A comparative crashworthiness analysis of multi-cell polygonal tubes under axial and oblique loads

Abstract

In order to investigate the energy absorption characteristics of multi-cell polygonal tubes with different cross-sectional configurations, firstly, the theoretical formulae of the mean crushing force under axial load for four multi-cell polygonal tubes were derived by combining the Super Folding Element theory with Zhang’s research results. These formulae can be used to validate the numerical model and quickly evaluate the energy absorption ability of multi-cell polygonal tubes. Furthermore, a comparative study on the energy absorption performance of eight multi-cell polygonal tubes under axial and oblique loads was conducted. The results show that all tubes have a stable mixed deformation mode under axial load. The multi-cell decagon tube has better energy-absorption ability compared with other tubes. When θ is less than 10°, all the tubes maintain a stable deformation mode, and the multi-cell decagon tube also has the biggest crushing force efficiency and specific energy absorption among these eight tubes; meanwhile compared with the results at θ=0°, the specific energy absorption of all tubes decreases by about 8%–21%, while the crushing force efficiency increases by 20%–56%. However, at large angles 20° and 30°, all of the tubes collapse in bending modes and lose their effectiveness at energy absorption.

Keywords

multi-cell polygonal tubes / thin-walled structure / axial load / oblique load / energy absorption / mean crushing force

References

[1] AlexanderJ M. An approximate analysis of the collapse of thin cylindrical shells under axial loading [J]. Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics, 1960, 13(1): 10-15

[2] AbramowiczW, JonesN. Dynamic axial crushing of circular tubes [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1984, 2(3): 263-281

[3] WierzbickiT, AbramowiczW. On the crushing mechanics of thin-walled structures [J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1983, 50: 727-739

[4] ChenW-g, WierzbickiT. Relative merits of single-cell, multi-cell and foam-filled thin-walled structures in energy absorption [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2001, 39(4): 287-306

[5] ZhangX, ChengG-d, ZhangHui. Theoretical prediction and numerical simulation of multi-cell square thin-walled structures [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2006, 44(11): 1185-1191

[6] QiC, YangS, DongF-liang. Crushing analysis and multiobjective crashworthiness optimization of tapered square tubes under oblique impact loading [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2012, 59(4): 103-119

[7] HongW, FanH-l, XiaZ-c, JinF-n, ZhouQing. Axial crushing behaviors of multi-cell tubes with triangular lattices [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2014, 63(1): 106-117

[8] KashaniM H, AlavijehH S, AkbarshahiH, ShakeriM. Bitubular square tubes with different arrangements under quasi-static axial compression loading [J]. Materials and Design, 2013, 51: 1095-1103

[9] GaoG-j, DongH-p, TianH-qi. Collision performance of square tubes with diaphragms [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2014, 80(1): 167-177

[10] DongH-p, GaoG-j, XieS-c, LiJian. Collision performance of bitubular tubes with diaphragms [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2015, 22(9): 3657-3665

[11] NiaA A, ParsapourM. An investigation on the energy absorption characteristics of multi-cell square tubes [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2013, 68(10): 26-34

[12] ZhangX, ChengG-dong. A comparative study of energy absorption characteristics of foam-filled and multi-cell square tubes [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2007, 34(11): 1739-1752

[13] NajafiA, Rais-RohaniM. Mechanics of axial plastic collapse in multi-cell, multi-corner crush tubes [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2011, 49(1): 1-12

[14] JusufA, DirgantaraT, GunawanL, PutraI S. Crashworthiness analysis of multi-cell prismatic structures [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2015, 78: 34-50

[15] QiuN, GaoY-k, FangJ-g, FengZ-x, SunG-y, LiQing. Crashworthiness analysis and design of multi-cell hexagonal columns under multiple loading cases [J]. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 2015, 104: 89-101

[16] HanD C, ParkS H. Collapse behavior of square thin-walled columns subjected to oblique loads [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 1999, 35(3): 167-184

[17] SongJ, GuoF-lin. A comparative study on the windowed and multi-cell square tubes under axial and oblique loading [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2013, 66(3): 9-14

[18] FangJ-g, GaoY-k, SunG-y, QiuN, LiQing. On design of multi-cell tubes under axial and oblique impact loads [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2015, 95: 115-126

[19] GoelM D. Deformation, energy absorption and crushing behavior of single-, double- and multi-wall foam filled square and circular tubes [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2015, 90: 1-11

[20] ZhangZ-h, LiuS-tian. Crashworthiness of dynamical axial crushing of polygonal thin-walled tubes [C]// SAE-C2007. Tianjin, China, 2007437443

[21] ZhangX, ZhangHui. Energy absorption of multi-cell stub columns under axial compression [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2013, 68: 156-163