a series of laboratory tests including cyclic direct shear tests under constant normal load(CNL) conditions were conducted. Morphology parameters of the rock joint surface were precisely calculated by means of a three-dimensional laser scanning machine. All test results were analyzed to investigate the shear behavior and normal displacement behavior of rock joints under CNL conditions. Degradation of rock joint surface during cyclic shear tests was also analyzed. The comparison results of the height parameters and the hybrid parameters of the joint surface during cyclic tests show that the degradation of the surface mostly happens in the first shear and the constant normal loads imposed on the joints have significant promotion effects on the morphology degradation. During cyclic shear tests, joints surfaces evolve from rough state to smooth state but keep an overall undulation. Dilatancy of rock joints degrades with the degradation of joint surface and the increase of normal loads. The closure deformation of joint is larger than that of the intact rock, and the normal stiffness increases with the increase of shearing times.

Keywords

rock joint / constant normal load condition / surface morphology degradation / shear behavior / joint closure characteristic

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Wen-chen Fan, Ping Cao, Long Long. Degradation of joint surface morphology, shear behavior and closure characteristics during cyclic loading. Journal of Central South University, 2018, 25(3): 653-661 DOI:10.1007/s11771-018-3768-x

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

PattonFD. Multiple modes of shear failure in rock [C]. Proceedings of the 1st Congress of International Society of Rock Mechanics, 1966, Lisbon, ISRM: 509513

[2]

BartonN. Review of a new shear-strength criterion for rock joints [J]. Engineering Geology, 1973, 7: 287-332

[3]

BartonN, ChoubeyV. The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice [J]. Rock Mechanics, 1976, 10: 1-54

[4]

BananouriN, KanimiN S, BaghbananA, MohamadiH R. Over-consolidation effect on shear behavior of rock joints [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2011, 8: 83-91

[5]

ParkJ W, SongJ J. Numerical method for the determination of contact areas of a rock joint under normal and shear loads [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2013, 58: 8-22

[6]

KhabatA H, NimaB, SaeedK N. The influence of asperity deformability on the mechanical behavior of rock joints [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2014, 70: 154-161

[7]

LiK-H, CaoP, ZhangK, ZhongY-Fang. Macro and meso characteristics evolution on shear behavior of rock joints [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2015, 22: 3087-3096

[8]

GrasselliG, EggerP. Constitutive law for the shear strength of rock joints based on three-dimensional surface parameters [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2003, 40(1): 25-40

[9]

GrasselliG, WirthJ, EggerP. Quantitative three-dimensional description of a rough surface and parameter evolution with shearing [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2002, 39(6): 789-800

[10]

KulatilakePHSW, UmJ, PanG. Requirements for accurate quantification of self-affine roughness using the variogram method [J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1998, 35(3132): 41-67

[11]

HuangSL, OelfkeSM, SpeckR. Applicability of fractal characterization and modelling to rock joint profiles [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics, 1992, 29(2): 89-98

[12]

HomandF, BelemT, SouleyM. Friction and degradation of rock joint surfaces under shear loads [J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2001, 25(10): 973-999

[13]

LiY-r, HuangR-qiu. Relationship between joint roughness coefficient and fractal dimension of rock fracture surfaces [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2015, 75: 15-22

[14]

IndraratnaB, HaqueA, AzizN. Shear behavior of idealized infilled joints under constant normal stiffness [J]. Geotechnique, 1999, 49(3): 331-355

[15]

IndraratnaB, WelideniyaH S, BrownE T. A shear strength model for idealised infilled joints under constant normal stiffness (CNS) [J]. Geotechnique, 2005, 55(3): 215-226

[16]

IndraratnaB, JayanathanM, BrownE T. Shear strength model for over consolidated clay-infilled idealised rock joints [J]. Geotechnique, 2008, 58(1): 55-65

[17]

ZhuX-m, LiH-b, LiuB, ZouF, MoZ-z, YangF-w, HaoY-fei. Experimental study of shear strength of joints with first-order and second-order asperities [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 30(9): 1810-1818

[18]

HutsonR W, DowdingC H. Joint asperity degradation during cyclic shear [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics, 1990, 27(2): 109-119

[19]

BelemT, SouleyM, HomandF. Modeling surface roughness degradation of rock joint wall during monotonic and cyclic shearing [J]. Acta Geotech, 2007, 2(4): 227-248

[20]

BelemT, SouleyM, HomandF. Method for quantification of wear of sheared joint walls based on surface morphology [J]. Rock Mech Rock Eng, 2009, 42(6): 883-910

[21]

MohdM, MohdN, SongK I, KimD W, ChangI H. Evolution of joint roughness degradation from cyclic loading and its effect on the elastic wave velocity [J]. Rock Mechanics Rock Engineering, 2015

[22]

IndraratnaB, HaqueA. Experimental study of shear behavior of rock joints under constant normal stiffness conditions [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 1997, 34(34): 141-154

[23]

JiangY, XiaoJ, TanabashiY, MizokamiT. Development of an automated servo controlled direct shear apparatus applying a constant normal stiffness condition [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2004, 41: 275-286

[24]

BartonN R, BandisS. Effects of block size on the shear behavior of jointed rock [C]. Proceedings 23rd US Rock Mechanics Symposium, 1982739760

[25]

ChenY, CaoP, ChenR, YunTeng. Effect of water–rock interaction on the morphology of a rock surface [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2010, 47: 816-822

[26]

TseR, CrudenD M. Estimating joint roughness coefficients [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 1979, 16: 303-307

[27]

MaerzN H, FranklinJ A, BennettC P. Joint roughness measurement using shadow profilometry [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 1990, 27: 329-343

[28]

ReevesM J. Rock surface roughness and frictional strength [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 1985, 22: 429-442

[29]

BartonN, BandisS, BakhtarK. Strength deformation and conductivity coupling of rock joints [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 1985, 22: 121-140

[30]

HaqueA, RanjithP G. Laboratory and numerical modelling of shear behavior of natural rock joints under CNS [C]. Proceedings of 3rd Asian Rock Mechanics Symposium, 2004, Rotterdam, Mill press: 10171020

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

112

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/